🤣
4:53pm - NO INTEL IMAC REDESIGN
5:05pm - NO INTEL IMAC REDESIGN
6:04pm - INTEL IMAC WILL GET REDESIGN
🤣
Let's just go ahead and call it now, let down and move on. (reverse psychology)In about 24 hours we either know or are let down again.
Let's just go ahead and call it now, let down and move on. (reverse psychology)
Apple moving the iMac to the iMac Pro chassis and cooling is almost certainly going to result in a not-insignificant price increase, you all realize. Probably minimum $500 when you factor in the price of the cooling system plus the new systemboard they will need to design to work around it. You will almost certainly also lose user-upgradeable RAM and of course SSD-only storage options.
So you all ready for the entry level iMac to run $2999 with 10th Gen i5, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD and Radeon Pro 5300?
And probably at or abover $4999 for a 10th Gen i9, 64GB RAM, 2TB SSD and Radeon Pro 5600/5700?
So it will be like buying a new car at full retail price a couple months before a completely redesigned better model comes out, and then having super buyers remorse, and to top it off, good luck on that resale/trade value.Apple moving the iMac to the iMac Pro chassis and cooling is almost certainly going to result in a not-insignificant price increase, you all realize. Probably minimum $500 when you factor in the price of the cooling system plus the new systemboard they will need to design to work around it. You will almost certainly also lose user-upgradeable RAM and of course SSD-only storage options.
So you all ready for the entry level iMac to run $2999 with 10th Gen i5, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD and Radeon Pro 5300?
And probably at or abover $4999 for a 10th Gen i9, 64GB RAM, 2TB SSD and Radeon Pro 5600/5700?
yes of cause, they will completely disrupt their pricing And leave a Gigant gab starting at 2000€... think Bro.
you might be a little light on the build to order models. Apple's pricing is usally good for the base model and then quickly goes wild as you start adding things. I don't see this any different.That can be covered with the 24" Apple Silicon model with pricing as such:
And for the record, I do not believe Apple will move the Intel iMac 5K to the iMac Pro chassis. I'm not sure they will drop Fusion, for that matter.
- $1499 for 8GB and 256GB storage
- $1999 for 16GB and 512GB storage
- $2499 for 32GB and 1TB storage
Something seems fishy to me about this whole thing. Right from the start of the WWDC rumor and pull back. Something is off here. Well, maybe Apple is off... Love my Apple stuff, but it wouldn't be the first time they f'ed up.
you might be a little light on the build to order models. Apple's pricing is usally good for the base model and then quickly goes wild as you start adding things. I don't see this any different.
It's quite weird that now people are listening to leakers that have like 1000 followers and not really good track record. If someone says "New intel iMac *could* be released this week" it's not a leaker, it's just a guesser.
I understand that people are frustrated about the iMac, which became just another product that is forgotten by Apple for many years, because it is not making that main profit.
If Apple was Porsche, they would still produce a 996/997, because Cayenne is making several times more money. But it doesn't work like that if the company is really smart. Every product that makes the product-line complete is important and the heritage and enthusiastic customer base is as important as profits.
The funny thing is that people don't expect miracles, they just want to have an up-to-date computer every year and a redesign (evolution) every few years. Computers are not cars, they doesn't need years to be developed, yet Apple is pretending they need such a long time to produce something.
I feel like this is going to be a HUGE iMac update.
Reasons:
- It's been too long without a major redesign. From the front, the current iMac looks exactly the same as my 2010 one. TEN YEARS of a computer looking the same!!
- After 20 years, the OS is going from X (10) to 11. That feels like it warrants recognition in the machines' redesigns across the board.
- With Apple silicon and Big Sur allowing native iOS and iPadOS apps, *most* of the applications on Macs will be touch first applications.
- Tied into the previous point, Big Sur looks like it's meant for touch.
- Apple won't likely want to put touch screens on Macs without a good story about why it's no longer an ergonomics issue as they'd argued previously. That means they'll likely do something like the Surface Studio form factor.
- This is less likely to factor in as the COVID pandemic is relatively new, but I believe desktop computers will have a resurgence as fewer people are carrying their computers back and forth to workplaces and desktops offer more bang for the buck.
I will say this over and over again. That Apple leaks (rumors) account is the dirt worst. I never saw that guy call anything concret or let alone first.not sure why these random twitter accounts are getting attention either
btw this guy said imac at wwdc before, back in June... so...
1. that’s what people would have told you the last couple of revisions. And it’s a less than 8 year old design, not a ten year old design.
2. this is Not a Big Sur machine IF it was supposed to be out for a long time already. If this is a Big Sur machine it will not arrive tomorrow.
3. we are Talking Intel Right now. Arm Imac next year, if your lucky later this year. No rumors suggesting touch displays at all.
4. this is Not going to be a touchscreen os in 2021. Mind you People already have the code. We would know.
5. Absolutely. But not tomorrow, not this year. Probably not even 2021 (iMac) since that’s when the first arm iMac is supposed to hit.
The pushback on timing is fair enough. I'm in the market for a new iMac but won't buy one unless it's a radical redesign. Not when Apple has indicated that touch screens are coming through iOS compatability and what I'm seeing in Big Sur's visual hints. I stand by my comment about this being a very old design. Here's the 2009 version and I would challenge anyone to tell the difference between this one and the current one without seeing it from the side. So 11 years with (more or less) the same design.
View attachment 937779
Good points all around, and I wonder what internal updates we might get. WiFi 6? Brighter screen? Does the 2019 have true tone? T2 Chip?I got a secret for you here. If you are actually using the computer you are looking into the screen, not around it. So if you want to shun people from looking at it from the side, be shuned into looking into the actual display to do computer things with your computer.
Apple never officially said Touch is coming to MacOS. It will probably happen, but honestly for a first step i see MacOS coming to touch (i.e. being a option on a iPad Pro - but again, not now, because it just is not in the code)
This is going to be the last hurrah for the normal iMac in its current design form, so I highly doubt it. They will instead use custom (down clocked) Intel CPUs to meet the current, awful, thermal design.
We know Apple’s playbook by now. You know they’ll throw in some feature compelling enough to entice those who can’t wait any longer to buy an iMac.
It really could be as simple as offering it in Space Grey. Or maybe they drop in FaceID. Regardless, I suspect it’ll be tricked out to the max (as max as Intel can offer). They’ll have to sell this with a straight face knowing they’re still peddling a decade old design.
They have no ideaKomiya claiming iMac to be updated on website around 19 August.
After claiming this days ago-