Perhaps you really don't find them useless.Why I keep buying Apple Watches if theyre useless? I dont know.
Not 7 ft but 6’4”. 45mm is comically small for me. Also, the larger the screen is the more space will be for content, more complications, etc. Also hopping for more battery life.
Were you making this up or did you actually have some inside info? I was surprised to see this in the tech news today and I’m all for it too:
Apple Watch Series 8 may feature 50.5mm display
https://appleinsider.com/articles/2...es-8-may-feature-505mm-display?utm_medium=rss
Yep, I see that now. When I read it, initially, it did say 50.5, very close to what the OP wanted.The article has been edited and only mentions 47mm as a possible larger size.
Apple Watch is lugless so 45 mm is like a 40 mm with lugs - way too small. I am tired of toy-like Watch sizes. We need a bigger size and more importantly way longer battery life. At least 3-4 days. If Garmin can do 6 days with Epix I am sure Apple can too.Yep, I see that now. When I read it, initially, it did say 50.5, very close to what the OP wanted.
I thought 50.5 is very large for a watch but I’d probably still rock it. To each their own. I see the Apple Watch as more of a wrist worn computer with a time telling feature than a time piece with other functionality. Why I’m opposed to a round Apple Watch.
I’m with ya... All for a larger Apple Watch. To me, it’s a wrist worn computer first. I just hope they never go round. The rumored/leaked UI on the upcoming Google watch looks horrendous. Same for previous round smart watches I’ve owned (Motorola, Samsung, LG Google)Apple Watch is lugless so 45 mm is like a 40 mm with lugs - way too small. I am tired of toy-like Watch sizes. We need a bigger size and more importantly way longer battery life. At least 3-4 days. If Garmin can do 6 days with Epix I am sure Apple can too.
I've often thought it would be a good idea to make the AW rectangular. Slightly longer along the arm than across.
that would allow a larger battery and more screen space.
Whatdoyamean?........mine is a phone!Why do you need 49mm? This is a watch, not a phone.
Not 7 ft but 6’4”. 45mm is comically small for me. Also, the larger the screen is the more space will be for content, more complications, etc. Also hopping for more battery life.
I am still rocking the AW4, it works great and tracks all my bike rides through strava flawlessly.
That is my use case of the AW4 after almost 4 years of daily usage, it is severely limited because the watch functions are severely limited.
- Occational handsfree call
- Tracking excersizes via the Strava app
- checking Crypto stats.
Apple need to put focus on the software, make measurements more accurate, give us a personal AI trainer that goes way beyond the glorified speech to text SIRI.
Something that helps us organise our life better by learning to know us in a offline method so your data is not out there. helping you to train better and more accurate for your needs, helping you with chores and reminders based on GPS and your habbits when you are at these places.
Make the smartwatch actually Smart!
Yea size don't matter much. If your eyes need bigger screens, go with that. Nothing wrong . And don't worry about what others think, just be yourself. Always. As you know yourself more than anyone.I think it is totally in line with how watches looked pre-Apple watch, but most of us have gotten used to the look of bigger sizes now, so that it does look pretty small in relation to the “modern” look.
I wear a 45 on my 145mm wrist, which I’m sure looks too big to some, but my eyes are terrible and need the biggest text size I can get, so I don’t care.