Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
As an 'early Intel Macs' newbie (full dislcosure, a complete Mac newbie!), and from what I've understood, you do qualify, just, or maybe even easily. The original definition post has been expanded, as I understand it, to include up to Sandy Bridge Macs and maybe Ivy Bridge Macs, so in all honesty, you're in the club as like as not.
 
Not to restart the debate on classifying Intels (but basically doing so), is my 2012 iMac considered early Intel in any remote way? I'd wager not, but I do run Mavericks and mostly 32-bit software on it, so it feels like it to me. Even have the OS skinned to resemble Snow Leopard.

Otherwise, if it is not, I am no longer in the early Intel camp. I haven't been using any of them other than an occasional boot of my 2007 Mac mini. I need to pull out my White iMacs for a spin again, but it's more of a novelty than anything at this point. I am concretely in the Mojave and before OS camp still, I have simply no use case for modern macOS other than developing apps, 95% of my apps don't work anymore.

In my book, the 2012 iMac is early Intel, so yes, you’re still in the camp. :)
 
On my iMac 10,1 running high sierra, I found an app 'iMazing' to use instead of iTunes to transfer apps from an obsolete pad mini to an ipad 2. It seemed impossible to do in iTunes, mainly due it not appearing as an option. One of the options in the rather busy iMazing menu is 'transfer to another device'. The ipad app was an early free version of 'Inkpad' when it was still open source.. a rather slick vector graphics program.
 
  • Like
Reactions: eyoungren
Good! So that means my 2012 MacBook Pro is classified as early Intel by proxy, no?

Have a look at that link I provided and run through the seven-point criteria list I described within. :)

By my accounting of the late 2012 retina MacBook Pros, they score a 5 out of 7 for qualifying as Early Intel Macs. (To qualify, a model would need a 4 out of 7 at minimum.) Mid-2012 non-retina unibody MacBook Pros even score higher at a 7 out of 7.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MacFoxG4
I received an essentially brand-new-in-box Magic Trackpad (first gen) from eBay for my 5,1...
Two observations about this:
1) In Snow Leopard, it has the old scrolling behaviour compared to High Sierra and modern Macs that have the opposite behaviour. Somewhat annoying to go back and forth between the two. Now that I've typed this... I am suddenly wondering whether that wouldn't also be the case with my mouse. Hmmm.
2) I am astounded that the batteries in it (which have a 2016 date on them in relatively big text, so I assume that's their 'best before' date) still seemed good.

Is there a way to figure out the manufacture date of this thing? I should note, too, that the packaging makes reference to 10.6.4 + "Apple Magic Trackpad Software Update" being required, which again suggests an early production model...
 
  • Like
Reactions: retta283
On my iMac 10,1 running high sierra, I found an app 'iMazing' to use instead of iTunes to transfer apps from an obsolete pad mini to an ipad 2. It seemed impossible to do in iTunes, mainly due it not appearing as an option. One of the options in the rather busy iMazing menu is 'transfer to another device'. The ipad app was an early free version of 'Inkpad' when it was still open source.. a rather slick vector graphics program.
iMazing has been around for quite some time. It provides third party options that iTunes should be able to do, but Apple won't allow. I've never used it myself, but it's constantly mentioned in the iPhone subforum here.
 
Yes. To within the week it was made, whatever it (the Apple hardware) was.

What is the serial number?
That is an excellent question - I actually couldn't find a serial number on either the Magic Trackpad or the packaging before I made that post. Let me look again... or maybe I should be looking in software.

Edit: Aha. Found an engraved serial number on the cylindrical battery holding part. I guess this is just a traditional Apple serial number that can be decoded like any other?

Edit: I think the serial number is 8B0310R01BRDA. Most serial decoder web sites I've tried don't recognize it.
 
That is an excellent question - I actually couldn't find a serial number on either the Magic Trackpad or the packaging before I made that post. Let me look again... or maybe I should be looking in software.

Edit: Aha. Found an engraved serial number on the cylindrical battery holding part. I guess this is just a traditional Apple serial number that can be decoded like any other?

Edit: I think the serial number is 8B0310R01BRDA. Most serial decoder web sites I've tried don't recognize it.

The serial is a bit longer than I would expect, but I think that latter portion might have something extra.

The factory is in the PRC (not sure where specifically) and is known for manufacturing peripherals like human interface devices (keyboard, mice, etc.). This checks out here. That’s the 8B part.

Next is the digit 0, which denotes 2010. This also happens to be the year Apple moved from an 11-digit to a 12-digit alphanumeric serial syntax (yours shows 13). The digits following the 0 is 31, which would be the 31st week of the year, or ~30 July to ~6 August.

This reference is how you can decode most Apple serials before 2021.
 
The serial is a bit longer than I would expect, but I think that latter portion might have something extra.

The factory is in the PRC (not sure where specifically) and is known for manufacturing peripherals like human interface devices (keyboard, mice, etc.). This checks out here. That’s the 8B part.

Next is the digit 0, which denotes 2010. This also happens to be the year Apple moved from an 11-digit to a 12-digit alphanumeric serial syntax (yours shows 13). The digits following the 0 is 31, which would be the 31st week of the year, or ~30 July to ~6 August.

This reference is how you can decode most Apple serials before 2021.
Okay, that's nuts - the Magic Trackpad was announced July 27, 2010. Shipping immediately. So this particular one was built... the week after the launch, someone bought it, maybe opened the exterior box, never unpacked it, and now, 13 years later, it's landed here.
 
Okay, that's nuts - the Magic Trackpad was announced July 27, 2010. Shipping immediately. So this particular one was built... the week after the launch, someone bought it, maybe opened the exterior box, never unpacked it, and now, 13 years later, it's landed here.

Not terribly nuts, in the big perspective: for any novel product, many copies will be manufactured both in advance of and early in its product cycle, if initial sales are shown to be brisk. This would be an option exercised should the demand be high, built into the arrangement between customer (i.e., Apple) and vendor (i.e., whichever supplier was producing the trackpads). Whilst many more were made after the beginning, they probably were not made all at once, but on-demand, as needed.

A similar idea can sometimes be found with other manufactured items — including, of all things, coinage. When the two-dollar coin, the “toonie”, was introduced in Canada (to replace the two-dollar banknote) in 1996, a much greater number of those than any subsequent year was minted to accommodate this transition and demand. Even to this day some 27 years later, the chances of finding a 1996 toonie over subsequent years remain among some of the highest.

Likewise, back with Apple stuff, it’s not uncommon to find manufacture dates of any particular Mac tending to be more likely toward the beginning of the product cycle (or just before, to get enough examples in stock for release day). The times I’ve personally run into late-in-cycle Mac products tended to be for things which were BTO/CTO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheShortTimer
Not terribly nuts, in the big perspective: for any novel product, many copies will be manufactured both in advance of and early in its product cycle, if initial sales are shown to be brisk. This would be an option exercised should the demand be high, built into the arrangement between customer (i.e., Apple) and vendor (i.e., whichever supplier was producing the trackpads). Whilst many more were made after the beginning, they probably were not made all at once, but on-demand, as needed.

A similar idea can sometimes be found with other manufactured items — including, of all things, coinage. When the two-dollar coin, the “toonie”, was introduced in Canada (to replace the two-dollar banknote) in 1996, a much greater number of those than any subsequent year was minted to accommodate this transition and demand. Even to this day some 27 years later, the chances of finding a 1996 toonie over subsequent years remain among some of the highest.

Likewise, back with Apple stuff, it’s not uncommon to find manufacture dates of any particular Mac tending to be more likely toward the beginning of the product cycle (or just before, to get enough examples in stock for release day). The times I’ve personally run into late-in-cycle Mac products tended to be for things which were BTO/CTO.
Oh, I don't disagree with that - what seemed odd is that an early production example would have sat unused for 13 years. Obviously, inventory management is what it is and some retailers turn over inventory more quickly than others, but I guess I would have thought it would be more likely that a late-production example wouldn't get unpacked and used. Just seems odd for someone in, say, August or September 2010 to go down to their Apple reseller, buy a shiny new Magic Trackpad, take it home, and not even try it out once... and yet presumably not return it, just leave it sitting around for their kid to sell 13 years later. (The eBay listing said their dad "liked to buy things and then put them on the shelf."... and I suppose the serial number data backs up that story, as strange as it seems)
 
Oh, I don't disagree with that - what seemed odd is that an early production example would have sat unused for 13 years.

Again, this isn’t odd.

Some (probably more than some) people buy… stuff because they can, then don’t use the stuff they buy. They put it into a closet or into storage for years until they get sell it, get rid of it, or give it away.

I bought a late 2011 MBP early this spring for, like, less then a tenth of what it sold for new. Since getting it, I have put a full 25 per cent of all the charge cycles onto its original battery, which was made at the same time the computer was (or, to be precise, the week before the laptop was assembled). The laptop was unusually clean inside before I added new thermal paste and cleaned the not-very-dusty fan. IT was, by most intents, nearly new.

In 2019, I picked up an 11-year-old 17-inch MBP which needed only a new logic board (because of the bad Nvidia GPU revision) and battery. The cosmetics of the entire system and interior were virtually pristine. It probably got use until the 602 revision of the GPU failed within two years, then shoved away into a closet with a 2008 white MacBook which had a pinched backlight wire (and also not heavily used). Total cost for acquiring both was a bag of locally roasted coffee.

It amazes me frequently how often people buy stuff then either barely use said stuff or altogether buy stuff and then stick said stuff somewhere it never gets used. It’s a privilege many do not have, but it’s stunning how often that privilege still exists in a world of haves and have-nots.


Obviously, inventory management is what it is and some retailers turn over inventory more quickly than others, but I guess I would have thought it would be more likely that a late-production example wouldn't get unpacked and used. Just seems odd for someone in, say, August or September 2010 to go down to their Apple reseller, buy a shiny new Magic Trackpad, take it home, and not even try it out once... and yet presumably not return it, just leave it sitting around for their kid to sell 13 years later.

In my experience (including years of working in different aspects of retailing), the earliest buys of a mass-selling item frequently get bought out of an optimism or a belief that someone in their lives will want it, rather than any kind of immediate pragmatism — especially when there’s a belief by the buyer that the item being bought and left packaged might one day be some kind of collector’s item they’ll get big money for flipping after a few years of holding onto it. What most don’t realize is “a few years” tends to be longer than most of their lives — a generation or two.

Other folks, meanwhile, who come in to buy something, exactly when they need it, even when the thing they need is near the end of its selling cycle, are going to buy and use it because they need it to complete a certain set of tasks before them at that time. Sometimes they buy remaining or clearance stock, but other times, such as in products which allow buyer customizing (like a computer or a car), they will customize the order to better fit their needs and, generally, will be the likeliest to use those items as intended.


(The eBay listing said their dad "liked to buy things and then put them on the shelf."... and I suppose the serial number data backs up that story, as strange as it seems)

They would be one of those, well, hoarding optimists who bought multiple units at the time. Given their commonality, I hope you didn’t pay near or more than the original retail price for it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheShortTimer
They would be one of those, well, hoarding optimists who bought multiple units at the time. Given their commonality, I hope you didn’t pay near or more than the original retail price for it.
No, I actually paid less, I think, though international shipping didn't help. But this trackpad was much cheaper than most others because it was listed as 'open box' rather than 'new' and it's only when you read the description that you realized that it had never been unpacked and the only 'open' part of the box was the outside box.

Now, if only I could get a brand new never-used M7803 keyboard that way... but there's one fellow on eBay who seems to sell those for insane prices and he buys up all the other ones that might have sold for less than his.
 
A relatively minor set of early Intel tweakings. Prepare the cheesegrater for sale. Try and sort out what peripherals to use with what OS on the iMac 10,1. Put it back to High Sierra. Plugged in an A1048 keyboard. Plugged the Logitech mouse dongle into the keyboard. That keeps things as vlean as possible. Also gound and installed the appropriate Garageband version, will begin to play with that.
 
Due to convenience issues, I tried OCLP to Monterey on the iMac 10,1. It worked, eventually, but boy, did it take a long time...And as exepected, was then unusable due to graphics issues. Would certainly be just as bad on the cMP 3,1, despite the masssively bigger CPU horsepower. So will leave both on High Sierra for now.
 
Leveraged the Windows capabilities of my 2012 MBP again. This time I played Train Sim Classic. I had heard mixed things about how well it would run. The game originally came out in 2009, but someone in 2021 on YouTube claimed their high end PC had trouble running it. Steam had their Summer sale on at the time, so I decided to give TSC a whirl on my MBP. The game starts up fine and the Hudson line route plays great even at high settings. The LIRR route, however, plays like molasses in January even on the lowest settings. I'm guessing this is due to the routes coming to the game roughly 10 years apart, with LIRR being the newer one. Definitely weary of buying DLC for this game now.

I also played around with my 2006 MBP again. The noise of my room fan drowns out the MBP's fan, but I got curious to see how fast the fans were running and what the temperature was for the CPU. I tried iStat Menus 2.0 first, and while it did install and run, it said it needed an Intel temperature sensor add-on which I was not able to find. I ended up uninstalling iStat Menus and installed an older version of smcfancontrol. That worked and I discovered that after having been running for an hour with a couple Finder windows open, MS Word, and one tab open in InterWeb, the CPU temp was 145 degrees Fahrenheit and the fans were running around 5900-6000 RPM (which seems to be the max according to the fan speed sliders in smcfancontrol. So I guess I now know why the fans are so loud on this mac.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheShortTimer
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.