Yes, I am waiting for the 27”/30” one so I am afraid the wait will be quite long (next Fall?)
To run available now intel apps and VMs?...In my opinion unless absolutely necessary it is wise to wait a few months and get a M1 iMac. We are in the middle of a big transition and it is more then obvious that the future is ARM. So why to buy an old generation iMac in terms of design and chip?
To run available now intel apps and VMs?...
Guys, no imac will come with M1
M1 is limited with ports and bandwith
So be ready for something else like M1X or M2 etc
For me the 2020 iMac is perfect. I can do my work and play the latest AAA games on it. An Apple silicon iMac won't be able to do that anytime soon, if ever.
I hope in 5 years or so Mac gaming has become more serious or I'll have to buy 2 new computers by then
I agree and I was ready to wait til this autumn for a 24 inch iMac but when rumour said next spring (perhaps) my MBP from 2014 screaming through every Zoom meeting was not an option in COVID-19 times. If I did not do so much work from home I could have waited until spring.
I disagree that the iMac 2020 is DOA as it will work perfectly for a very long time. With that reasoning every computer is DOA as there is always something new next year. MacOS will likely be updated for at least 5 years and likely up to 8 years.
Besides, the current iMac is design classic and who says a new design is looking nice? Personally, I do not like the XDR display and that hard industrial design clashes strongly with my library nordic furniture style than the softer design of the current iMac.
Yeah, DOA is a bit drastic, I agree, but I like to exaggerate.
If I had to buy a computer now to shift me over till the iMac update I would probably get the new Mac Mini. Super cheap and super fast for the price tag. ;-)
I keep going back and forth on whether to get the mini or wait for the new iMac. Since I will be working from home through at least the end of the 1st quarter, having a 10+ year old computer gives me a little bit of a concern. It is running great with no issues but you just never know.
Not regretting my 2020 iMac purchase at all right now. It wouldn’t surprise me if we didnt see the larger frame apple silicon iMac until 2022 at this point. That’d be about a year and a half between updates and iMac’s have gone longer than that before. Regardless, the machine i have is a beast for my workflow, and more importantly it’s the machine i needed now. I’ll love the next one regardless I’m sure, but for now, this iMac is making me money in a very stalled industry and thats not nothing. View attachment 1678316
It's the 60 by 30 Vari Desk and a Grovemade stand. I figured if I was gonna be stuck in the house for over a year it might as well be nice.Really nice set up?, this is why I need a bigger desk. Work set up ( Dell laptop & monitor ) on the left , then my personal corner on the centre/right with the Mx redesigned iMac 27” or 30”.
It's the 60 by 30 Vari Desk and a Grovemade stand. I figured if I was gonna be stuck in the house for over a year it might as well be nice.
Haha, after 383 pages in this thread, I know . Honestly, a DOA discussion about Intel Mac is much needed. I had that ambivalent feeling if this was the right thing to do. Especially because I keep my devices until they feel too slow so I will be looking and using that iMac for a decade.Yeah, DOA is a bit drastic, I agree, but I like to exaggerate.
If I had to buy a computer now to shift me over till the iMac update I would probably get the new Mac Mini. Super cheap and super fast for the price tag. ;-)
Haha, after 383 pages in this thread, I know . Honestly, a DOA discussion about Intel Mac is much needed. I had that ambivalent feeling if this was the right thing to do. Especially because I keep my devices until they feel too slow so I will be looking and using that iMac for a decade.
My MP at work is from 2014 and I have no intention to switch that either. I hope I can keep it for additional 7-8 years or until Apple pulls intel MacOS support. The low res thunderbolt display is however not a nice experience after the new iMac at home. First world problem.
If they do, I keep wondering about how that will compare to the 2020 i9 iMac with the 5700 XT. Of course, it's wild guessing for now. But I have the feeling that, also in general when making an new chip, it's easier to blow away an 8th gen i3 than it will be to blow away a 10th gen i9 with high end graphics card. Sure, Apple will make sure it beats it, but I don't think by margins we have seen so far in the lower regions. What do you guys think?
The M1 appears to be able to run with a mid-2019 15.4" MacBook Pro with the 9th generation i9 and AMD Radeon RX 560, so I think an "M14X" and the Apple GPU will probably run with the 2019 iMac.
The 2020 MPB and iMac do have better AMD GPUs, so we'll need to see there, but I think the "M1X" will hold it's own against a 10th Gen i9, at least. And I think we will be pleasantly surprised how good Apple's Lifuka GPU will do against the 2020 AMD dGPUs in Mac desktops and portables.
M1 is lowend chip and its performance is mind-blowing. Imagine what the next M1X or so will do when its for mid range products like iMac etc. If Apple gives us so much performance on low end, the mid range will be insane.
Well like I said: it could all well be true, but this logic strikes me as a bit too simple and hypey. It will be better than the M1 and it will be better than the current midrange Macs, but the question is how much better. Even if the M1X/M2 is 2,5 times as fast as the M1, what would be impressive (maybe a lot of focus will also be on price, thermals, power use?), that will be more or less on the same level as an 10th gen i9 (based on the latest Cinebench R23). And that's not counting in any software/rosetta-penalties, and we don't know how well AS GPU's will perform at all. So the assertion that the 2020 i9 iMac isn't a good buy or will become unsellable in 1-2 years can't be based on what we know now, if you ask me. It will be a great Mac, able to handle all sorts of heavy tasks for at least 7-8 years to come.
I will probably sell it as soon as there will be an AS iMac that blows away the i9 like the M1 did to the i3/i5. They eventually will get there and honestly I can't wait but don't get carried away just yet... In the meantime I'm going to caress my i9 and tell people with an M1-Mac my Intel-Mac is faster as much as I can. ?
We shall see. From the benchmarks I've seen from Max its on par with a lot of high end models so not sure why you are comparing it to i3 or i5.
Regardless, you want to get 2020 iMac, I won't stop you. I just don't think its a smart purchase at this stage. Thats all
I meant it's easier to impress when comparing to lower end compressors, but you're right that it seems to be on the same level or sometimes even beat high end (9th gen i9) mobile chips, which is pretty insane.
But still, when comparing to desktop chips in terms of raw processing power: the latest Cinebench R23 is a really good benchmark for that, and the M1 scores about the same as a 10th gen i5 (around 7.700, you can check here). And in some way the M1 seems to score especially well in terms of video editing (probably because of software optimization and machine learning, but I don't really know anything about that), and that's exactly where the Max Tech tests focus on a lot. But when you look at music production, in a realistic setting, the 2020 i9 iMac can handle 3-4 times as much plugins (and basically that's always your bottleneck when producing or mixing). Check out this test for instance, comparing the M1.
So for music producers (unless you only use Logic with just the stock plugins, what very few (semi-)professionals will do), the Apple Sillicon doesn't seem to be the valhalla that it is for video editors. Yet.
But I certainly have to admit to you that I find it kind of frustrating that, just when I finally made up my mind on the 2020 i9 iMac, Apple decides to push the biggest and promising transition in processorland of the past decade. And I will have to wait if I want a piece of that pie anytime soon.
I am also super excited about the M1 and later iterations. Apple started with a bang and it is easy to see high end "M" chips for desktops (or "D", but lets not take that debate) that gives Xeon/Threadripper and high end GPUs a stiff competition (the latter maybe a dedicated card). That does not lessen the capabilities of the current iMac. For my work flow, the Intel iMac is sufficient. An M1(X) 24 inch iMac would be fine as well. A 3X performance super "M" desktop will not change that. The reason is that I found out the 3D models/rendering for teaching is often too difficult to comprehend so I am back to the 2D simplified world of Keynote and instead using two projection (side and top view) which is easier to grasp.
Still on iPhone 6 here. All the work from home has lessened my need for a phone so next year perhaps.