Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

WillEH

macrumors 6502a
Feb 8, 2011
769
5
United Kingdom
You're forgetting, if Apple bought everyone out they'd start putting prices up on there already over priced products. I'm the fool who spent £2000 on OSX.
 

AppleDApp

macrumors 68020
Jun 21, 2011
2,413
45
Confusing. If Samsung were that rich, why weren't they the ones running for most valuable company?

Anyways, Apple could just buy the Smartphone part of Samsung. That isn't too expensive anymore.

Market capitalization and liquid assets are two very different things.

Say you have five dollars and an iPad, that would equate to about 505$ in assets to your name.

Say I have ten dollars and no iPad. In that case I would have more money then you but I can't buy you out because 1) you are not for sale. 2) I do not have the 505$ that you are worth.

Market capitalization (often simply market cap) is the total value of the tradable shares of a publicly traded company; it is equal to the share price times the number of shares outstanding. As outstanding stock is bought and sold in public markets, capitalization could be used as a proxy for the public opinion of a company's net worth and is a determining factor in some forms of stock valuation. Preferred shares are not included in the calculation.
 

AppleDApp

macrumors 68020
Jun 21, 2011
2,413
45
Why is this still being dragged on lol?

1: Samsung is not for sale.

2: Apple doesn't have the money.

3. Apple doesn't want to start selling heavy machinery and appliances.

Edit: Can we close this thread?
 

G51989

macrumors 68030
Feb 25, 2012
2,530
10
NYC NY/Pittsburgh PA
3. Apple doesn't want to start selling heavy machinery and appliances.

Edit: Can we close this thread?

Please close thread.

Apple has no urge to sell diggers, and fridges. And Cargo ships, and marine engines, and nuclear reactors.

1: its not profitable.
2: They dont know the first thing about it.
3: Close thread.
 

iAppleseed

macrumors regular
Original poster
May 11, 2011
177
0
I recommend that no one makes further comments on this thread so it may be buried into the depths of forgotten threads. That way, we can close this thread.
 

samxool

macrumors member
Sep 20, 2011
38
0
If Apple hates Samsung so much, then why don't they just simply buy them? They won't have to worry about patent infringement and competition. They can even have Samsung's patents and research so they can improve their products.

What could go wrong?

I think Samsung might be too big for Apple to buy.

Personally, I think Apple should just buy that english tv company ITV (the one where all the brits go "apple can't call their upcoming iTV an iTV as ITV won't allow it").

Just for that, Apple should buy ITV so it can call its tv iTV, and then once that is done, disband the entire ITV company and sack all its employees.
Consider that a warning shot Samsung!!

Apple has $100bn in the bank. Its time to start flexing those muscles Apple!!
 

roadbloc

macrumors G3
Aug 24, 2009
8,784
215
UK
Just for that, Apple should buy ITV so it can call its tv iTV, and then once that is done, disband the entire ITV company and sack all its employees.
Consider that a warning shot Samsung!!

facepalm.jpg


No... just no.
 

boss.king

macrumors 603
Apr 8, 2009
6,382
7,631
I think Samsung might be too big for Apple to buy.

Personally, I think Apple should just buy that english tv company ITV (the one where all the brits go "apple can't call their upcoming iTV an iTV as ITV won't allow it").

Just for that, Apple should buy ITV so it can call its tv iTV, and then once that is done, disband the entire ITV company and sack all its employees.
Consider that a warning shot Samsung!!

Apple has $100bn in the bank. Its time to start flexing those muscles Apple!!

You know how I know you aren't good at business....
 

samxool

macrumors member
Sep 20, 2011
38
0
Based on that post alone, it is clear to see you understand very little on how businesses work. You can't just a buy any business you choose, simply because they own a name you want.

the $100bn in apple's bank account kinda says otherwise!!:cool:
 

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,682
43,740
the $100bn in apple's bank account kinda says otherwise!!:cool:

Actually it takes more then money to buy a company, like regulatory approval. Stock holder approval etc. So in this case it doesn't matter how many billions apple has.
 

boss.king

macrumors 603
Apr 8, 2009
6,382
7,631
the $100bn in apple's bank account kinda says otherwise!!:cool:

Think of it like this: I can't come in and just buy your house and possessions, no matter how much money I have, it's your decision whether to sell it or not. Similarly, Apple can't just go around buying up any company they want (which is good, because that would be completely stupid and a waste of money anyway).
 

kako

macrumors member
Jun 26, 2004
35
0
Samsung are a huge part of South Korea; they even build heavy machinery, aeronautics equipment and defence gear for the South Korean Army. Approximately 1/5 of South Korea's exports are Samsung, and if Samsung were a country themselves they'd actually rank quite highly in terms of GDP.

That's not to say buying Samsung Mobile or their microchip business would be out of the question. But, it pretty much is. The mobile business is an enormous one, and Samsung dominates now as it has for years. If that ever changed, they would probably consider selling it off, but then there would be no motivation for Apple to buy it.

They'd be better off buying HTC or perhaps Asus, but then you get into the cultural problems of any merger, and it's a nightmare. Companies need to be culturally aligned for a merger to work, and these are businesses that have built themselves in opposition to Apple.

Actually, thinking of any company that would make a good cultural fit with Apple is difficult. That's why they stick with small teams.
 

ThisIsNotMe

Suspended
Aug 11, 2008
1,849
1,062
Indeed. Some people need to realize, 100 billion won't buy Samsung, Microsoft, Intel, Google, Cisco, and a couple other tech giants. Its a ton of money. But it can't buy everything.

$100 billion would most certainly buy Cisco.
Probably take $135 to get Intel.

Outside of patents, I am not sure why Apple would do that as they would give them little value at a huge cost.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.