Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Gata

macrumors regular
Mar 23, 2010
248
149
I think the ARM story for future Macs is gonna turn out to be more practical and conservative. Hint, the T2 chip. Just like how the T2 chip is handling a lot of security in the 2018 MacBook Pro, that will expand to more areas of the system architecture. Intel CPUs are gonna be around primarily as a compatibility layer. Apple will use future WWDC's to encourage developers to target the A14X in the new 2020 MacBook Pro's.

I think this is a pretty sensible direction for them to go.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Dee

redheeler

macrumors G3
Oct 17, 2014
8,659
9,328
Colorado, USA
A lot of forum members are rejoicing today; it truly is a moment of relief. Many will finally upgrade their 2009 and even 2015 models. The 2018 revision is a substantial upgrade in many ways: 32 GBs of 'DDR4 RAM' (finally), T2 chip, Hey Siri, Bluetooth 5.0, Core i9, 4 TB SSD option, standard 4 GB video card. What more could you ask for?

Well, the new MacBook Pro feels like scramble to quiet the doubters. If you follow the community here on the forums and on social media, you read the comments. Apple is not innovating anymore; the touchbar is useless; the keyboard is crappy; everyone is doing DDR4 except Apple.

The new MacBook Pro starts to look more like a check box for feeds and speeds. Its not about bringing performance to the table with true value and innovation.

It still does not correct a lot of whats still wrong with this new generation:

- The keyboard is said to be better improved in terms of being quieter but it could potentially still fail. Its possible Apple was working on correcting it for this 3rd gen update, but time was against them, so they had to release what was available. This suggest, the actual improved keyboard will be coming in the June 2019 revision.

- After Phil Schillers insistence on going with LPDDR3 RAM then backtracking by going around it with a larger battery, there will be a potential for impact on battery life. We don't know for sure, but we will likely see the results over the coming months. In 2019, we will see the right type of DDR4 RAM accompanied by Canonlake which will lead to guaranteed performance and improved battery life. Apple might also pull out another surprise, built to order 64 GB configuration.

- Apple is still doing 256 GB of storage on the entry level 15 inch. Maybe, just maybe, Apple will bump this to 512 on the 15 inch model in next years rev.

- We have been on 14 NM process technology since Broadwell; since then, its been only 14+++. The 10 NM technology is coming for sure with Canonlake with guaranteed performance improvements across the board. Wouldn't you rather just jump from that Early 2015 MBP 13 inch with Broadwell to that? You would certainly be seeing more bang for your buck.

- Graphics seems to be at a stand still on the MacBook Pro, its not considered the best of breed. Its possible the work between Intel and AMD will require a little more time to deliver the value Apple needs. This would suggest we will see a more uniform lineup instead of the have and have not configurations we now see on 13 and 15 models.

- Bluetooth 5.0 is the only substantial network upgrade, but Apple is likely to introduce 802.11AD which will promise GB downloads. So, thats something you might want to wait for.

- The default and customized configurations are very expensive, even if you can afford it. I think Apple is using the best, but the best cost a lot. If you want to rollout all of these to a team of videopgraphers, its an expensive investment. The new generation has yet to see an attractive price drop. With 2019 likely to be the last of this generation, I think Apple will for the first time introduce a price drop and or more affordable specs.

- The year 2019 will be the last of this revision before Apple embarks on a redesign. This itself would make it worth the wait. The 2015 was the last revision of the MBP introduced in 2012 and so far it has been a reliable purchase. I think if you want to avoid 2016 all over again, the 2019 would be the best way to save yourself from the disadvantages of early adopter syndrome.

- Knowing that macOS 10.15 will be our first full taste of running iOS optimized apps for Mac, there is likely to be exclusive synergies between the 2019 MBP and 10.15. Yes, upsell, which means, if you want to use whatever new snazzy feature Apple introduces in 10.15 exclusive only to 2019 MBPs, example: Continuity requiring certain model Macs; or Apple Watch used to authenticate on your Mac.

So, those are just some of my thoughts. If you have been running a 2013 or earlier MBP, you will likely find the value out of the 2018 revision, but if you can stretch and squeeze a little more, you might get a way better reward in 2019.
Might want to add improved power delivery and reduced thermal throttling to the list of reasons to wait. From the recent info that has come out concerning the 2018 models, Apple screwed up badly by not even testing how the 2018 MacBook Pro i9 performed under a heavy workload. That is the bare minimum of testing I would expect to see done.
 

Nozuka

macrumors 68040
Jul 3, 2012
3,606
6,120
I will wait for a future MBP while using my 2018 MBP.
But it's going to be hard to convince me to switch, because it is a great machine and i'm not really missing anything.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whg

redheeler

macrumors G3
Oct 17, 2014
8,659
9,328
Colorado, USA
I will wait for a future MBP while using my 2018 MBP.
But it's going to be hard to convince me to switch, because it is a great machine and i'm not really missing anything.
The 13" Touch Bar models are not as prone to throttling, but they still suffer from a high price tag and the same screen res introduced in 2012. On top of that, next year's models will be receiving LPDDR4 RAM, and hopefully we'll see 16 GB become standard (with 32 GB as optional). So even with the 13", it's hard to justify getting one now.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: pkouame

Mr. Dee

macrumors 603
Original poster
Dec 4, 2003
5,990
12,840
Jamaica
Might want to add improved power delivery and reduced thermal throttling to the list of reasons to wait. From the recent info that has come out concerning the 2018 models, Apple screwed up badly by not even testing how the 2018 MacBook Pro i9 performed under a heavy workload. That is the bare minimum of testing I would expect to see done.
I'll make shorter 'It was a rushed job'
 
  • Like
Reactions: pkouame

pkouame

macrumors 65816
Jul 7, 2016
1,054
2,319
I'll make shorter 'It was a rushed job'
It's clear that Cupertino only had one thing in mind when they released this: make sure we have an i9 ready for the Quarterly Earnings call - we need to beat Amazon to 1T valuation! There is absolutely no doubt in my mind. Definitely rushed out the door on a wing and prayer. I'm just sorry for the poor suckers in Engineering who probably fell on their swords for what was essentially a poor management priority. And they talk about Courage!?
That said, it is a testament to some previous brilliant minds (no longer there) that the beautiful and functional design lasted this long. It is now showing its age, and I believe this the last cycle where using the same enclosure and molds will be viable. Even though 10nm promises to be less power hungry, something else will always take up the headroom.
I myself am one of those in a pickle: I love macOS and I need a 32G laptop for my livelihood (i run multiple VMs - windoze and many linux variants) and bursty complex compilations would definitely benefit from an i9. But even after the numerous patches and eventual fixes, I still wonder whether the stresses on these components will eventually shorten its life expectancy. I tend to keep my equipment for a long time. Reliability and build quality has always been their hallmark (my 10 year old mac pros and macbook pros are still humming even on Mojave betas) . However, now we are talking about equipment failures right out of the box (bad keyboards, hot logic boards, T2 failures etc.) Not what you would expect after shelling out $4000 - the true cost of the machine everyone really wants.

All of this is pushing me into Hackintosh territory and I really hate it.
 

Mr. Dee

macrumors 603
Original poster
Dec 4, 2003
5,990
12,840
Jamaica
It's clear that Cupertino only had one thing in mind when they released this: make sure we have an i9 ready for the Quarterly Earnings call - we need to beat Amazon to 1T valuation! There is absolutely no doubt in my mind. Definitely rushed out the door on a wing and prayer. I'm just sorry for the poor suckers in Engineering who probably fell on their swords for what was essentially a poor management priority. And they talk about Courage!?
That said, it is a testament to some previous brilliant minds (no longer there) that the beautiful and functional design lasted this long. It is now showing its age, and I believe this the last cycle where using the same enclosure and molds will be viable. Even though 10nm promises to be less power hungry, something else will always take up the headroom.
I myself am one of those in a pickle: I love macOS and I need a 32G laptop for my livelihood (i run multiple VMs - windoze and many linux variants) and bursty complex compilations would definitely benefit from an i9. But even after the numerous patches and eventual fixes, I still wonder whether the stresses on these components will eventually shorten its life expectancy. I tend to keep my equipment for a long time. Reliability and build quality has always been their hallmark (my 10 year old mac pros and macbook pros are still humming even on Mojave betas) . However, now we are talking about equipment failures right out of the box (bad keyboards, hot logic boards, T2 failures etc.) Not what you would expect after shelling out $4000 - the true cost of the machine everyone really wants.

All of this is pushing me into Hackintosh territory and I really hate it.

I would wait 6 months in. By then the early adopters will reveal their full findings whether this was update to take a chance on.

Ultimately, next years model would really be the one to wait for since it will iron some of issues with problems like the T2 chip and other components; and maybe Apple will make some well needed interim changes to the chassis.
 

pkouame

macrumors 65816
Jul 7, 2016
1,054
2,319
I would wait 6 months in. By then the early adopters will reveal their full findings whether this was update to take a chance on.

Ultimately, next years model would really be the one to wait for since it will iron some of issues with problems like the T2 chip and other components; and maybe Apple will make some well needed interim changes to the chassis.

If Intel is promising 10nm core i9 late 2019, I don't see how they could deliver anything of significance macbook pro related in 2019. And I'm not sure how reliable the Intel projections are any more. Apple developing its own chips is also fraught with potential risks. The down-side of Apple hitting the 1T valuation is it validates the strategy of building more disposal appliances and focusing on services. The whole macbook X, iMac X and Mac X line is suffering from neglect, and I don't see it getting any better. Dunno, maybe I need to drink more of the cool-aid ;)
 

KarmaRocket

macrumors 6502
Jan 4, 2009
292
244
Brooklyn, NY
I would wait 6 months in. By then the early adopters will reveal their full findings whether this was update to take a chance on.

Ultimately, next years model would really be the one to wait for since it will iron some of issues with problems like the T2 chip and other components; and maybe Apple will make some well needed interim changes to the chassis.

Or maybe you just keep waiting and waiting until Apple releases the perfect machine for you. Meanwhile, a lot of people are busy using their new machines and actually getting work done.

I just ordered an i9. I know it has issues and won't reach it's full potential. I'm fine with it. There are real world tests where users are seeing a significant gain over the i7. I'm hoping it meets all my needs. I can't wait anymore. I've been waiting since 2014 for a new machine. I'm tired of reading these forums everyday and hour looking for the perfect machine. It's never going to happen. Deal with the limitations and adapt. When Apple releases a significantly better machine, I'll think about selling my i9 and buying it. Until then, I'll enjoy my machine and get work done.
 

cool11

macrumors 68000
Sep 3, 2006
1,823
223
I think it is more realistic to say, that mbp 2020 will be brand new and simultaneously mature machine.
I think that the one that waits for 2019, if it is possible, it is better to wait for 2020.
Of course if someone needs a new machine right now, he can get it.
But I guess that 2020 mbp is what we really expect.
Opinions?
 
  • Like
Reactions: pkouame

New_Mac_Smell

macrumors 68000
Oct 17, 2016
1,931
1,552
Shanghai
I think it is more realistic to say, that mbp 2020 will be brand new and simultaneously mature machine.
I think that the one that waits for 2019, if it is possible, it is better to wait for 2020.
Of course if someone needs a new machine right now, he can get it.
But I guess that 2020 mbp is what we really expect.
Opinions?

The trend I see in the many threads like this (People holding out for XXXX), is that they want something on their device that they didn't realize existed previously. Like now, there's a lot of people demanding FaceID, and they will not buy if it doesn't have it... There's obvious reasons why the Mac doesn't have FaceID, but primarily, they didn't know it existed before the iPhone X - now it's another excuse to write a thread about why the new Mac doesn't meet their requirements, and to hold on till the next one.

By the time FaceID is on the Mac, there will be something else even better to use as a reason to not upgrade. Truth be told, I swear 90% of people looking to upgrade do not need to upgrade, they just want something new for Apple reasons, so it is crucial to have the latest and greatest - if you can't have this, then have a reason why you're waiting. That way you can still be 'the best'.
 

pkouame

macrumors 65816
Jul 7, 2016
1,054
2,319
Or maybe you just keep waiting and waiting until Apple releases the perfect machine for you. Meanwhile, a lot of people are busy using their new machines and actually getting work done.

I just ordered an i9. I know it has issues and won't reach it's full potential. I'm fine with it. There are real world tests where users are seeing a significant gain over the i7. I'm hoping it meets all my needs. I can't wait anymore. I've been waiting since 2014 for a new machine. I'm tired of reading these forums everyday and hour looking for the perfect machine. It's never going to happen. Deal with the limitations and adapt. When Apple releases a significantly better machine, I'll think about selling my i9 and buying it. Until then, I'll enjoy my machine and get work done.
No one is really wringing their hands here and I'm certainly glad you're enjoying your i9 - more power to you. The thing is, some us don't have thousands to blow on a mistake - just a fact of life. If all of this was pocket change, I would be the first one in line - like you. Take a risk, sell (and lose more money and time) if I'm not happy. No problem. I've even indulged like that many times (to Apple's benefit) So let us weigh the pros and cons out loud and air out the logic while we have fun shopping and dreaming...I also need to get "work" done.
[doublepost=1533537910][/doublepost]
I think it is more realistic to say, that mbp 2020 will be brand new and simultaneously mature machine.
I think that the one that waits for 2019, if it is possible, it is better to wait for 2020.
Of course if someone needs a new machine right now, he can get it.
But I guess that 2020 mbp is what we really expect.
Opinions?
Agreed. I have a relatively new 2017 and wish I had held out another year. I don't want to be in the same position next year if I sell (hassle) and jump on the 2018 band wagon. Apple and Wall Street love it when we play their game.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr. Dee

cool11

macrumors 68000
Sep 3, 2006
1,823
223
About the need of upgrading that New_Mac_Smell mentioned:
I prefer having the luxury of choosing the time of upgrading,
rather being forced to upgrade due to a serious/urgent reason.


Recently I lost my mobile phone.
I was forced to buy immediately a new one, simply because I did not had the time/luxury of waiting or getting exactly what I would.
Availability, delivery times etc.
If I had the time, I would have more money for my new phone, more time to search what suits my needs best, etc.
But I didn't.
So I was forced to just buy a new one, not bad, but not what I would really wanted.

So yes, discussing about my new mbp, it is not just for fun.
I enjoy the fact that I am not pressed to just buy one, anything on the market right now.
And besides people that complain all the time 'whatever it takes',
there are people that do have good reasons to expect not just something newer/better, but possibly something 'else', in other direction.

I am not sure that these topics 'waiting for the new model' were so frequent before 2010. And this can tell a lot about the choices the Apple makes.
Yes, they still build incredible machines, but as I have said in the past, I believe that somehow they lose their focus...
 

New_Mac_Smell

macrumors 68000
Oct 17, 2016
1,931
1,552
Shanghai
About the need of upgrading that New_Mac_Smell mentioned:
I prefer having the luxury of choosing the time of upgrading,
rather being forced to upgrade due to a serious/urgent reason.


Recently I lost my mobile phone.
I was forced to buy immediately a new one, simply because I did not had the time/luxury of waiting or getting exactly what I would.
Availability, delivery times etc.
If I had the time, I would have more money for my new phone, more time to search what suits my needs best, etc.
But I didn't.
So I was forced to just buy a new one, not bad, but not what I would really wanted.

So yes, discussing about my new mbp, it is not just for fun.
I enjoy the fact that I am not pressed to just buy one, anything on the market right now.
And besides people that complain all the time 'whatever it takes',
there are people that do have good reasons to expect not just something newer/better, but possibly something 'else', in other direction.

I am not sure that these topics 'waiting for the new model' were so frequent before 2010. And this can tell a lot about the choices the Apple makes.
Yes, they still build incredible machines, but as I have said in the past, I believe that somehow they lose their focus...

Honestly if I lost my phone now I'd just buy a local cheapo' Android special and wait for a newer model.

These kind of topics weren't popular before 2010, however I think you're looking at it from the wrong angle. Before 2010, Macs were very much a niche product. Now they sell a lot more than they did 10 years ago, so there's a lot more users. They're marketing is also done in a way to make you 'want' a Mac, and so you get a lot of people wanting to want one... There's also other parallels with the continued prevalence of the internet across everything in your life now, and much easier and faster access anywhere you go.

So I think the complaints, concerns, nonsense, has always been the same - when observed as a percentage, relevant to the users available.

TL;DR of course there are more complaints these days, there are a lot more users.
 

RobbieTT

macrumors 6502a
Apr 3, 2010
576
830
United Kingdom
The 13" Touch Bar models are not as prone to throttling.

To be clear, the 2018 13" TB Gen 8 i5 does not throttle at all at the claimed CPU level - not ever. Indeed, it has sufficient margin to operate well-above its specified base CPU frequency with all 4 cores running at 100%.

Apple routinely unlocks the Intel cpus so they are able to perform at levels beyond those indicated by the Intel specifications; so they are only limited by the silicone lottery and safe thermal limits.

Bouncing along at a thermal maximum whilst maintaining or exceeding the base frequency is not a performance throttle.

:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marketh

pkouame

macrumors 65816
Jul 7, 2016
1,054
2,319
About the need of upgrading that New_Mac_Smell mentioned:
I prefer having the luxury of choosing the time of upgrading,
rather being forced to upgrade due to a serious/urgent reason.


Recently I lost my mobile phone.
I was forced to buy immediately a new one, simply because I did not had the time/luxury of waiting or getting exactly what I would.
Availability, delivery times etc.
If I had the time, I would have more money for my new phone, more time to search what suits my needs best, etc.
But I didn't.
So I was forced to just buy a new one, not bad, but not what I would really wanted.

So yes, discussing about my new mbp, it is not just for fun.
I enjoy the fact that I am not pressed to just buy one, anything on the market right now.
And besides people that complain all the time 'whatever it takes',
there are people that do have good reasons to expect not just something newer/better, but possibly something 'else', in other direction.

I am not sure that these topics 'waiting for the new model' were so frequent before 2010. And this can tell a lot about the choices the Apple makes.
Yes, they still build incredible machines, but as I have said in the past, I believe that somehow they lose their focus...
Agreed. The level of complaints cannot be compared in absolute terms: more users = more complaints just doesn't fly. And the nature of the problems has changed. Apple's head of Software Engineering no less has admitted that they have serious quality issues - hence the focus on "fixing bugs" in Mojave. They said it, I didn't.
Those who don't think dysfunctional fragile keyboards, overheating logic boards, and Kernel Panics that warrant complete replacements within a few weeks of purchase (not to mention complete loss of data) , indicate serious quality control issues, just don't get it.

Is it seriously too much to ask a company raking in $15B of profit a quarter, hoarding $300B in cold hard cash and now valued at over 1T, to simply test the products they claim are the best in the world? I for one would like to expect more for my hard earned cash. Others will blindly just buy a shiny new thing Apple showcases every 6 months. To each his/her own.

TL;DR They can and should simply do better.
 

RobbieTT

macrumors 6502a
Apr 3, 2010
576
830
United Kingdom
Bouncing along at a thermal maximum whilst maintaining or exceeding the base frequency is not a performance throttle.

To back this up - a screenshot of my 2.3GHz i5 operating continuously at or above the 3.0GHz level. It is not often than you get more than what you bargained for:

image.png image.png Screen Shot 2018-07-25 at 20.14.33.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: Marketh

TechZeke

macrumors 68020
Jul 29, 2012
2,465
2,311
Dallas, TX
The trend I see in the many threads like this (People holding out for XXXX), is that they want something on their device that they didn't realize existed previously. Like now, there's a lot of people demanding FaceID, and they will not buy if it doesn't have it... There's obvious reasons why the Mac doesn't have FaceID, but primarily, they didn't know it existed before the iPhone X - now it's another excuse to write a thread about why the new Mac doesn't meet their requirements, and to hold on till the next one.

By the time FaceID is on the Mac, there will be something else even better to use as a reason to not upgrade. Truth be told, I swear 90% of people looking to upgrade do not need to upgrade, they just want something new for Apple reasons, so it is crucial to have the latest and greatest - if you can't have this, then have a reason why you're waiting. That way you can still be 'the best'.

Honestly, I'm beginning to care less and less each year about refresh cycles. I'll just buy what I want to buy when I want it. There's always something new around the corner.

For my uses, current devices are more than powerful enough these days. I really won't see any benefit having the latest and greatest processor from Intel.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macintoshmac

canteenboy

macrumors newbie
Apr 15, 2015
16
13
These guys and their keep waiting threads. Just bought the i9 32GB RAM 1TB and it's the nicest MacBook I've own. Way smoother than the 2015 13" and 15" that I've been using. SSD read and write speeds over 2700MB/s. I can run a bunch of my VMs at the same time with no hiccups. I didn't buy a laptop to constantly run Cinebench and look at numbers that don't mean anything.
 

Falhófnir

macrumors 603
Aug 19, 2017
6,146
7,001
I think it is more realistic to say, that mbp 2020 will be brand new and simultaneously mature machine.
I think that the one that waits for 2019, if it is possible, it is better to wait for 2020.
Of course if someone needs a new machine right now, he can get it.
But I guess that 2020 mbp is what we really expect.
Opinions?
Always avoid first gen machines, 2021 is the first (potential) ARM computer I’d personally consider (I’m quite happy to transition to ARM, there’s little compatibility to break for me and Apple will likely be able to deliver performance updates beyond what intel are currently offering). I’m not willing to wait that long to upgrade though so it’s the 2019 or a windows laptop next year (likely XPS 15, Spectre X360 or surface book 15 (though like the MacBook I’m not enamoured with what they’re asking for the surface book, and what they’re offering for that money so more likely one of the other two)).

Assuming Apple stick to 4 year design cycles I’m probably going for the last of each (2019, 2023...) from now on where I opt for the MacBook Pro. Assuming I go for a windows laptop, I’ll likely get a cheaper MacBook to keep a toe in the water though. My ideal solution would be Apple producing a 15” retina MacBook for around the same £1,599 they used to sell the pro for. I really don’t need a dGPU on a Mac, I’d be very happy with a 28W cpu and intel iris, 2016 speed SSDs and be able to get a 512GB SSD for more like £1,700 than the £2,700 a machine thus configured would cost at present.
 

glhiii

macrumors 6502
Nov 4, 2006
287
143
6 months ago I bought a 2015 13" MBP for half of what a new 2017 MBP would have cost. I think I'll wait until 2020 and then buy a 2018 machine, assuming the 2018 keyboards turn out to be OK and the Bridge OS error is fixed. I don't need very high performance -- the one thing that makes me want the 2018 is the True Tone display.
 
  • Like
Reactions: macintoshmac

macintoshmac

Suspended
May 13, 2010
6,089
6,994
6 months ago I bought a 2015 13" MBP for half of what a new 2017 MBP would have cost. I think I'll wait until 2020 and then buy a 2018 machine, assuming the 2018 keyboards turn out to be OK and the Bridge OS error is fixed. I don't need very high performance -- the one thing that makes me want the 2018 is the True Tone display.

- True Tone display
- better keyboard (quieter or not, the thing I am interested in is the supposedly better spring-back action)
- better sounding speakers
- two more cores across the spectrum

These are all the things that I desire to have, but do not need to have. 2016 MBP here.

If you bought a 2015 just 6 months ago, and from your reasoning you seem to know what you need, you are saving a lot of money while staying reasonably updated with the technology. Great going!
 

Mr. Dee

macrumors 603
Original poster
Dec 4, 2003
5,990
12,840
Jamaica
Always avoid first gen machines, 2021 is the first (potential) ARM computer I’d personally consider (I’m quite happy to transition to ARM, there’s little compatibility to break for me and Apple will likely be able to deliver performance updates beyond what intel are currently offering). I’m not willing to wait that long to upgrade though so it’s the 2019 or a windows laptop next year (likely XPS 15, Spectre X360 or surface book 15 (though like the MacBook I’m not enamoured with what they’re asking for the surface book, and what they’re offering for that money so more likely one of the other two)).

Assuming Apple stick to 4 year design cycles I’m probably going for the last of each (2019, 2023...) from now on where I opt for the MacBook Pro. Assuming I go for a windows laptop, I’ll likely get a cheaper MacBook to keep a toe in the water though. My ideal solution would be Apple producing a 15” retina MacBook for around the same £1,599 they used to sell the pro for. I really don’t need a dGPU on a Mac, I’d be very happy with a 28W cpu and intel iris, 2016 speed SSDs and be able to get a 512GB SSD for more like £1,700 than the £2,700 a machine thus configured would cost at present.

I guess Cool11 is forgetting all the issues with first revs:

2012 had issues with the lamination peeling - even with the 2015 I got burned by this. There was also some battery swelling issues if I remember correctly.

2016 had its own issues with graphical glitches, battery life and of course the keyboard.

2020 will be no different and the idea year to upgrade in that generation will likely be 2024.

I prefer to get in on the last generation of this batch where I know its well tested and proven design.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falhófnir
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.