Nope, just you. Point being that people who don't understand the tech they are posting about shouldn't post about it.
If you don't understand how 4,1 to 5,1 hack works, you don't.
All of the machine firmware hacks just used an existing firmware, completely 100% unmolested by anyone.
To add GPUs to 6,1 firmware would be a HUGE undertaking. Again, research is what you need to do to understand.
Just as a reminder, this is exactly what MVC's replying to in my post discussing
environmental/energy impact:
And any nMP will still be useful long after it's no longer good enough for serious video editing - being such a small quiet machine, I'm sure people will be finding all sorts of uses for them even a decade from now. Most Macs less than 10 years old EOL when it's broken, not because it doesn't have the latest GPU.
So again MVC, WTF does your reply have to do with anything I wrote? Be
specific about how any of the statements in my post are related to what you're ranting on about.
This is MVC's typical modus operandi to try and discredit people...
1. He'll reply by first insulting you with a "
you don't know/understand anything" statement - this is almost guaranteed to elicit an angry and defensive reply from the poster - anytime someone is called out in that way in a public forum, they naturally feel the need to defend themselves.
2. He purposely misconstrues what was written to suggest something completely different or unrelated - this is intended to push you off balance - you either don't know how to respond because it's like conversing with a crazy person, or you get sucked into his straw-man arguments.
3. MVC will then continues to rant for a few posts without actually addressing the original points he was replying to - this is meant to distract readers from his hat trick... you can't argue with the random and unrelated factual information he drops in, which is intertwined with further accusations that you don't know what they're talking about. There's no way to reply to that.
The problem is, while all those technical details about hacks and firmware may be largely correct, they don't have
anything to do with what I wrote. I guess he just wanted to insult and discredit me, but couldn't find a relevant opening, so he just picked a random quote of mine and started spouting off.