Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
7,820
6,725
Microsoft and Windows needs to fix the spammy nature of everything from applications, to the notification system which prevents me from doing certain actions since its at the bottom right of the screen.

Seriously every Edge or Teams or Office update has some sort of "tutorial" that shows up in 5-10 seconds that prevents me from working and gives me "Show me" or "Dismiss" prompts. OneDrive spammy prompts etc.

This is one of the reasons I much prefer macOS. It is much less hands on and gets out of my way and lets me just get to my work.
 

diamond.g

macrumors G4
Mar 20, 2007
11,156
2,466
OBX
Microsoft and Windows needs to fix the spammy nature of everything from applications, to the notification system which prevents me from doing certain actions since its at the bottom right of the screen.

Seriously every Edge or Teams or Office update has some sort of "tutorial" that shows up in 5-10 seconds that prevents me from working and gives me "Show me" or "Dismiss" prompts. OneDrive spammy prompts etc.

This is one of the reasons I much prefer macOS. It is much less hands on and gets out of my way and lets me just get to my work.
I agree, but I also think the lack of a new features popup for macOS leave a lot of new stuff undiscovered to some users. So I get why Microsoft does it, sometimes. I really hate the Edge we've just updated window, it is really annoying.
 

polyphenol

macrumors 68000
Sep 9, 2020
1,906
2,279
Wales
I agree, but I also think the lack of a new features popup for macOS leave a lot of new stuff undiscovered to some users. So I get why Microsoft does it, sometimes. I really hate the Edge we've just updated window, it is really annoying.
There is an argument that if you are happily using a system, just carry on. Ignore most new features.

The number of times I have seen something new, tried it, and dropped it almost immediately is legion!

If we are interested, we can have a look round at sites (such as right here!) which tell us far more than an annoying popup would.

And I would rather not have anything getting in the way of what I am doing right now! So any new features should be very much background. For example, a temporary display area on the desktop. One which displays until acknowledged, and just disappears after a while even if not acknowledged.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Clark

diamond.g

macrumors G4
Mar 20, 2007
11,156
2,466
OBX
There is an argument that if you are happily using a system, just carry on. Ignore most new features.

The number of times I have seen something new, tried it, and dropped it almost immediately is legion!

If we are interested, we can have a look round at sites (such as right here!) which tell us far more than an annoying popup would.

And I would rather not have anything getting in the way of what I am doing right now! So any new features should be very much background. For example, a temporary display area on the desktop. One which displays until acknowledged, and just disappears after a while even if not acknowledged.
I understand, that is why I am torn about it.

Discoverability is something that I liked about macOS. My wife didn't have to ask how to do things because it just made sense. With all the new features added to macOS (which I'll be honest I don't use them either, lol) I know my wife won't go online and look up new stuff, so she will never know it is there. It is possible that a new feature could be something useful to her.

Microsoft tends to show off these new features (or co-op, aka screw up , old ones) to let folks know they exist. Which is also annoying when it happens on every update.
 

pshufd

macrumors G3
Oct 24, 2013
9,967
14,446
New Hampshire
I understand, that is why I am torn about it.

Discoverability is something that I liked about macOS. My wife didn't have to ask how to do things because it just made sense. With all the new features added to macOS (which I'll be honest I don't use them either, lol) I know my wife won't go online and look up new stuff, so she will never know it is there. It is possible that a new feature could be something useful to her.

Microsoft tends to show off these new features (or co-op, aka screw up , old ones) to let folks know they exist. Which is also annoying when it happens on every update.

If I want to look at new features, I go to the Zollotech channel and he does rapid-fire talks on new features for operating system updates. Sometimes I don't bother and sometimes I am curious about new features. But I like it to be my choice.
 

polyphenol

macrumors 68000
Sep 9, 2020
1,906
2,279
Wales
I understand, that is why I am torn about it.

Discoverability is something that I liked about macOS. My wife didn't have to ask how to do things because it just made sense. With all the new features added to macOS (which I'll be honest I don't use them either, lol) I know my wife won't go online and look up new stuff, so she will never know it is there. It is possible that a new feature could be something useful to her.

Microsoft tends to show off these new features (or co-op, aka screw up , old ones) to let folks know they exist. Which is also annoying when it happens on every update.
One of the things I liked so much about relatively early WIMP systems was the greying out of unavailable options.

Even when you couldn't use them, you grew familiar with their existence, their location in the GUI, etc. And if you think you want to use the feature/option, you appreciate that there is a reason you cannot.

So much of the time now, such things are totally hidden. No idea they exist. Nor where to find them.

Both Windows and macOS seem to love this deliberate obscurantism! Time after time, when I find out how to do something, I can appreciate how easily, how simply it works, especially under macOS. But would never have found it without using a search engine. And you have to realise a feature might exist in order to even think of searching for it!
 
  • Like
Reactions: diamond.g

ackmondual

macrumors 68020
Dec 23, 2014
2,435
1,147
U.S.A., Earth
Visited parents recently. Father got a new PC that's on win11, so I got to finally try that hands on! Nothing terribly exciting at this point, but that's fine. As long as it works, that's all I care about. The one new feature is when you drag a window near the top, you get multiple layouts to choose from in terms of arranging your windows in a side-by-side fashion, 2 one-quarters and 1 one-half, etc. So it does all that for you rather than manually sizing and positioning the. I'm sure some folks got utilities for that, but now it seems to be built in.
 

Ethosik

Contributor
Oct 21, 2009
7,820
6,725
Visited parents recently. Father got a new PC that's on win11, so I got to finally try that hands on! Nothing terribly exciting at this point, but that's fine. As long as it works, that's all I care about. The one new feature is when you drag a window near the top, you get multiple layouts to choose from in terms of arranging your windows in a side-by-side fashion, 2 one-quarters and 1 one-half, etc. So it does all that for you rather than manually sizing and positioning the. I'm sure some folks got utilities for that, but now it seems to be built in.
I do like that and the Snapping feature which I think was introduced in Windows 7. Mac should definitely have that built in. One area where Mac is better is with the multiple desktops, having each screen having their own and can independently swap each screen. Windows requires you to swap all screens at once.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ackmondual

ackmondual

macrumors 68020
Dec 23, 2014
2,435
1,147
U.S.A., Earth
I do like that and the Snapping feature which I think was introduced in Windows 7. Mac should definitely have that built in. One area where Mac is better is with the multiple desktops, having each screen having their own and can independently swap each screen. Windows requires you to swap all screens at once.
I miss this from working in Linux environments!
 

grmlin

macrumors 65816
Feb 16, 2015
1,108
775
I do like that and the Snapping feature which I think was introduced in Windows 7. Mac should definitely have that built in. One area where Mac is better is with the multiple desktops, having each screen having their own and can independently swap each screen. Windows requires you to swap all screens at once.
I don't want to touch Windows again for now but damn does the MacOS window manager suck
 

ackmondual

macrumors 68020
Dec 23, 2014
2,435
1,147
U.S.A., Earth
If I remember correctly, the window snapping features was first part of Windows Vista.
The distinction is Windows snap layouts. Win Vista to win10, you can move the window to the edges of a monitor to automatically get half sized windows. In win11, if you bring a window towards the top, you get a pull down which shows various layouts you can choose from. (see image below). You're saying that was built into Windows since Vista?....

image-255.png
 

opeter

macrumors 68030
Aug 5, 2007
2,680
1,602
Slovenia
The distinction is Windows snap layouts. Win Vista to win10, you can move the window to the edges of a monitor to automatically get half sized windows. In win11, if you bring a window towards the top, you get a pull down which shows various layouts you can choose from. (see image below). You're saying that was built into Windows since Vista?....

image-255.png
You are right, that is a new thing in Windows 11.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ackmondual

unrigestered

Suspended
Jun 17, 2022
879
840
i personally don¡t want windows to snap somewhere when using the mouse.
i like it using the keyboard via the windows + the arrow keys though, but i also don't need or want dozens of configurations either:
snap to left/right half of the screen, maximize/return to prior state, hide / unhide already satisfy my needs to the fullest.
more granularity with too many possible window positions just make things slower for me again.
 

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,572
43,556
i personally don¡t want windows to snap somewhere when using the mouse.
I have an ultrawide monitor that included utilities to snap windows (this predated windows 11). I hated it, and windows 11's version of that as well. I want to manually place and size windows for my own needs.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: keithop

kamikazeeMC

macrumors 6502
Aug 18, 2017
460
473
Perth, Western Australia
When I had dual screens (ultrawide + viertical to the side), I made a simple powershell script to open 5 browser windows in a set location and size. So much easier than having to snap and resize every time. I know there are tools that do this, but I don't like installing extra things I don't need.

Probably could have expanded that to every other program I run, but they generally stay in the same position when launched. For my minor OCD I have a wallpaper I can apply with a bunch of boxes, to help reposition when they go out of wack, like forgetting to close when updating graphics drivers..
 

inuragon

macrumors member
May 10, 2023
77
40
Microsoft and Windows needs to fix the spammy nature of everything from applications, to the notification system which prevents me from doing certain actions since its at the bottom right of the screen.
Would be nice if you could move the notifications to the upper corner at least, hate when i'm typing a comment on twitch and the notification blocks me from seeing what i type.
Also win 11 has plenty of nice updates like moving the start button to the middle (which can be reverted if you prefer) but i hate how MS still hasn't properly moved everything from control panel to the new settings app.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Technerd108

derekamoss

macrumors 65816
Jul 18, 2002
1,489
1,136
Houston, TX
Microsoft is killing Android apps on Windows 11

I was never really saw the value in this and it looks like most people didn't either. The PCWorld article seems to indicate that while support is ending next year they're already killing the store, meaning you can't install anything new
I tried it and didn't really enjoy the experience. Was a huge download, used way to much system resources for emulation IMO.

What I am hoping though is maybe this is a pretext to the upcoming Surface's using ARM release and decided emulation isnt good enough and built something for the new ARM surfaces that run Natively maybe through Phone Link or something. And mabe thats why I have been getting these Cross Device Experience Hosts updates multiple times per week in the app store.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2024-03-06 050313.png
    Screenshot 2024-03-06 050313.png
    15.2 KB · Views: 22
  • Like
Reactions: maflynn

rin67630

macrumors 6502
Apr 24, 2022
474
324
Let me just wonder why that discussion is placed under alternative to Mac Hardware?
There is another, more suitable place for that

Windows, Linux, macOS, & Others on the Mac​

 
Last edited:

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,572
43,556
Let me just wonder why that discussion is placed under alternative to Mac Hardware?
There is another, more suitable place for that

Windows, Linux, macOS, & Others on the Mac​

Because we're not talking about windows running on Macs, but rather most of the topics here and this thread is regarding hardware other then Macs.

Edit: another reason is the requirement of the TPM, and that while windows ARM exists the majority of the discussions is related to x86 which eliminates current Mac hardware
 
  • Like
Reactions: ozaz

maflynn

macrumors Haswell
May 3, 2009
73,572
43,556
I tried it and didn't really enjoy the experience. Was a huge download, used way to much system resources for emulation IMO.
I like the WSL, though in the current incarnation its actually running linux and not an emulation. I think the first version of WSL was an emulation but I could be wrong.
What I am hoping though is maybe this is a pretext to the upcoming Surface's using ARM release and decided emulation
Indeed, being ARM based it should be able to run android apps fairly easily. With that said, I find Microsoft's vision of windows 11 to be confusing at best. They seem to throw features in willy-nilly just to see what works, there doesn't seem to be a cohesive plan.

As for ARM based windows, I've tried it on my MBP and so far I'm unimpressed. I don't know about surface tablets running it but it lacked apps, and I had trouble with compatibility ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
 

pshufd

macrumors G3
Oct 24, 2013
9,967
14,446
New Hampshire
I like the WSL, though in the current incarnation its actually running linux and not an emulation. I think the first version of WSL was an emulation but I could be wrong.

Indeed, being ARM based it should be able to run android apps fairly easily. With that said, I find Microsoft's vision of windows 11 to be confusing at best. They seem to throw features in willy-nilly just to see what works, there doesn't seem to be a cohesive plan.

As for ARM based windows, I've tried it on my MBP and so far I'm unimpressed. I don't know about surface tablets running it but it lacked apps, and I had trouble with compatibility ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I use Windows 11 ARM on a regular basis using UTM and it's fine for my purposes. Performance is comparable to my i7-10700 which is pretty good though I'm sure that the experience is poor compared to 12th or 13th generation Intel machines. I will run Windows 11 x86 on Bootcamp if I need a non-virtual system remotely and I still have my 2 Windows 10 systems.

Yes, the UI feels like a mish-mash. I think that they tried to get something like Apple's dock for launching programs. Windows 11 is kind of like a Swiss army knife though the UI on my Swiss army knife feels more consistent. Most people have to use Windows so Microsoft can still make mistakes or look a bit crappy and they will still get a ton of revenue.
 

derekamoss

macrumors 65816
Jul 18, 2002
1,489
1,136
Houston, TX
I like the WSL, though in the current incarnation its actually running linux and not an emulation. I think the first version of WSL was an emulation but I could be wrong.

Indeed, being ARM based it should be able to run android apps fairly easily. With that said, I find Microsoft's vision of windows 11 to be confusing at best. They seem to throw features in willy-nilly just to see what works, there doesn't seem to be a cohesive plan.

As for ARM based windows, I've tried it on my MBP and so far I'm unimpressed. I don't know about surface tablets running it but it lacked apps, and I had trouble with compatibility ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
WSL and the Android Subsystem are different though or am I mistaken
 
  • Like
Reactions: ozaz
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.