Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Is there some RAM testing program I should run?
Note that no memory testing program that runs under an operating system can thoroughly test memory. Use the BIOS level testing, or boot memtest86 from a USB thumb drive.

If you install Windows, it will install a UEFI memory test that you can run.
 
  • Like
Reactions: paulchiu
Note that no memory testing program that runs under an operating system can thoroughly test memory. Use the BIOS level testing, or boot memtest86 from a USB thumb drive.

If you install Windows, it will install a UEFI memory test that you can run.


Yes,
will be installing Parallels Desktop and Win 10 for some business work stuff. will look for that UEFI
 
I think I will just run GeekBench 5 with the 32GB factory and then with the 768GB.
Heavy computations and use over the next 2 weeks should tell me if the RAM is good.
[automerge]1578530939[/automerge]


I have a thought . Why not install Windows 10 in your MP7,1 and then run the Windows version of Memtest on the whole configuration ? It shouldn't matter what OS is used , only that the modules are verified to be good .

The only wildcard is exactly how long the test would take .
[automerge]1578540501[/automerge]
Note that no memory testing program that runs under an operating system can thoroughly test memory. Use the BIOS level testing, or boot memtest86 from a USB thumb drive.

That's true and running the single user command line version of a memory test will produce more accurate results . And that might be the way Memtest for Mac will run with modern Systems .

In the old days , I used to do precisely that but discovered it would not permit , of course , me to perform a System load test ( where all major components are placed under concurrent and continuous loads . Sort of a Super Test to shake out any defects in a Build .

But we're still back to the wildcard ... How long will the test take to completion ? The OP needs his Mac for production reasons .

Not just to run tests all day for the MacRumorati :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: paulchiu
Hello,

Just wanted to share another option:


I'm expecting my Mac Pro and 6 of these modules to arrive tomorrow. From what I can tell, these are rebranded Samsung modules, but less expensive.
 
Hello,

Just wanted to share another option:


I'm expecting my Mac Pro and 6 of these modules to arrive tomorrow. From what I can tell, these are rebranded Samsung modules, but less expensive.

Supermicro's list of qualified memory modules for a similar system is a very good source of info .
 
Hello,

Just wanted to share another option:


I'm expecting my Mac Pro and 6 of these modules to arrive tomorrow. From what I can tell, these are rebranded Samsung modules, but less expensive.

They charge sales tax to New York State, still cheaper than Memory 4 less and OWC
 
Does anyone here used Nemix RAM before and how does it perform compared to Samsung/ Hynix RAM?
 
Does anyone here used Nemix RAM before and how does it perform compared to Samsung/ Hynix RAM?

I was ready to buy Nemix RAM from Amazon, but I noticed that the seller began steadily raising the price from mid-December until now. The 64 GB (2 x 32 GB DIMMs) kit was $192 less than a month ago, but the seller has now raised the price to almost $300! That's what prompted me to get the Supermicro option mentioned above from NewEgg. It wasn't $192, but it was still much cheaper for a single 64 GB DIMM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OkiRun
Does anyone here used Nemix RAM before and how does it perform compared to Samsung/ Hynix RAM?

Nemix was mentioned by Youtube stars since December 2019 but their prices skyrocketed too much for 32GB, 64GB and up. I could not find out who makes the chips; whether Hynix, Samsung, Micron, etc.
In the end, I bought Samsung from the cheapest out there and that was memory.net
 
  • Like
Reactions: OkiRun
Does anyone here used Nemix RAM before and how does it perform compared to Samsung/ Hynix RAM?
I ordered some at the pre-gouging prices and they arrive soon. Mac Pro arrives next week and XDR next month - so it will be sometime before I can give you feedback. Would not reorder at the new price list.
 
  • Like
Reactions: paulchiu
I was ready to buy Nemix RAM from Amazon, but I noticed that the seller began steadily raising the price from mid-December until now. The 64 GB (2 x 32 GB DIMMs) kit was $192 less than a month ago, but the seller has now raised the price to almost $300! That's what prompted me to get the Supermicro option mentioned above from NewEgg. It wasn't $192, but it was still much cheaper for a single 64 GB DIMM.
Wow, I didn't expect they will raise the price.

Nemix was mentioned by Youtube stars since December 2019 but their prices skyrocketed too much for 32GB, 64GB and up. I could not find out who makes the chips; whether Hynix, Samsung, Micron, etc.
In the end, I bought Samsung from the cheapest out there and that was memory.net
Yeah, Nemix is mentioned anywhere by blogger (Macrumors), vblogger.

I ordered some at the pre-gouging prices and they arrive soon. Mac Pro arrives next week and XDR next month - so it will be sometime before I can give you feedback. Would not reorder at the new price list.

Mine is arriving tomorrow but I still haven't got the RAM yet. I'm thinking if the MP7.1 will work with 1 stick of 128GB RAM
 
Does anyone here used Nemix RAM before and how does it perform compared to Samsung/ Hynix RAM?
The Nemix RAM I purchased is made by Samsung. Part number is M393A4K40CB2-CVF for all of my 32GB modules.
 
Update .

I was able to run Memtest for Mac on my MP7,1 using macOS 10.15.3 Beta Catalina .

However , only 22 GB are able to be tested out of a System total of 32 GB .

Hardly ideal .

I will run the test in single user command line mode later to see if I can get a greater amount of installed memory tested .
 
  • Like
Reactions: OkiRun
I will run the test in single user command line mode later to see if I can get a greater amount of installed memory tested .
You'll never come close to 100% with the Apple OSX running.

When memtest86 is run from a thumb drive, it has a very small footprint.

Not only that, it will move the test kernel into already tested memory, and then test where the kernel was initially loaded.
 
OK, running Mac Pro for a few hours now.

With base 32GB RAM
1. Geekbench 1179 17,578
2. Cinebench 9885

With 768GB RAM
1. GeekBench 1177 20,708
2. Cinebench 9928

Screen Shot 2020-01-09 at 11.26.35 PM.png
Screen Shot 2020-01-10 at 12.48.02 AM.png
 
You'll never come close to 100% with the Apple OSX running.

When memtest86 is run from a thumb drive, it has a very small footprint.

Not only that, it will move the test kernel into already tested memory, and then test where the kernel was initially loaded.

You're absolutely right . But I needed to verify that memtest86 would actually work without any issues on a MP7,1 . Guess what ? It works fine . I was able to install that program onto an USB thumb drive and run a test with an Option command at start up to access the Startup Manager . It took a long time to boot . Some 5 to 10 minutes . And it took around 10 hours to test 32GB ( 4 x 8GB ) of memory using four passes with all individual test components selected . That's a long time ! But the memory passed inspection . Maybe I should use a faster USB drive - I can always make a flash SSD USB thumb drive if I need to . Something with a real seriously fast drive controller . Heavy on the IOPS and maybe 500 MB/s throughput . The cheap $5 USB thumb drive I used this time was probably a punishment ... BTW , I was able to test 31.9 GB out of 32.0 GB doing this .

IMG_0376.jpg
 
Last edited:
You're absolutely right . But I needed to verify that memtest86 would actually work without any issues on a MP7,1 . Guess what ? It works fine . I was able to install that program onto an USB thumb drive and run a test with an Option command at start up to access the Startup Manager . It took a long time to boot . Some 5 to 10 minutes . And it took around 10 hours to test 32GB ( 4 x 8GB ) of memory using four passes with all individual test components selected . That's a long time ! But the memory passed inspection . Maybe I should use a faster USB drive - I can always make a flash SSD USB thumb drive if I need to . Something with a real seriously fast drive controller . Heavy on the IOPS and maybe 500 MB/s throughput . The cheap $5 USB thumb drive I used this time was probably a punishment ... BTW , I was able to test 31.9 GB out of 32.0 GB doing this .

View attachment 888190


Thanks for this. I am not venturing into testing my 768GB RAM cluster as it would take weeks to complete. So far, my system has been running continuously for 3 days. No fan noise at all even at times with all cores working.
 
Thanks for this. I am not venturing into testing my 768GB RAM cluster as it would take weeks to complete. So far, my system has been running continuously for 3 days. No fan noise at all even at times with all cores working.

The test will probably be much quicker with a faster USB thumb drive . I'll be building one soon for my shop , because my current test drive is just horribly slow . But the method is solid and I appreciate getting results using the only working memory test for Catalina ( except whatever Apple has with GSX , which the average user will never have direct access to ) .
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.