Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

G4er?

macrumors 6502a
Jan 6, 2009
639
30
Temple, TX
This. The Mini languished for years, the Mac Pro gets very few refreshes and has video cards generations behind the PC, there is no mid-tower Mac, many products still use C2D, XServe got canned. Final Cut is on the verge of collapse. Apple hasn't even adopted recent technology like Blu-Ray, USB3, HDMI, and eSata; remember the days when Apple pioneered new technology?QUOTE]

Used to be we waited anxiously to see what new thing Apple added to its computers. Now we wait anxiously in fear of what feature Apple is going to drop next.
 

janstett

macrumors 65816
Jan 13, 2006
1,235
0
Chester, NJ
From your last post i think i feel the same as you and working in a similar industry the way things are does worry me a little....

I quoted the above passage because it made me think... Google's Chrome OS... lets wait and see!!

Interesting, but Chrome is all about turning Linux into a browser-centric fast booting animal, and IMO it's being threatened from the bottom by Android and iOS. I think Chrome's going to go extinct rather quickly. And even if it didn't, it's all about being lightweight and web centric.
 

orfeas0

macrumors 6502a
Aug 21, 2010
971
1
Athens, Greece
Interesting, but Chrome is all about turning Linux into a browser-centric fast booting animal, and IMO it's being threatened from the bottom by Android and iOS. I think Chrome's going to go extinct rather quickly. And even if it didn't, it's all about being lightweight and web centric.

i agree chrome OS is going to exticnt (hell, its already forgotten and its not even out yet), but iOS is extremely different than chrome.
i mean chrome is running on linux, which is an open OS that you can change it the way you want it (i hope they dont remove that part). iOS is extremely locked.
btw have you guys seen jolibook/jolicloud? seems like a premature chrome OS, or maybe even better if it had a little support behind it...
 

*LTD*

macrumors G4
Feb 5, 2009
10,703
1
Canada
This. The Mini languished for years, the Mac Pro gets very few refreshes and has video cards generations behind the PC, there is no mid-tower Mac, many products still use C2D, XServe got canned. Final Cut is on the verge of collapse. Apple hasn't even adopted recent technology like Blu-Ray, USB3, HDMI, and eSata; remember the days when Apple pioneered new technology?QUOTE]

Used to be we waited anxiously to see what new thing Apple added to its computers. Now we wait anxiously in fear of what feature Apple is going to drop next.

Meanwhile back on Planet Earth, Apple is enjoying record Mac sales quarter-for-quarter in a market dominated by cheaper alternatives in a depressed economy. And this is a closed, controlled software/hardware ecosystem that happens to set the bar (every year) for the entire industry.

Apple has proven that Perfection is not when there is nothing more to add; but when there is northing more to take away.

No one cares about a mid-tower Mac. Nothing has indicated Apple should make one. Retailers can barely unload desktops as it is. There will be no mid-tower mac. Certainly not in a market where we're moving to mobile-everything at breakneck speed and re-tooling everything to run on mobile devices.

Gamers (and "Pros" - or people who "think" they are) who like to fsck around inside computer cases can go buy a Mac Pro or a Dell.
 
Last edited:

MacAttack89

macrumors member
Oct 1, 2010
49
0
Im a script supervisor out in Hollywood for the movies. I use mac for pre production, filming, then post! All the films I've worked on have been edited on Mac Pros. Apple knows there being used everywhere in the movie industry. Every once in a while you'll find a linux program (mostly at Pixar) but mostly Apple! I think Apple knows there depended on for movies. I don't think theyll mess with OSX too much knowing this. But i'm probably wrong!
 

*LTD*

macrumors G4
Feb 5, 2009
10,703
1
Canada
Im a script supervisor out in Hollywood for the movies. I use mac for pre production, filming, then post! All the films I've worked on have been edited on Mac Pros. Apple knows there being used everywhere in the movie industry. Every once in a while you'll find a linux program (mostly at Pixar) but mostly Apple! I think Apple knows there depended on for movies. I don't think theyll mess with OSX too much knowing this. But i'm probably wrong!

Mac Pro + Lion + FCP + The Usual Adobe Bloatware™.

There's no problem.
 

EdbBob

macrumors member
Original poster
Oct 25, 2008
97
0
Im a script supervisor out in Hollywood for the movies. I use mac for pre production, filming, then post! All the films I've worked on have been edited on Mac Pros. Apple knows there being used everywhere in the movie industry. Every once in a while you'll find a linux program (mostly at Pixar) but mostly Apple! I think Apple knows there depended on for movies. I don't think theyll mess with OSX too much knowing this. But i'm probably wrong!

With recent development in FCPX it seem's you're right (on being wrong that is...)
 
Last edited:

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,682
43,740
With recent development in FCPX it seem's you're right (on being wrong that is...)

How so? What recent developments in FCPX, I'm not user of that app so I don't know if the updates were good/bad/indifferent.
 

macingman

macrumors 68020
Jan 2, 2011
2,147
3
Of all personal computer sales in the world, how much are by Apple? this includes IBM-based PCs, Apple Macs, etc.? Apple must have a very small share of personal computer sales, and they always have.

The iPhone and now iPad are by far their biggest selling products, so logic dictates they will focus on these now. If anything, it is these products that have made Apple sexy, so to speak.

Apple has sokething like tripled growth over PC in the last year (cant remember exact figures). Apple sells way more macs than other companies sell PCs.
 

MonkeySee....

macrumors 68040
Sep 24, 2010
3,858
437
UK
You'll hear people falsely claim that "Apple abandoned the mac for iDevices blah blah"

All it takes is one quick look to see this is completely false. Look how many times iDevices update in a year. Once. Look how many times Macs update in a year, lots more (it varies year to year).

What people don't understand is Apple doesn't have thousands of engineers. They have a small development team for such a large company. What people also don't understand is Apple makes money on hardware, not software. If you ask most people on this board how they started with Macs a lot will say their first experience is with an iDevice. What better way to rope people into the mac world then with a small, fairly inexpensive device to get them hooked on the Apple way of things.

Very good post!

I always liked apple but just couldn't afford a Mac. Got the iPhone 3gs and I had to get an iMac. I got hooked in to the Apple world an i don't want to leave.

Looking forward to Lion :D
 
Last edited:

*LTD*

macrumors G4
Feb 5, 2009
10,703
1
Canada
Which is exactly what the op and many others are afraid of. Not being able to get actual work done on their favourite machines. Macs/iToys will be cool gadgets for twitter & facebook this way.

We'll bet getting "actual work" (whatever that means) done on them just the same. Everything evolves. There's already been a ridiculous amount of development.

Welcome to the Post-PC Era. More than "fake work."

If you think that these devices will be limited and consigned to Facebook and Twitter, you'll be in for quite a surprise. But see, that's how the competition thinks as well: small and unimaginative. It took Apple to show everyone the possibilities.
 

Hellhammer

Moderator emeritus
Dec 10, 2008
22,164
582
Finland
We'll bet getting "actual work" (whatever that means) done on them just the same. Everything evolves. There's already been a ridiculous amount of development.

What if your work involves enormous amounts of writing? Or not even work, just your general usage. Am I supposed to do that on 9.7" iPad with virtual keyboard and reduce my efficiency significantly? Add a physical separate keyboard and you got a regular desktop with touch screen. Add a physical non-separate KB and you got a laptop with touch screen.

I've asked this question from you several times but you have never replied. Just because tablets do everything you do doesn't mean that that applies to everyone.
 

KnightWRX

macrumors Pentium
Jan 28, 2009
15,046
4
Quebec, Canada
So are Tablets. And smartphones to an extent.

Smartphones are computers too. My car's ECU is very much a computer too.

Computer is a very broad and general term to describe a machine that takes input, processes it, optionally stores it and provides output. Input doesn't need to be a keyboard or mouse, it can be sensors. Output doesn't need to be a screen or printer, it can be electrical signals to relays and switches. Storage doesn't need to be a hardware, it can be NVRAM, continuously powered DRAM or SRAM, etc..

Anyway, back to the thread topic, which is both old and get necro'd :

"If I were running Apple, I would milk the Macintosh for all it's worth -- and get busy on the next great thing. The PC wars are over. Done. Microsoft won a long time ago."
-- Steve Jobs, Fortune, Feb. 19, 1996

That's the man's plan folks. It's all going exactly according to plan. It's just the Mac cow is running dry for Apple and the next great thing is here now.


What if your work involves enormous amounts of writing? Or not even work, just your general usage. Am I supposed to do that on 9.7" iPad with virtual keyboard and reduce my efficiency significantly? Add a physical separate keyboard and you got a regular desktop with touch screen. Add a physical non-separate KB and you got a laptop with touch screen.

I've asked this question from you several times but you have never replied. Just because tablets do everything you do doesn't mean that that applies to everyone.

The man is blind to what the iPad revolution is exactly. Is it the form factor ? No, of course not, that is rather limited as you pointed out. Tablets as a form factor have never really caught on.

What about the iPad is different ? It's the iOS and the new paradigms it brings. No more filesystem, no more complex application hierarchies, Zero configuration. All the complexity hidden behind a walled garden of simplicity. This is the true revolution. People are scooping up iPads not because they want a tablet, those are awkward to carry around on work on, but because they want a device that "it just works!". Bring the iPad like OS to laptops, desktops, tablets, smartphones, create one big enough ecosystem and make sure the APIs are sufficient to build advanced software without breaking the simplicity of the system, and you've just "reinvented" the PC.

That is the true revolution. The tablet thing is just a fad like Netbooks. A compromise on everything.
 

*LTD*

macrumors G4
Feb 5, 2009
10,703
1
Canada
What if your work involves enormous amounts of writing? Or not even work, just your general usage. Am I supposed to do that on 9.7" iPad with virtual keyboard and reduce my efficiency significantly? Add a physical separate keyboard and you got a regular desktop with touch screen. Add a physical non-separate KB and you got a laptop with touch screen.

I've asked this question from you several times but you have never replied. Just because tablets do everything you do doesn't mean that that applies to everyone.

You're not getting it. Use a Mac during the transition period. As for "enormous amounts of writing", I don't have that answer. But Apple, the industry, and developers will. There's a good chance that it won't be what you expect, and it won't involve traditional computing.

Think beyond the next 24-48 hours. If Steve Jobs did and came up with THAT, then I'm sure you can manage just a fraction of that in order to gain a broader perspective.
 

Hellhammer

Moderator emeritus
Dec 10, 2008
22,164
582
Finland
You're not getting it. Use a Mac during the transition period. As for "enormous amounts of writing", I don't have that answer. But Apple, the industry, and developers will. There's a good chance that it won't be what you expect, and it won't involve traditional computing.

Think beyond the next 24-48 hours. If Steve Jobs did and came up with THAT, then I'm sure you can manage just a fraction of that in order to gain a broader perspective.

So you admit that tablets are very limited machines, at least at the moment? You are only speculating that Apple will be able to solve the input issue of tablets but you can't even offer a solution. Until that happens, tablets will be very limited machines with very limited use.
 

KnightWRX

macrumors Pentium
Jan 28, 2009
15,046
4
Quebec, Canada
So you admit that tablets are very limited machines, at least at the moment? You are only speculating that Apple will be able to solve the input issue of tablets but you can't even offer a solution. Until that happens, tablets will be very limited machines with very limited use.

Apple already did solve the problem : Laptops. Now all that remains is to fit the iOS type revolution on there and Steve's plan will be complete. It is absolutely where all this is going, no matter how much we don't like it.
 

Hellhammer

Moderator emeritus
Dec 10, 2008
22,164
582
Finland
Apple already did solve the problem : Laptops. Now all that remains is to fit the iOS type revolution on there and Steve's plan will be complete. It is absolutely where all this is going, no matter how much we don't like it.

Yeah, well Apple solved that issue much before we even imagined about tablets then :p I agree with you that what we will see is that OS X will get more iOS-like or maybe at one point there will only be iOS (or whatever it will be called then). What I was asking is that why does *LTD* think that tablets will replace traditional computers, especially when we consider the shortcomings of tablets.
 

KnightWRX

macrumors Pentium
Jan 28, 2009
15,046
4
Quebec, Canada
Yeah, well Apple solved that issue much before we even imagined about tablets then :p I agree with you that what we will see is that OS X will get more iOS-like or maybe at one point there will only be iOS (or whatever it will be called then). What I was asking is that why does *LTD* think that tablets will replace traditional computers, especially when we consider the shortcomings of tablets.

Because *LTD* is shortsighed and can't see what the "Post-PC" era really means. It's not about Tablets. It's not about smartphones, it's a software revolution.

iOS like operating systems, where everything is sandboxed, self-contained, easy to install, easy to clean-up and requires zero management will replace "traditional" operating systems.

Windows 8 is a hint of that. iOS and Lion are others. Tablets are just a marketing tool to get people used to liking that sort of stuff. Once people are used to it, it'll start showing up on ultra-portables laptops "for convenience". Then it'll be full fledged laptops and before we know it, desktops too.
 

singlestick

macrumors regular
Apr 21, 2011
116
0
Southern California
So you admit that tablets are very limited machines, at least at the moment? You are only speculating that Apple will be able to solve the input issue of tablets but you can't even offer a solution. Until that happens, tablets will be very limited machines with very limited use.

Of course tablets are limited. So are smartphones, but this has not stopped millions of people from buying them. So, what is your point?
 

Hellhammer

Moderator emeritus
Dec 10, 2008
22,164
582
Finland
Of course tablets are limited. So are smartphones, but this has not stopped millions of people from buying them. So, what is your point?

That the tablet form factor will not replace traditional laptops and/or desktops like *LTD* is suggesting. Nor will tablets be suitable for everyone's usage. There is definitely market for tablets like the sales figures show but that doesn't mean they will replace something.
 

singlestick

macrumors regular
Apr 21, 2011
116
0
Southern California
That the tablet form factor will not replace traditional laptops and/or desktops like *LTD* is suggesting. Nor will tablets be suitable for everyone's usage. There is definitely market for tablets like the sales figures show but that doesn't mean they will replace something.

Ah, I see. But still, who knows. The mouse is an essential device and PCs assume their use, but people laughed at the mouse when it was first introduced. I used to be amazed at the people who would type on smartphone keyboards just using their thumbs.

I agree that tablets will not replace laptops. For now. But if Apple seamlessly cuts the cord, you may find that there are people whose only devices are tablets and smartphones. This might spur innovations to let these people use the devices more effectively, without thinking about laptops at all.
 

*LTD*

macrumors G4
Feb 5, 2009
10,703
1
Canada
Because *LTD* is shortsighed and can't see what the "Post-PC" era really means. It's not about Tablets. It's not about smartphones, it's a software revolution.

iOS like operating systems, where everything is sandboxed, self-contained, easy to install, easy to clean-up and requires zero management will replace "traditional" operating systems.

Windows 8 is a hint of that. iOS and Lion are others. Tablets are just a marketing tool to get people used to liking that sort of stuff. Once people are used to it, it'll start showing up on ultra-portables laptops "for convenience". Then it'll be full fledged laptops and before we know it, desktops too.

I agree with this perspective as well. But great software has to runs on great devices. ;)

As for your second paragraph, I'm in agreement as well. I'm just not sure how touch-based activity will show up on laptops - a device which is really unsuited to touch. Of course, software is going to evolve (and become simpler and more accessible), but input method is also changing.
 

maclaptop

macrumors 65816
Apr 8, 2011
1,453
0
Western Hemisphere
For a period of time in 2010, it appeared all iOS.

But lately, and I mean very recently, I tend to think that Apple is going to go in whatever direction the money goes.

Apple is a money addict, and that falls in line neatly with those who's self esteem is bolstered by "being seen" with cool stuff.

More often than not in the USA especially, it's a shallow environment where toys matter more than family... Sad but true.
 

Hellhammer

Moderator emeritus
Dec 10, 2008
22,164
582
Finland
I agree that tablets will not replace laptops. For now. But if Apple seamlessly cuts the cord, you may find that there are people whose only devices are tablets and smartphones. This might spur innovations to let these people use the devices more effectively, without thinking about laptops at all.

No doubt that tablets will be fine for some people as their main computers, but not everyone (which was my point). In fact, my dad has been using his iPad as his main computer for the last month because he has been traveling. He only browses the web and uses email so iPad is sufficient for him, and he likes the iPad a lot. I no longer have to help him as much as I used to when he was using a PC/Mac.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.