Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

smoledman

macrumors 68000
Oct 17, 2011
1,943
364
Samsung Electronics would be probably be valued at $250 billion at least for anyone even thinking of buying. Good luck with that!
 

throAU

macrumors G3
Feb 13, 2012
9,152
7,307
Perth, Western Australia
Antitrust is a set of laws established a century ago to prevent accumulation of economic power in single entities or collectives. The Federal government in the US would not allow this, and the EU would throw its weight around too even though it lacks any semblance of jurisdiction, as it did with Honeywell/GE.

Not sure US law is entirely relevant in this case, as Samsung is not a US company. Ditto for EU law.
 

G51989

macrumors 68030
Feb 25, 2012
2,530
10
NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
Apple doesn't have that kind of money to buy a Company like Samsung. Samsung and all its assets would be valued at 200 Billion+. Apple simply doesn't have that kind of money laying around. Samsung makes WAY more than phones and computer monitors. Apple isn't up to the challenge of running Samsung either.

I mean.

grab_samsung.png


What does apple know about diggers :p
 
Last edited:

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,682
43,740
Not sure US law is entirely relevant in this case, as Samsung is not a US company. Ditto for EU law.

No but just as google had to get US, EU and China (and one else?) government approvals before completing the purchase of Motorola, I suspect apple would need US, EU, China and Korean approvals to close the deal and the likelihood of that is between slim and none (oh and slim left town :p)
 

iAppleseed

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 11, 2011
177
0
I thought Apple was the most valuable company on earth! It even says so on the front page of Mac Rumors.
 

AppleDApp

macrumors 68020
Jun 21, 2011
2,413
45
I thought Apple was the most valuable company on earth! It even says so on the front page of Mac Rumors.

Last I check Apple and Exxon were in the running for most valuable company. I don't know who is first as of now. Samsung Electronics Co. is currently valued at $150 billion. Apple currently holds about 103 billion in cash. For Apple to purchase Samsung which they won't do, they would have to pay all of there liquid assets + stock, or do it all in stock in which case Samsung would probably become the largest shareholder which would render the point of this moot.
 

\-V-/

Suspended
May 3, 2012
3,153
2,688
If Apple hates Samsung so much, then why don't they just simply buy them? They won't have to worry about patent infringement and competition. They can even have Samsung's patents and research so they can improve their products.

What could go wrong?

You're kidding, right? Right? Please?

Things are not that simple, sorry to say.
 

iAppleseed

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 11, 2011
177
0
Last I check Apple and Exxon were in the running for most valuable company. I don't know who is first as of now. Samsung Electronics Co. is currently valued at billion. Apple currently holds about 103 billion in cash. For Apple to purchase Samsung which they won't do, they would have to pay all of there liquid assets + stock, or do it all in stock in which case Samsung would probably become the largest shareholder which would render the point of this moot.

Confusing. If Samsung were that rich, why weren't they the ones running for most valuable company?

Anyways, Apple could just buy the Smartphone part of Samsung. That isn't too expensive anymore.
 

CalBoy

macrumors 604
May 21, 2007
7,849
37
Not sure US law is entirely relevant in this case, as Samsung is not a US company. Ditto for EU law.

It would because Samsung's US shell would be a part of the transaction. Jurisdiction would attach at that point.

Even if the US entities were kept separate somehow, both would most likely engage in import/export to the merged entity abroad, which is also covered by antitrust law.

Most valuable brand does not mean most valuable company.

In this case they are one in the same. Apple is the most valuable company in terms of market capitalization.

Confusing. If Samsung were that rich, why weren't they the ones running for most valuable company?

Do you know what a peer is?

Apple and Samsung are both titans; Apple just happens to be the biggest titan right now.
Anyways, Apple could just buy the Smartphone part of Samsung. That isn't too expensive anymore.

It's not for sale, so how could they buy it?

And even if it was, it wouldn't pass antitrust rules because it would concentrate the vast majority of sales and assets in the market into a single entity.
 

Tarzanman

macrumors 65816
Jul 16, 2010
1,304
15
As many people have pointed out:

1. Apple doesn't have nearly enough money to even consider buying Samsung

2. Even if Apple had the money to try to buy Samsung, Samsung wouldn't allow it

3. Samsung is *far* larger than Apple

4. etc etc

Samsung is to Korea what a General Electric is to the USA. They wield more power and influence than many governments.

Apple is a very rich company, but they aren't nearly as diversified as Samsung.

What happens when people get sick of iPhones and iPads? Disaster for Apple.

What happens when people get sick of Galaxy S phones and Galaxy Tab tablets? Samsung still sells electrical components, appliances, vehicles, microchips, etc etc etc
 

basesloaded190

macrumors 68030
Oct 16, 2007
2,693
5
Wisconsin
These threads need to stop. We shouldn't have to explain why it is a bad idea for apple to buy: Adobe, Microsoft, Samsung, Nintendo, Sony, etc.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.