Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is there some RAM testing program I should run?
Note that no memory testing program that runs under an operating system can thoroughly test memory. Use the BIOS level testing, or boot memtest86 from a USB thumb drive.

If you install Windows, it will install a UEFI memory test that you can run.
 
  • Like
Reactions: paulchiu
Note that no memory testing program that runs under an operating system can thoroughly test memory. Use the BIOS level testing, or boot memtest86 from a USB thumb drive.

If you install Windows, it will install a UEFI memory test that you can run.


Yes,
will be installing Parallels Desktop and Win 10 for some business work stuff. will look for that UEFI
 
I think I will just run GeekBench 5 with the 32GB factory and then with the 768GB.
Heavy computations and use over the next 2 weeks should tell me if the RAM is good.
[automerge]1578530939[/automerge]


I have a thought . Why not install Windows 10 in your MP7,1 and then run the Windows version of Memtest on the whole configuration ? It shouldn't matter what OS is used , only that the modules are verified to be good .

The only wildcard is exactly how long the test would take .
[automerge]1578540501[/automerge]
Note that no memory testing program that runs under an operating system can thoroughly test memory. Use the BIOS level testing, or boot memtest86 from a USB thumb drive.

That's true and running the single user command line version of a memory test will produce more accurate results . And that might be the way Memtest for Mac will run with modern Systems .

In the old days , I used to do precisely that but discovered it would not permit , of course , me to perform a System load test ( where all major components are placed under concurrent and continuous loads . Sort of a Super Test to shake out any defects in a Build .

But we're still back to the wildcard ... How long will the test take to completion ? The OP needs his Mac for production reasons .

Not just to run tests all day for the MacRumorati :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: paulchiu
Hello,

Just wanted to share another option:


I'm expecting my Mac Pro and 6 of these modules to arrive tomorrow. From what I can tell, these are rebranded Samsung modules, but less expensive.
 
Hello,

Just wanted to share another option:


I'm expecting my Mac Pro and 6 of these modules to arrive tomorrow. From what I can tell, these are rebranded Samsung modules, but less expensive.

Supermicro's list of qualified memory modules for a similar system is a very good source of info .
 
Hello,

Just wanted to share another option:


I'm expecting my Mac Pro and 6 of these modules to arrive tomorrow. From what I can tell, these are rebranded Samsung modules, but less expensive.

They charge sales tax to New York State, still cheaper than Memory 4 less and OWC
 
Does anyone here used Nemix RAM before and how does it perform compared to Samsung/ Hynix RAM?
 
Does anyone here used Nemix RAM before and how does it perform compared to Samsung/ Hynix RAM?

I was ready to buy Nemix RAM from Amazon, but I noticed that the seller began steadily raising the price from mid-December until now. The 64 GB (2 x 32 GB DIMMs) kit was $192 less than a month ago, but the seller has now raised the price to almost $300! That's what prompted me to get the Supermicro option mentioned above from NewEgg. It wasn't $192, but it was still much cheaper for a single 64 GB DIMM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OkiRun
Does anyone here used Nemix RAM before and how does it perform compared to Samsung/ Hynix RAM?

Nemix was mentioned by Youtube stars since December 2019 but their prices skyrocketed too much for 32GB, 64GB and up. I could not find out who makes the chips; whether Hynix, Samsung, Micron, etc.
In the end, I bought Samsung from the cheapest out there and that was memory.net
 
  • Like
Reactions: OkiRun
Does anyone here used Nemix RAM before and how does it perform compared to Samsung/ Hynix RAM?
I ordered some at the pre-gouging prices and they arrive soon. Mac Pro arrives next week and XDR next month - so it will be sometime before I can give you feedback. Would not reorder at the new price list.
 
  • Like
Reactions: paulchiu
I was ready to buy Nemix RAM from Amazon, but I noticed that the seller began steadily raising the price from mid-December until now. The 64 GB (2 x 32 GB DIMMs) kit was $192 less than a month ago, but the seller has now raised the price to almost $300! That's what prompted me to get the Supermicro option mentioned above from NewEgg. It wasn't $192, but it was still much cheaper for a single 64 GB DIMM.
Wow, I didn't expect they will raise the price.

Nemix was mentioned by Youtube stars since December 2019 but their prices skyrocketed too much for 32GB, 64GB and up. I could not find out who makes the chips; whether Hynix, Samsung, Micron, etc.
In the end, I bought Samsung from the cheapest out there and that was memory.net
Yeah, Nemix is mentioned anywhere by blogger (Macrumors), vblogger.

I ordered some at the pre-gouging prices and they arrive soon. Mac Pro arrives next week and XDR next month - so it will be sometime before I can give you feedback. Would not reorder at the new price list.

Mine is arriving tomorrow but I still haven't got the RAM yet. I'm thinking if the MP7.1 will work with 1 stick of 128GB RAM
 
Does anyone here used Nemix RAM before and how does it perform compared to Samsung/ Hynix RAM?
The Nemix RAM I purchased is made by Samsung. Part number is M393A4K40CB2-CVF for all of my 32GB modules.
 
Update .

I was able to run Memtest for Mac on my MP7,1 using macOS 10.15.3 Beta Catalina .

However , only 22 GB are able to be tested out of a System total of 32 GB .

Hardly ideal .

I will run the test in single user command line mode later to see if I can get a greater amount of installed memory tested .
 
  • Like
Reactions: OkiRun
I will run the test in single user command line mode later to see if I can get a greater amount of installed memory tested .
You'll never come close to 100% with the Apple OSX running.

When memtest86 is run from a thumb drive, it has a very small footprint.

Not only that, it will move the test kernel into already tested memory, and then test where the kernel was initially loaded.
 
Yay!

MacPro arrived and my back is killing me already.
Looking for an all nighter to test and populate this BEAUTIFUL BEAST!

Pro Display XDR still Feb 17

IMG_6180.JPG





IMG_6240.jpg



IMG_6241.jpg
 
OK, running Mac Pro for a few hours now.

With base 32GB RAM
1. Geekbench 1179 17,578
2. Cinebench 9885

With 768GB RAM
1. GeekBench 1177 20,708
2. Cinebench 9928

Screen Shot 2020-01-09 at 11.26.35 PM.png
Screen Shot 2020-01-10 at 12.48.02 AM.png
 
You'll never come close to 100% with the Apple OSX running.

When memtest86 is run from a thumb drive, it has a very small footprint.

Not only that, it will move the test kernel into already tested memory, and then test where the kernel was initially loaded.

You're absolutely right . But I needed to verify that memtest86 would actually work without any issues on a MP7,1 . Guess what ? It works fine . I was able to install that program onto an USB thumb drive and run a test with an Option command at start up to access the Startup Manager . It took a long time to boot . Some 5 to 10 minutes . And it took around 10 hours to test 32GB ( 4 x 8GB ) of memory using four passes with all individual test components selected . That's a long time ! But the memory passed inspection . Maybe I should use a faster USB drive - I can always make a flash SSD USB thumb drive if I need to . Something with a real seriously fast drive controller . Heavy on the IOPS and maybe 500 MB/s throughput . The cheap $5 USB thumb drive I used this time was probably a punishment ... BTW , I was able to test 31.9 GB out of 32.0 GB doing this .

IMG_0376.jpg
 
Last edited:
You're absolutely right . But I needed to verify that memtest86 would actually work without any issues on a MP7,1 . Guess what ? It works fine . I was able to install that program onto an USB thumb drive and run a test with an Option command at start up to access the Startup Manager . It took a long time to boot . Some 5 to 10 minutes . And it took around 10 hours to test 32GB ( 4 x 8GB ) of memory using four passes with all individual test components selected . That's a long time ! But the memory passed inspection . Maybe I should use a faster USB drive - I can always make a flash SSD USB thumb drive if I need to . Something with a real seriously fast drive controller . Heavy on the IOPS and maybe 500 MB/s throughput . The cheap $5 USB thumb drive I used this time was probably a punishment ... BTW , I was able to test 31.9 GB out of 32.0 GB doing this .

View attachment 888190


Thanks for this. I am not venturing into testing my 768GB RAM cluster as it would take weeks to complete. So far, my system has been running continuously for 3 days. No fan noise at all even at times with all cores working.
 
Thanks for this. I am not venturing into testing my 768GB RAM cluster as it would take weeks to complete. So far, my system has been running continuously for 3 days. No fan noise at all even at times with all cores working.

The test will probably be much quicker with a faster USB thumb drive . I'll be building one soon for my shop , because my current test drive is just horribly slow . But the method is solid and I appreciate getting results using the only working memory test for Catalina ( except whatever Apple has with GSX , which the average user will never have direct access to ) .
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.