I am perfectly happy with 4.4 and don't like a lot of the changes in L. But we will see. My phone needs are relatively basic. As long as GPS, texting, calling etc. all work without being a pain in the ass I can live with it.
So for battery drain issues, I have read it often in these very forums and as recent as last week. Here is a link to another site that claims it as well:
Linky
Regarding actual issues with the Skype app, just look above to poster I was responding too. Clearly he is having some issues with Skype on his phone.
Microsoft makes Skype. Microsoft is a competitor to Apple. Skype is also known as a serious battery draining app. It's crappy code and it's a third party app from a competitor that makes the iPhone experience crappy. People like you who can't see the forrest through the trees blame Apple which is exactly what Microsoft would want. Have you started shopping for a Windows phone yet?
That link actually disproves your statement. You stated ......
Sure any app that stays running drains some battery, but that link just shows that Sykpe is actually one that has little effect on battery life. The Hog Detail in that screenshot speaks for itself. Serious battery draining? I think not.
Now what source do you have to claim what's in bold in your statement?
Did you read the article at all?
I sure did. Show me where your point is proven.
Not saying that. I think that the approach Apple took by locking widgets to the pull down notification slide is an intelligent one. We are allowed to have different preferences right?
In Apple's case, I don't believe they see it that way. As long as the widgets are limited to what Apple allows within the UI, they can control how it effects CPU processes and RAM. (They don't have to worry about 3rd party code inadvertantly screwing anything up. By that I mean either allowing 3rd party widgets onto the homescreen or having 3rd party apps effecting Apple's homegrown widgets, assuming those widgets were allowed onto the homescreen, that is. All widgets are housed within the notification center and therefore segregated.)
They want to ensure the UI 'looks' smooth and that the battery life is not effected. Consumer use and desires are secondary.
The fact that the title says apps that drain your battery should be an indicator. A quick Google search for "Skype draining iPhone Battery" brings up tons of hits. Here is a link to the Skype forum with folks complaining:
Linky
Microsoft makes Skype. Microsoft is a competitor to Apple. Skype is also known as a serious battery draining app. It's crappy code and it's a third party app from a competitor that makes the iPhone experience crappy. People like you who can't see the forrest through the trees blame Apple which is exactly what Microsoft would want. Have you started shopping for a Windows phone yet?
People in this thread severely overestimate the amount of people that actually USE home screen widgets.
Not saying that. I think that the approach Apple took by locking widgets to the pull down notification slide is an intelligent one. We are allowed to have different preferences right?
Nope. I've been coming back over and over again and while it's improved, it's still largely inferior.
Microsoft makes Skype. Microsoft is a competitor to Apple. Skype is also known as a serious battery draining app. It's crappy code and it's a third party app from a competitor that makes the iPhone experience crappy. People like you who can't see the forrest through the trees blame Apple which is exactly what Microsoft would want. Have you started shopping for a Windows phone yet?
I can literally get a new nexus device and have it unlocked and rooted in under 30 seconds. That includes getting the phone out of the box.
My guess is you have never used fastboot commands in the CMD prompt before, have you?I would really love to see this...
I would really love to see this...
fastboot oem unlock
fastboot flash recovery recovery.img
adb sideload SuperSU.zip
Your guess would be incorrect.My guess is you have never used fastboot commands in the CMD prompt before, have you?
30 seconds may be an exaggeration, but it shouldn't take longer than 5 minutes if you've already got the SDK tools set up. Maybe add another 5-10 min if you don't.
I'm just saying the word literally may be a bit over-used.
I 'literally'Your guess would be incorrect.
Yeah, but he said literally. I'm not saying you can't do it quickly, I'm just saying the word literally may be a bit over-used.
Boot into recovery and choose to install zip via ADB (CWM and TWRP both have this) to flash root.
Code:adb install SuperSU.zip
Done.
What's a more accurate number of home screen widget users?
----------
Given this exact reasoning, wouldn't you agree then that it'd be better if there was an option to put widgets wherever one would want?
----------
No. I look at widgets and try to determine a reason for them being. The reason I believe is to provide you quick access to information or settings without launching an app. If this reasoning is correct, then from an organization and user experience standpoint, widgets should be confined to notifications pull down and control center pull up. Makes sense and is intuitive without everything being all over the place.
Let's look at the user experience flow on the iPhone to get to one. This is assuming everyone uses a pin code or some form of security across all phone platforms. On the iPhone, if I want access to weather or ESPN scores, no unlock needed. I swipe down and there is my information. Need to toggle a setting? Swipe up without unlocking the phone and boom! On Android phones, you have to unlock your phone before you can get settings? I have a Galaxy S3 but I'm to lazy to go check. Same could be said for the widgets on the home screen. So if the point of widgets is quick access to info and settings, iOS allows you to get to that quicker.
With that said, I think Android L is hot and that would be the OS I would want on any potential Android phone I would buy. Ultimately, I think iOS is a more polished and thought out product which in my opinion makes it the preferred choice hands down.
No. I look at widgets and try to determine a reason for them being. The reason I believe is to provide you quick access to information or settings without launching an app. If this reasoning is correct, then from an organization and user experience standpoint, widgets should be confined to notifications pull down and control center pull up. Makes sense and is intuitive without everything being all over the place.
Let's look at the user experience flow on the iPhone to get to one. This is assuming everyone uses a pin code or some form of security across all phone platforms. On the iPhone, if I want access to weather or ESPN scores, no unlock needed. I swipe down and there is my information. Need to toggle a setting? Swipe up without unlocking the phone and boom! On Android phones, you have to unlock your phone before you can get settings? I have a Galaxy S3 but I'm to lazy to go check. Same could be said for the widgets on the home screen. So if the point of widgets is quick access to info and settings, iOS allows you to get to that quicker.
With that said, I think Android L is hot and that would be the OS I would want on any potential Android phone I would buy. Ultimately, I think iOS is a more polished and thought out product which in my opinion makes it the preferred choice hands down.