Get bigger pants?
No, just bigger pockets ? Or you could always settle for a fanny pack ?
Get bigger pants?
only offering 6.7" size phones now.
That's my guess, and I'd buy that when my mini breaks!I hate that there wont be a mini 14. As a mini 12 owner was looking forward to the upgrade.
My hope is that the mini becomes the new SE. I would like a mini pro, but I’ll take a SE with this form factor. So fingers crossed.
This would be the ideal compromise. Updating the Mini line every 2 years. Maybe Apple will update the 13 Mini to a 15 Mini if we are lucky.I hope they occasionally update, like the iPad mini. Might not sell enough to update every year, but worth having one in the lineup for people that don’t like having sore wrists
sales and really apple thought the market for a smaller phone would be more popular but clearly not up to their sales standards.I've heard that Apple is going to cancel the iPhone miniseries this year. But why? That was a great phone.
Hopefully you aren’t. I’d really like to see the next iPhone SE with a 5.7” LCD display, because OLED offers a superior image quality but some people are uncomfortable using it (like myself) because of PMW.Apple do recognise the market for small iphones, the man himself Tim Cook, addressed this when unveiling the SE3 where he specifically stated that the SE line caters to those who like 'small iphones'. Watch it back if you don't believe me. So hopefully the next SE4 will not be based on the XR/11 chassis as its too big, but rather the 5.8" iphone chassis (rumours state it will have a thicker bezel to make it 5.7"). But it may be the end of the line for 'premium' priced small iphones like the 12/13 mini, hopefully I'm wrong though.
I cant remember exactly, but it was on macrumours and was also discussed in some other previous MR threads about small iphones and the iphone SE. Other members may be able to chime in on this with the exact source.Hopefully you aren’t. I’d really like to see the next iPhone SE with a 5.7” LCD display, because OLED offers a superior image quality but some people are uncomfortable using it (like myself) because of PMW.
By the way, where did you read that rumor? Is it based on the Ross Young tweet?
Yeah, that’s Ross Young’s tweet. Let’s hope he’s right and next SE carries a 5.7” LCD screen. He’s one of the most accurate leakers so far.I cant remember exactly, but it was on macrumours and was also discussed in some other previous MR threads about small iphones and the iphone SE. Other members may be able to chime in on this with the exact source.
Edit - Found it:
In the last earnings report, Tim stated the iPhone SE if the perfect phone for those looking for affordable smaller phones.Apple do recognise the market for small iphones, the man himself Tim Cook, addressed this when unveiling the SE3 where he specifically stated that the SE line caters to those who like 'small iphones'. Watch it back if you don't believe me. So hopefully the next SE4 will not be based on the XR/11 chassis as its too big, but rather the 5.8" iphone chassis (rumours state it will have a thicker bezel to make it 5.7"). But it may be the end of the line for 'premium' priced small iphones like the 12/13 mini, hopefully I'm wrong though.
Yeah, I think most people who own the SE will want it to stay smaller. I’ve owned both the XR & 11 (just switched from the 11 to SE3) and they are much bigger and heavier in the hand, and after years of Plus sized phones I am much happier with the SE’s form factor today.In the last earnings report, Tim stated the iPhone SE if the perfect phone for those looking for affordable smaller phones.
Except it was. The Original SE was $250 less than the 6s. The 12 and 13 mini were only $100 less than the 12 and 13. Also the battery life on the Original SE was better than on the 6s. The 12 and 13 mini really only were attractive to those of us who specially wanted a small iPhone, there aren’t any other significant benefits. For $100 more you could get a bigger screen AND significantly better battery life.Ahahah
iPhone SE is cheaper than mini but isn’t sell like mini. I understand some people need a simple world but it isn’t: this point of view walk around from 2016 with first SE that was priced not so far from 6s, and SE was a good product in term of sells.
Someone wants small phones, could be a little target, but not everyone who buy a small phone want a cheap phone: the market is full of cheap phones, even cheaper than small ones.
Maybe too many people confuse the size of their phone with something else.
Loved this reveal!I thought it was going to be a great product and everyone wanted an iPhone Mini. However, it's not making any money to Apple anymore. I also thought the introduction of iPhone Mini was cool too. One of a kind!
Adding to your point a redditor on the Android subreddit argued people who prefer to have a small phone because they already have other large screen devices are actually a privileged minority. For many people (especially in emerging countries) their smartphones are the only internet device they can afford and that audience would naturally graviate towards whatever phone is the biggest that fits their budget.The thing is, in 2022 people don't want or need multiple devices.
Large displayed devices are a must for practically everyone. If you look at all markets, large screen devices completely dominate as it's what people actually want.
I would hope that maybe next year Apple will finally retire the iPhone SE in its current outdated form and perhaps adopt the iPhone Mini chassis so at least there's still a small cheaper budget offering for those that want it.
To sum up, loving small phones tells three things about you (of course there are exceptions):
- You are relatively tall so you can use phones like Sony Compacts with one hand
- You are relatively wealthy and you don't rely on your phone as your only smart device
- You have a fairly active lifestyle as a phablet beats a compact phone at sofa usage no matter the size of your hands
Adding to your point a redditor on the Android subreddit argued people who prefer to have a small phone because they already have other large screen devices are actually a privileged minority. For many people (especially in emerging countries) their smartphones are the only internet device they can afford and that audience would naturally graviate towards whatever phone is the biggest that fits their budget.
Unfortunately for us the poor sales of 12 and 13 mini proved they were right.
I remember buying the SE 16 on the first day and paying it €604. The 6s presented 6 months earlier did not cost 250€ more, perhaps it cost 150€.Except it was. The Original SE was $250 less than the 6s. The 12 and 13 mini were only $100 less than the 12 and 13. Also the battery life on the Original SE was better than on the 6s. The 12 and 13 mini really only were attractive to those of us who specially wanted a small iPhone, there aren’t any other significant benefits. For $100 more you could get a bigger screen AND significantly better battery life.
Excuse me, but it seems to me an analysis devoid of any validity.That argument really doesn't even pass the sniff test. Think about it, Chromebooks are under $200. If consumers can afford a phablet, they can certainly afford another device like a notebook computer.
There is plenty of data showing adoption of phablets around the world, regardless of geographic region. Below is some data from 2015. I wouldn't consider Spain, Germany, or the UK to be emerging countries.
View attachment 2007050
What the data suggests is a generation gap. Gen X, Y, Z are increasing screen time each year. Many of them grew up without the need for a notebook or desktop. But there is a small group of middle aged and senior users who haven't increased their screen time. They still take voice calls, don't use more than an app at a time, don't use the camera, and don't mind smaller displays. This group along with price sensitive users are those hanging on to small devices.
You do realize, Apple can be uh, wrong? Consumer demand can also change.
See: HomePod, Apple Watch Edition, 12-inch MacBook
There is always "demand" for niche products like the mini but that doesn't mean Apple should satisfy everyone.
Leadership in any organization should listen, but they don't necessarily do everything everybody wants. This is because they have an obligation to do what's best for the team and overall.
View attachment 2006616
In the US the 6s was $649 and the SE was $399. Some people (and companies) most certainly got the SE over the 6s because of the larger price difference.I remember buying the SE 16 on the first day and paying it €604. The 6s presented 6 months earlier did not cost 250€ more, perhaps it cost 150€.
Of course, those who buy a mini like an SE 16 are because they think it necessary to do it, for ergonomics or something, not for money. Personally I buy small phones because I have to use them with one hand, because a phone that needs two hands to be used is a wrong product, thought out and mismade. To use it with two hands you might as well buy a tablet.
They probably won’t: they are going to sell gazillions of the new 6.7” regular iPhoneAs a mini user I am hoping the std iPhone partner alternates between mini and max year on year.
That will keep everyone happy.
People are opting for the 6.7" size phones. To me, that's the in between size which likely Apple will focus on.As a mini user I am hoping the std iPhone partner alternates between mini and max year on year.
That will keep everyone happy.