W8 will have a terrible reputation, and W9 will come sooner than later. Like what happened with Vista and how fast W7 came after.
3 Years?
Longer than the gap between Windows 2000 and XP, or Windows 98 and 2000?
W8 will have a terrible reputation, and W9 will come sooner than later. Like what happened with Vista and how fast W7 came after.
Win8 will not flop, simply because it will be installed on every consumer PC from here on. You simply have no choice in the matter. Sink or swim time.
3 Years?
Longer than the gap between Windows 2000 and XP, or Windows 98 and 2000?
Let's not get personal here, its just an opinion. I have been involved in IT for over 30 years and in all that time Ballmer has never struck me as a gifted leader in any way. MS was doing fine when Bill was in charge but has languished under Ballmer and the stock price attests to that. I am no Apple fanboy either but I don't see any great leadership at MS.
I'm not even sure why you are being attack about the Ballmer comment you made. You were actually answering a question I asked in the original post.
3 Years?
Longer than the gap between Windows 2000 and XP, or Windows 98 and 2000?
It's literally no different from Windows 95 where you could set the start menu to show automatically at startup.
The simple explanation is:They will muddle through most likely like they did with Vista. I don't know why Ballmer is still CEO. Most companies would have ejected a loser like that years ago.
Shorter than the 5 year gap between XP and Vista.
Win 3.0 -> 3.1 -> 95 -> 98 -> 2k -> xp were all about 3 year gaps (or less)
Why does it suck for you?I have used Windows 8 RTM for a few weeks since release and I have to say it sucks. I completely expect to see this OS flounder once released and there is very little hype around it.
On macrumors? DuhYou know its doomed when everyone is more excited about the iPad Mini than this OS.
How do you guys and gals feel? Will Steve Ballmer retire in 2013 Q1 due to this massive failure?
I am undecided on Windows 8 yet, so not sure about whether it will fail or not, I haven't used it much and am not a huge fan of this metro stuff but it's different
I like changes in some of these things
for phones I went from iPhone to BB to Android
for desktop I went from Windows XP to OS X and now thinking of going back to Windows to try version 8
Oh for pete's sake... just press a single key and the start screen goes off into oblivion.You mean except for the fact that it isn't a start menu and it takes up the whole screen?
You mean except for the fact that it isn't a start menu and it takes up the whole screen?
Oh for pete's sake... just press a single key and the start screen goes off into oblivion.
Or... just start typing what you want to do and press ENTER.
Or... use one of the windows hacks that will bypass the start screen and even put a start menu on the Win8 task bar. (I'll even go so far as to guarantee the one day MS will actually add the ability to skip the start screen altogether).
Why does it suck for you?
On macrumors? Duh
You and others. That's why I think we'll see a MS-sanctioned method to disable/bypass it one day. For example, I can see where one could configure it based on the device that's currently using it. On a desktop machine you could disable it and boot right to the traditional desktop - complete with start menu. Or... when you detach the screen from your ultra-book or dock (thereby turning it into a tablet), it automatically switches to metro.Metro on the desktop doesn't work for me.
That said, I don't know why they haven't already done it. I suppose it's MS's way of forcing users to adapt to the new way of doing things.
It is them forcing people to use it. You could disable the Metro screen and bring back the old Start menu in the old developer preview via a registry hack, but they removed the work around afterwards.
...by completely removing the old start menu from the OS completely.
Though I do have one question. Yeah, the new Metro start screen does look different, but it performs exactly the same otherwise. To me, other than it quickly filling up the whole screen for a second, there are no disadvantages in using it. Why does everyone want the old start menu back so bad when the replacement works just as well?