Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Actually no. For me.. I transfer large movie files from my macbook pro (in iTunes) to my iPad. Wifi is by far slower than using USB 2 through itunes.
i agree on this. it's SO slow!!
But if you have an AC WIFI chip on your Mac, please try Airdrop instead of iTunes. That made a world of difference for me, it's really fast.
[doublepost=1497574314][/doublepost]
I have 1GB fiber internet speed.
it's doesn't matter. You don't even need internet. It's direct device to device Wifi transfer. =)
 
it depends. My mac has an AC wifi chip, so what I usually do is creating a big folder with the things I want to send to the iPad, zip it and send it via airdrop. It's a direct connection that does not pass throughout the router. And it's very fast for being wireless. Faster than USB2, in theory. I didn't do speed tests, but I'm pretty confident it's faster than syncing via itunes, cable or wireless.
Of course, if one of your devices is limited to WIFI N, then it's going to be much slower.
Thanks for the reply. I have the 13" MBP TB. If I were to get one of the newer iPads, I should have AC connection between the devices, correct?
 
Thanks for the reply. I have the 13" MBP TB. If I were to get one of the newer iPads, I should have AC connection between the devices, correct?
Yes, correct. Actually, WIFi AC has been supported since the iPad Air 2 (although it's faster on recent iPads, because reading and writing speeds of the flash memory were bottle necks and now they have been improved)
 
Useless comment. We are talking about through the router in your house.
Smh.

I'm using an apple AC router and still get slow transfers from wifi
I don't know about iTunes, but Airdrop doesn't pass through the router, so, if you use Airdrop, your router should be irrelevant. You don't even need a router, you can be in the middle of the ocean/desert, with no connection at all and Airdrop will still work (personal experience). I suspect the iTunes implementation is just inferior and older
 
  • Like
Reactions: Craiguyver
I don't know about iTunes, but Airdrop doesn't pass through the router, so, if you use Airdrop, your router should be irrelevant. You don't even need a router, you can be in the middle of the ocean/desert, with no connection at all and Airdrop will still work (personal experience). I suspect the iTunes implementation is just inferior and older

Really? Cool.

What did you transfer from to the iPad with Airdrop please ?
 
Really? Cool.

What did you transfer from to the iPad with Airdrop please ?
It works between recent iOS devices, between recent Mac computers, and between recent Mac computers AND iOS devices.
Alas, no Windows/Android support, which is Airdrop biggest limitation
 
It works between recent iOS devices, between recent Mac computers, and between recent Mac computers AND iOS devices.
Alas, no Windows/Android support, which is Airdrop biggest limitation

Cool so I could transfer video files from my iPhone to my iPad or back again ?
 
Useless comment. We are talking about through the router in your house.
Smh.

I'm using an apple AC router and still get slow transfers from wifi
Unfortunately even your comment is kinda offtopic because this topic is about getting USB 3 sync speeds on the new iPads. I have tried wifi transferring but inspite of connecting at 866 Mbps to the router and my PC connecting at 1 Gbps via ethernet cable, I was never able to surpass USB 2 transfer speeds. That's the nature of wifi tech. Speeds are usually halved due to random things like interference, channel issues, etc.
 
The link you provided only has usb 2 lightning accessories. No USB-C or USB3. And the reason for that is that Apple forbids this. As for the "why"...I don't have an answer. They might want to be the only one selling fast charging lightning cables, or lightning to usb 3 accessories, for profit reasons. Or because they don't really trust their own implementation.

Yeah, I knew they were only USB 2. And maybe you're right, they don't have enough confidence in their implementation to put supporting products (cables) out themselves or to let others do it.
 
Yeah, I knew they were only USB 2. And maybe you're right, they don't have enough confidence in their implementation to put supporting products (cables) out themselves or to let others do it.

yep...look what I have found, first paragraph, the asterisks
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204566

From Apple's own MFI website:
"*Only Apple makes the USB-C to Lightning Cable. There are no "Made for iPod/iPhone/iPad" USB-C to Lightning cables."


Also...
There you go guys! I 've just perform a quick Airdrop test, so that we can add some numbers to our discussion:

With no internet connection, I've sent three large files (2200 MB each) from my 2014 MacBook Air to my 2015 iPad Pro, via Airdrop.
On average, the transfer speed was 56.4 MB/s, which is equal to 451.2 Mbit/s
The theorethical speed of USB2 is 60MB/s (or 480 Mbit/s).

But that's theory! In practice USB2 is usually around 30-40 MB/s (at best), which means that Airdrop can actually be faster than USB2.

Conversely, USB3 is much faster, having a theoretical limit of 640MB/s.

Conclusions: Airdrop between recent Ac devices is as fast as cable transfer, if not noticeably faster, and it's suitable for moderate to average workflows, while still falling short of modern tethered connections (USB3/USBC), that after 5 years Apple is still unwilling to provide to its "Pro" users.

Good news and Bad news in the same post. =)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: d5aqoëp
yep...look what I have found, first paragraph, the asterisks
https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT204566

From Apple's own MFI website:
"*Only Apple makes the USB-C to Lightning Cable. There are no "Made for iPod/iPhone/iPad" USB-C to Lightning cables."


Also...
There you go guys! I 've just perform a quick Airdrop test, so that we can add some numbers to our discussion:

With no internet connection, I've sent three large files (2200 MB each) from my 2014 MacBook Air to my 2015 iPad Pro, via Airdrop.
On average, the transfer speed was 56.4 MB/s, which is equal to 451.2 Mbit/s
The theorethical speed of USB2 is 60MB/s (or 480 Mbit/s).

But that's theory! In practice USB2 is usually around 30-40 MB/s (at best).

Conversely, USB3 is much faster, having a theoretical limit of 640MB/s.

Conclusions: Airdrop between recent Ac devices is as fast as cable transfer, if not noticeably faster, and it's suitable for moderate to average workflows, while still falling short of modern tethered connection, that after 5 years Apple is still unwilling to provide to its "Pro" users.

Good news and Bad news in the same post. =)

And you still have the problem that Airdrop is Apple - Apple only.
 
Unfortunately even your comment is kinda offtopic because this topic is about getting USB 3 sync speeds on the new iPads. I have tried wifi transferring but inspite of connecting at 866 Mbps to the router and my PC connecting at 1 Gbps via ethernet cable, I was never able to surpass USB 2 transfer speeds. That's the nature of wifi tech. Speeds are usually halved due to random things like interference, channel issues, etc.

I only mentioned the AC router to clarify that wifi syncing is no faster. Someone earlier had asked.

To be honest everyone is all over the place in this thread and I can't really take it any more. Good luck guys
 
Isnt there a way to connect to ethernet now? Will that work at higher speeds? I think the apple accessory only supports usb2 but not sure if there is a work around With a different manufacturer's accessory.

Also, has someone actually contacted Apple to see if there is a way to sync with usb3 speeds? Or do they just limit it to the camera adapter and sd card reader? What about just putting your files on a sd card to go on the iPad pro?

There is indeed a way to use Ethernet adapters with the camera adapters with the iPad. YMMV though
 
There is indeed a way to use Ethernet adapters with the camera adapters with the iPad. YMMV though

There is, unfortunately you have to use the Apple Ethernet adaptor. Which of course is...USB 2.0. Apple probably won't ever make a USB 3.0 adaptor as they have thunderbolt, and third party adaptors won't work on iOS as they don't have the drivers (unlike this Apple adaptor that seems to have the drivers built into iOS).

If there's a USB 3 to thunderbolt adaptor someone could go crazy with 3 dongles to try and get USB 3 Ethernet....
 
Well, based on your screenshot it looks like a power issue. USB 3 data transfer requires 900 mA (milliamps) at 5 V (Volts) according to this page on Apple:
https://support.apple.com/en-gb/HT204377

The power argument seems reasonable. That's still no excuse for anything

Well, the screentshot clearly stated 500 mA.

I don't have a strong opinion on the USB2/3 matter, but I just thought I'd come back and correct these mistaken messages. To be fair, System Information's USB power is difficult to read.

The total amount of power being given to a device is the sum of "current available" and "extra operating current". In my original screenshot, it's showing that my iPad is being given 500mA + 1600mA = 2100mA.

I believe it's written like this because USB power handshaking happens in stages - first, the device connects using the base USB power spec which tops out at 500mA, then negotiates with the host to enable the higher levels of power delivery that more modern devices support. Here, System Information is telling us that the iPad requested the maximum available 500mA as part of the base USB power spec, then requested an extra 1600mA as part of the high power spec.

Indeed, if you plug any modern iPad into a port that only supplies 500mA it'll give a "Not Charging" message, which isn't the case when I plug my iPad into my MacBook. It charges pretty quickly!
 
  • Like
Reactions: rui no onna
The total amount of power being given to a device is the sum of "current available" and "extra operating current". In my original screenshot, it's showing that my iPad is being given 500mA + 1600mA = 2100mA.

I did notice the extra available power. But in your screenshot I saw both the required (=requested) and available (=provided) current to be at 500mA.

I think the extra operating current is used for fast change. At least it is how I read this page:

https://support.apple.com/en-gb/HT204377
 
They're prolly gonna wait for the iPhone before they do some kind of update to allow usb3 speeds. It's able to in all likelihood but they'll wait til the iPhone so they can sell special lightning cables and make more money.
 
There is, unfortunately you have to use the Apple Ethernet adaptor. Which of course is...USB 2.0. Apple probably won't ever make a USB 3.0 adaptor as they have thunderbolt, and third party adaptors won't work on iOS as they don't have the drivers (unlike this Apple adaptor that seems to have the drivers built into iOS).

If there's a USB 3 to thunderbolt adaptor someone could go crazy with 3 dongles to try and get USB 3 Ethernet....

I heard someone using a third party Ethernet adapter successfully but I am not sure, let me check
 
  • Like
Reactions: aypues
I did notice the extra available power. But in your screenshot I saw both the required (=requested) and available (=provided) current to be at 500mA.

I think the extra operating current is used for fast change. At least it is how I read this page:

https://support.apple.com/en-gb/HT204377

The page you linked exactly matches what I said:

In the example above, the USB port offers the default 500 mA, as shown in the Current Available (mA) entry. The Current Required (mA) entry indicates the current the device needs to operate. Extra Operating Current (mA) indicates that this USB port is providing an additional 1600 mA for use with the device.

My screenshot shows that the iPad is receiving a total of 2100mA — the 500mA default plus 1600mA extra operating current.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.