Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is a very misleading feature that is going to confuse & frustrate a lot of people. "Unsending" a message doesn't REALLY unsend it if the person has already seen the message on their lock screen. You have no idea if the person has already read your message or not.
 
My wife and my former boss (then current) have similar names. Let’s just say one time there was almost a huge problem and I dropped the phone when I realized what was about to happen and I had to defuse it like a bomb. Never again. This new feature would’ve been a nice backup assurance, especially for sending to people who are busy and don’t often check their messages.

Has anyone figured out if you can unsend a message that has been read if sent in that timeframe? Like ”IDK what you’re talking about, you saw nothing!” Hah. Doesn’t seem like that should work but idk.

I have no idea why people would enable read receipts.
My wife and I like a confirmation that another person received the message. Like when my wife is at the store I like to know she saw my message about needing to get something or I’ll have to call her if she doesn’t notice it. Or if she is busy and needs me to pick up the kids from whatever thing they’re doing. It’s useful. But yeah, for everyone else I leave that crap off!
 
  • Like
Reactions: mpavilion
This is awful, will 100% cause confusion and frustration. Unless there there are notifications of edits and deletions on both sides
 
You can edit or undo an iMessage by long pressing on it in an iMessage conversation and tapping on either "Edit" or "Undo Send." Note that these features are limited to blue bubble iMessages and do not work with green SMS messages.

There's also a new option to recover recently deleted messages, and deleted messages can be recovered for up to 30 days after deleting them. Deleted messages are located in the Recently Deleted section under the Filters list. Recently deleted works for both iMessage and SMS messages.

so can recipients undelete any messages sent to them and subsequently delted bu the sender or can only senders delete then undelete or recover in some way?
 
This is a very misleading feature that is going to confuse & frustrate a lot of people. "Unsending" a message doesn't REALLY unsend it if the person has already seen the message on their lock screen. You have no idea if the person has already read your message or not.
Yes, but having someone momentarily read a message you didn’t mean to send (embarrassing or otherwise) is a lot better than having it remain in perpetuity.

It’s so easy to send the wrong photo accidentally in iMessage. Or to add the wrong photo to the one you meant to send. Being able to unsend these is a positive, IMO.
 
  • Like
Reactions: scotty321
My sister who once accidentally sent a risqué photo to her copyeditor (her boyfriend’s name was Chris, copyeditor’s was Chrissy) is thrilled at the unsend feature. 😭
 
How do you know the recipient has not read the message? I’m assuming that if the message has been read, you won’t be able to “unsend” it.
How do you know of the recipient has iOS 16 and that the “unsend” will actually work?
Considering the whole point of text messaging is to send and receive communication instantly, and using my example where if someone sends me a text I get it and read it immediately on my watch, that feature is totally USELESS!
 
How do you know the recipient has not read the message? I’m assuming that if the message has been read, you won’t be able to “unsend” it.
How do you know of the recipient has iOS 16 and that the “unsend” will actually work?
Considering the whole point of text messaging is to send and receive communication instantly, and using my example where if someone sends me a text I get it and read it immediately on my watch, that feature is totally USELESS!
I would guess that if iMessage detects that the other user is on iOS 15 or older, the unsend button won’t appear.
 
Last edited:
how do you customise receipts on a per recipient basis? my settings just has the on/off switch. iOS 15.5
Go to any conversation thread and tap the contact's name. From there, you'll see a toggle for "Send Read Receipts".
 
I’m trying to picture how this is more than just a gimmick to some extent. If the recipient reads the iMessage, and is aware it can be deleted then they will take a screenshot if they want to keep it. I also ambivalent about why if you send me something and I receive it you having the power to take it back once it has arrived on —MY phone- I wouldn’t mind getting a notification saying “Bob wants to retract the embarrassing iMessage he sent: allow or disallow?”

The intended behaviour brings iMessages more in-line with popular tools like Slack where taking a message back, deleting it, editing it etc is common. Users tend to expect similar features these days, and in each scenario you could of course take a screenshot etc - but that’s the same everywhere. Also, not everyone reads every message immediately so there will be benefit for some.
 
You guys remember when Apple made their apps independent from the OS so they wouldn’t have to wait god knows how many months to release minor updates like this one? What happened to that?

Fair point, on the other hand if you bundle updates of smaller nature together it’s likely easier for the customers to see the value and enhance adoption. If they’d continue to release app updates individually all the time, knowledge retention would probably suffer and we’d all be complaining about these constant updates.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Howyalikdemapls
Couldn't this be used in nefarious ways by someone stalking and or harassing someone? Send harassing messages only to edit them shortly after getting rid of the proof.
 
Couldn't this be used in nefarious ways by someone stalking and or harassing someone? Send harassing messages only to edit them shortly after getting rid of the proof.
That’s the thing about any technology. There’s always a way to use them maliciously or benevolently, it’s just a matter of whether, on-net, it’s more beneficial to the bulk of people or more harmful. Reasonable people may disagree to what extent any given technology is beneficial or harmful. I think this happens to be net beneficial. (It would be really hard to use this for abuse since it has to be edited or deleted before the recipient has the ability to see and document the abusive message. If the recipient fails to see your abusive message because you deleted it in the 15 minute window [maybe the recipient is asleep or in the shower], the recipient wouldn’t even know.)
 
To be fair, Steve… had a tendency to monopolize keynotes. To the point where he became the public face of every team of the company. Tim Cook seems to prefer letting the lead developers/project managers/VPs for each team present (and get credit for) their contributions. The latter goes a long way towards dissociating Apple from being that one guy
And yet Apple is still, after 11 years, associated with that one guy.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.