I sometimes find these types of debates strange, for some reason people seem to take the stance of LCD=Apple and AMOLED=Samsung, when they're both display technologies manufactured by different manufacturers and both can use the different tech. It would be like if back in the year 2000 people arguing about how much better CRT is than LCD and that Apple would never switch to LCD on their iMac line. As AMOLED keeps developing, of course one day Apple will switch to that, as that is the future of display tech and has been in development for several years now, and is currently passing LCD in display quality. I think all is needed is for the price to come down and for it to be viable on the scale Apple needs it.
I think the watch is a trial run for them. If it works out well, they may bump up to the phone before tackling the tablet.
It also gives them a way to save face when they do go OLED on their phones/tablets/computers. People will say "but you said you didn't like OLED" and they can answer "but we've been using OLED already, in the Apple Watch!" like a get out of jail free card.
It also gives them a way to save face when they do go OLED on their phones/tablets/computers. People will say "but you said you didn't like OLED" and they can answer "but we've been using OLED already, in the Apple Watch!" like a get out of jail free card.
You're overt thinking it. I don't think you'll find anyone asking who gets the credit for gorilla glass. Credit goes to Corning. End of story. I wouldn't say, the glass on top of the display of my note 4 has amazing scratch resistance. Way to go Samsung! We all know it's all Corning. But using the same mentality of the poster I was exchanging with, it's what he/she would say.
I think when the case is made financially, technologically and logistically Apple will consider a change.
AMOLED is the only logical display tech for a smartwatch so Apple going that route is not surprising.
I think all is needed is for the price to come down and for it to be viable on the scale Apple needs it.
Bleh, that would really suck. I'd throw mine out the window immediately.
Sorry folks, this sounds like the new 3.5 inches is the perfect screen size BS from devoted Apple users. We know how that ended up. I agree with most, Apple won't sacrifice profit margin to start using the more expensive oled screens. After much of my research before buying my all conquering Note 4, I came close to getting an iPhone. But you quickly realize Apple is about profit margins, and about giving you what they determine as the best user experience, not the best hardware. And as a person that pays for my phones outright, I just couldn't buy into that BS. Why can I buy a device with an incredible higher res and bigger Amoled display with a wacom digitizer for cheaper than your smaller old tech, lower res lcd display? And when you throw in the fact the Note 4 comes with more memory and storage (expandable storage as well), there is simple just no excuse. And this is coming from a previous Samsung basher. One look at my posting history at windows phone central, and you'll see what blind following of a brand looks like. But no more blind following for this guy. I just want my $$$ worth.
And Samsung isn't about profit margins with those phony leather backs and fake metal bezels? It's called business. Companies make products to make money, simple as that.
Which one do you stare at most often the back, side or screen? All others are secondary as long as the screen is top notch.
Not my point at all but you are holding the back and sides of the phone more often that you're looking at the screen.
More likely you're holding a plastic case that covers the back and sides so your piint is still irrelevant.
No.. I haven't used a case on my phone in a long time. The raw metal and sharp bezels feel awesome in the hand. Let's not assume things.
Have any of you seen the gorgeous OLED phones, TVs and now tablets? Like the Samsung Galaxy Tab S 8.4" and 10.5" ones? The screens are literally night and day superior to the LCD displays in iPads. I almost pulled the trigger on the 10.5 when I saw it but I'm holding out for a larger form factor (12" or larger).
AMOLED still burns in, not all panels have the issue but there are a lot that have the issue. Pretty much the same situation as with IPS LCD panels, some have image retention and some don't.What burn in ? I have owned a Samsung Galaxy S2, s3, s4 , note 3 and note 4 and none have burn in .... Seriously if you have never used one no valid experience using it
Never. LCD is superior to OLED anyway
AMOLED still burns in, not all panels have the issue but there are a lot that have the issue. Pretty much the same situation as with IPS LCD panels, some have image retention and some don't.
Just flat out saying AMOLED doesn't burn in is a lie.
AMOLED still burns in, not all panels have the issue but there are a lot that have the issue. Pretty much the same situation as with IPS LCD panels, some have image retention and some don't.
Just flat out saying AMOLED doesn't burn in is a lie.
Motorola:Still waiting for those examples. Even if they do it's obviously not the problem you make it out to be, or it would be ways for you to find examples.