Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

askme

macrumors newbie
Jan 31, 2007
21
9
Quick question for those of you already using Lion, if I have QuickTime 7 installed on SL and upgrade to Lion is it left alone and still functional or does it get removed like Rosetta?
 

ajcrow93

macrumors member
Jun 14, 2011
39
11
Quick question for those of you already using Lion, if I have QuickTime 7 installed on SL and upgrade to Lion is it left alone and still functional or does it get removed like Rosetta?

Quicktime 7 stays, which is lucky because version x is still terrible for anything other than playback of .mov files. The sooner they add more options for export and plugins the better. At the moment it's useless. :/
 

askme

macrumors newbie
Jan 31, 2007
21
9
Quicktime 7 stays, which is lucky because version x is still terrible for anything other than playback of .mov files. The sooner they add more options for export and plugins the better. At the moment it's useless. :/

Thanks for letting me know, at least one of my concerns with Lion is put to rest. I couldn't stand using QuickTime 10 on SL and it sounds as if it is still just as hopeless in Lion. :(
 

dentaldoc

macrumors member
Jan 9, 2008
31
2
Washington DC
Three Rivers: Real or F/X

There was a CBS TV medical series called Three Rivers in 2009 where they use very large, transparent displays. The opening of files and manipulation of data was reminiscent of what IOS or Lion OS might be, or become. It is so similar to what I have seen of these OS's that I wonder if this was a real OS prototype based on Apple's research. It appeared extremely realistic, and useful. On the other hand, perhaps it was all just f/x.

Does anybody have any information on the history of their very cool computer interface?
 

Cougarcat

macrumors 604
Sep 19, 2003
7,766
2,553
Quicktime 7 stays, which is lucky because version x is still terrible for anything other than playback of .mov files. The sooner they add more options for export and plugins the better. At the moment it's useless. :/

Perian works with Quicktime X...
 

NT1440

macrumors Pentium
May 18, 2008
15,089
22,155
Quicktime 7 stays, which is lucky because version x is still terrible for anything other than playback of .mov files. The sooner they add more options for export and plugins the better. At the moment it's useless. :/

What do you mean by "terrible"? I have no issues using quicktime X.
 

ajcrow93

macrumors member
Jun 14, 2011
39
11
What do you mean by "terrible"? I have no issues using quicktime X.

I meant the export options it presents. They all seem to be for idevices or sharing straight to websights. Quicktime 7 allows me to choose from way more formats to export as, something that I need to do a lot.

For playback quicktime x is fine, but for conversion at the moment it just stinks. Still I guess that's why it's called quicktime player.

Perian works with Quicktime X...

Doesn't it only work because it uses quicktime 7 in the background? Correct me if I'm wrong but I thought that was the case. I remember seeing somewhere that if you open up an unsupported movie file in x, in activity monitor you can see 7 as a background process to play it, even if you're using x.
 

stewacide

macrumors regular
Jan 6, 2002
196
39
Perian does indeed seem to launch using the Quicktime7 'legacy bridge', in 32 bit mode no less.

I've also noticed that Quicktime never seem to start when launching files from the finder: the Quicktime icon bounces then disappears. I have to launch it a second time for it to take. Some problem with inniating Quicktime7 perhaps.
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2011-07-11 at 9.35.34 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2011-07-11 at 9.35.34 PM.png
    160.8 KB · Views: 296

starlir

macrumors newbie
Jul 6, 2011
12
0
UK
Finder Column Auto-Expand

Maybe I'm missing something but the Auto-Expand button at the bottom right of a Finder Column when in List Column view has disappeared. Is there a replacement gesture/key combination to expand the column to the width of the longest file name?
 

Koifim

macrumors newbie
May 20, 2009
11
0
The Netherlands
Terminal Translucent view

I believe this is the new translucent view in Terminal? If so, I like it a lot!
 

Attachments

  • terminal_translucent.jpg
    terminal_translucent.jpg
    142.4 KB · Views: 556

LoganT

macrumors 68020
Jan 9, 2007
2,382
134
Please forgive me if this has already been answered.

In Lion, does iTunes stil hog the play/pause button like in Snow Leopard?

With Spotify launching tomorrow in the US, I really hope not.
 

Sneakz

macrumors 65816
Jul 17, 2008
1,221
347
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Please forgive me if this has already been answered.

In Lion, does iTunes stil hog the play/pause button like in Snow Leopard?

With Spotify launching tomorrow in the US, I really hope not.

iTunes no longer hogs the play/pause key. If there is another app that uses it currently in focus like QuickTime or VLC, pausing doesn't resume the play of music in iTunes.

When all apps are in the background (iTunes, VLC, QT for example), the app that last was in focus gets control of the play/pause key.
 

LoganT

macrumors 68020
Jan 9, 2007
2,382
134
iTunes no longer hogs the play/pause key. If there is another app that uses it currently in focus like QuickTime or VLC, pausing doesn't resume the play of music in iTunes.

When all apps are in the background (iTunes, VLC, QT for example), the app that last was in focus gets control of the play/pause key.

That is awesome. I will spend 29 dollars just for that.
 

richard.mac

macrumors 603
Feb 2, 2007
6,292
5
51.50024, -0.12662
for me in Snow Leopard the pause/play button works fine for whichever media app is in the foreground. if iTunes is in the background it pauses and the foreground window plays, then go back to iTunes and press the play key and it continues playing again.

edit: just tested Spotify and it continues playing, you will have to wait for Spotify to fix that issue.
 
Last edited:

Tom8

macrumors 6502a
Oct 28, 2010
848
71
This probably isn't the right thread for this question, but i didn't want to start a new one, for such a small issue.

When Apple releases the incremental updates to the OS do they ever bring in new features? i've had a Mac for about 8 months, and in the 2/3 updates i've applied, i've never got new features, except the Mac App Store. Obviously i understand Apple was lowering their focus on SL at this point due to Lion's progression. But can we expect some new features to be added in the 10.7.X updates, rather than just bug fixes etc?

TLDR: Are Apple likely to add any new features in 10.7.X updates, rather than just bug fixes?
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.