Will always be a half baked app unless it goes multi platform. Too bad because it keeps getting better.
I accidentally texted my middle schooler a message about our taxes. I attempted to lock down her iPhone. Then was greeted with new opt-in 2 factor authentication. Drove to school. Had principle bring her phone to office so I could confiscate “phone for a minute. As I recall there still was no way to delete it (back then).Give option for:
15 Minutes
30 Minutes
45 Minutes etc...
This feature still won't save you from sending drunk messages tho.
I’m not sure whether I should laugh or stare in concern! But yes, this should address that specific issue at least. I’ve had a few “whoa, that was the wrong thread!” moments, but nothing as potentially catastrophic as that!I accidentally texted my middle schooler a message about our taxes. I attempted to lock down her iPhone. Then was greeted with new opt-in 2 factor authentication. Drove to school. Had principle bring her phone to office so I could confiscate “phone for a minute. As I recall there still was no way to delete it (back then).
Elon says you can change a tweet until someone replies.. hmm
Your mistake is caring what people thinkI have no idea why people would enable read receipts.
Nope, it's so others don't know whether I have/haven't read their message, and then expect an immediate response or similar. Privacy of thought leading to an action or not. ;-)Your mistake is caring what people think
Again, your mistake is caring what they think.Nope, it's so others don't know whether I have/haven't read their message, and then expect an immediate response or similar. Privacy of thought leading to an action or not. ;-)
Again, no. It's not about caring what they think. It's about them KNOWING WHAT I'VE DONE, for business decision reasons.Again, your mistake is caring what they think.
It seems like the problem isn’t read receipts but people’s boundaries/expectations re: availability. Just because I’ve read your message doesn’t mean I’m available at the moment, and just because you’ve read my message doesn’t mean you’re available at the moment. The IM at work has a similar issue, so people do the “hi [person]” thing. I’d rather they say hi but include the thing they need to say in the first message. I don’t want to get a ping only to have to wait on you to tell me why you’re pinging me. Send it all at once so I can know how to respond.Again, no. It's not about caring what they think. It's about them KNOWING WHAT I'VE DONE, for business decision reasons.
Yeah but Craig had an enormous amount of air time. He's great and I enjoy his presentations. I know, it's because he's in charge of both iOS and macOS software now. Just thinking of Craig and all that "speaking time". That had to be a lot of work on him!To be fair, Steve… had a tendency to monopolize keynotes. To the point where he became the public face of every team of the company. Tim Cook seems to prefer letting the lead developers/project managers/VPs for each team present (and get credit for) their contributions. The latter goes a long way towards dissociating Apple from being that one guy
Yes something like that. Hence just turning off read receipts, saves one the bother in the first place.It seems like the problem isn’t read receipts but people’s boundaries/expectations re: availability. Just because I’ve read your message doesn’t mean I’m available at the moment, and just because you’ve read my message doesn’t mean you’re available at the moment. The IM at work has a similar issue, so people do the “hi [person]” thing. I’d rather they say hi but include the thing they need to say in the first message. I don’t want to get a ping only to have to wait on you to tell me why you’re pinging me. Send it all at once so I can know how to respond.
Likewise the new “undo send” feature for Apple Mail will come in handy for doofuses like me. The feature has been quite helpful at work with GMail (which can be configured to undo a send for 30 seconds). On a laptop it is unnerving to fat finger while editing and send a half written email. (“If I hit Enter now is that going to new-line or send the email?”). Drives me nutsI’m not sure whether I should laugh or stare in concern! But yes, this should address that specific issue at least. I’ve had a few “whoa, that was the wrong thread!” moments, but nothing as potentially catastrophic as that!
Why do you care if someone knows which version of iOS you're running? It's not like you'll compromise anything personal to let someone know they can use a feature and actually have it work. There's nothing wrong with a small text at the bottom of the iMessage indicating if someone is running iOS 15.5 or iOS 16.Hardly common-sense. What is running on MY phone is not any business of some random yabbo that tries to send me a message.
Classic chat room (etiquette) problems since the days of IRC.It seems like the problem isn’t read receipts but people’s boundaries/expectations re: availability. Just because I’ve read your message doesn’t mean I’m available at the moment, and just because you’ve read my message doesn’t mean you’re available at the moment. The IM at work has a similar issue, so people do the “hi [person]” thing. I’d rather they say hi but include the thing they need to say in the first message. I don’t want to get a ping only to have to wait on you to tell me why you’re pinging me. Send it all at once so I can know how to respond.
Steve Jobs announced those at WWDC?We went from Steve Jobs annoucing the iPod, the iPhone, the iPad, the Macbook Air.... to some random guy annoucing we can unsend a message.
I don't care. That's why they don't need to know.Why do you care if someone knows which version of iOS you're running?
Whether or not I know someone sending me a text message personally is irrelevant to whether they get to edit what is now on my device.The people you should be messaging are hardly "random yabbos," they are people you know personally.
Those are the good uses for it. Sending an abusive or threatening message that then disappears is the bad side. If I or anyone I know was on the receiving end of a message like that, I would like the evidence to remain.Wait, what?! This is about fixing typos and that stuff (and auto-correct corruptions, I call ‘em auto-corrupt), and those “oh whoa, I shouldn’t have sent that” or “whoops, wrong chat thread!” situations. I really don’t get what you mean by “I hope this guy can’t mess with what’s on my phone” business.
I guess you could turn off iMessages and just send regular SMS.I honestly wish I could turn off the edit on my side so someone else is not affecting messaging on my phone
The message(s) are on iOS software, which isn’t something you own. You only own the hardware iOS runs on.I don't care. That's why they don't need to know.
Whether or not I know someone sending me a text message personally is irrelevant to whether they get to edit what is now on my device.