Very true, of course, with the massive system requirements Windows 7 is sure to have, the perofrmance hit probably wouldn't be noticeableA) the laptop user DEF will get saddled with poor WiFi performance, because in addition to his own bandwidth consumption, the bandwidth being used by GHI, JKL and MNO are all being passed through him too.
This isn't something automatic that would happen whenever you open your laptop, this sort of thing is something you'd have to set up. So yes, if DEF shuts down, the rest of the networks are gone, but it's unlikely you would set this up in an environment where laptops are coming and going, it's more for stationary desktops that don't move. But you're not just going to open your laptop at Starbucks and suddenly be a repeater on their network.B) the laptop user DEF finishes his Latte at the fringe of the coffee shop's WIFI coverage, shuts down his laptop and goes back to work ... the rest of the tag-along 'hitchhikers' go from a decent relay signal to zero signal and their sessions crash and burn.
As with any wireless network, secure it.C) if I'm paying for bandwidth and have this turned on, did I not just invite freeloaders to hitchhike on my connection ... and for which I'm footing the bill? When one of them does something illegal, am I liable?
Yes, that would be correct.D) suppose that the laptop user GHI has a WiFi eavesdropper (either malware, or he's not a white hat). Would this not mean that all of the traffic that he's helping "pass through" from/to JKL and MNO has now had its security compromised?
Pretty much. The commercials will contain more fail than the laptop hunter ads combined.IMO, it is obvious that this feature is going to be used as a marketing hype advertisement, to illustrate how Windows is "better" than other systems. The commercial will be to show a Mac getting zero bars and the PC getting a solid connection...
The only situation where I can see the need for wireless repeaters is a large, enterprise environment such as a business or college campus. It's not a bad idea for home users, but most people live in a small enough house where one wireless router will cover the entire house, and then some. And in an enterprise environment, I can pretty much guarantee you that they wouldn't even be using repeaters like this. They'll have individual access points each plugged into the wired network so there isn't a single point of failure, effectively creating one huge network all under the same SSID so you can move freely around the building/campus without changing wireless networks...the device will automatically hop onto the new base station when one with a stronger signal comes into range, the same way cell phone networks work.Granted, it could be a reasonably decent idea in a trusting, benevolent IT setting (particularly if there's not one node at each DEF but dozens...preventing single point of failure in a network web), but the unfortunate reality is that this sort of computing environment hasn't existed for well over a decade, plus its creation of coverage relies on statistics, both for the availability of users as well as the ubiquity of that particular version of Windows. Even if it technically works, it will take time for broad adoption to pragmatically make it reliably available.
Maybe one useful situation for that at home is if you have a guest over, and don't want to give them the password to your main wireless network so you create one in Windows 7 with a different password. But if I'm trusting someone enough to stay in my home, I can trust them with my WiFi network key. So I'm really thinking this feature is a gimmick so MS can claim Windows can do something that Mac's dont (other than BSOD and get infected with garbage ) .