Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

rodknocker

macrumors 6502
Jul 4, 2011
298
10
I'm not at home right now so I'm not sure but if I remember right than you have to open NC and move the mouse to the top of NC. Then you should be able to disable it.

This is the DND feature. It will turn off the nc until the next day, if you don't turn it on again before.
 

satchow

macrumors 6502
Jul 11, 2011
467
186
Chrome+Flash combo still crashes OS.

It's pathetic how Chrome has 4 different release channels and still takes so long to patch up problems. It's also pathetic how they roll out known bugs from channel to channel.
 

arcade99

macrumors member
Jul 5, 2010
30
0
This is the DND feature. It will turn off the nc until the next day, if you don't turn it on again before.

Ok and what about the NC preferences pane in system preferences? You are at least able to disable all applications there.
 

Donka

macrumors 68030
May 3, 2011
2,851
1,443
Scotland
Is there a way to make a clean install from a pendrive? I don't see SharedSupport in DMG.

Yes, when you boot from the pendrive, start up disk utility and format your hard drive and then select the install OSX option. This will perform a clean install.
 

T'hain Esh Kelch

macrumors 603
Aug 5, 2001
6,475
7,410
Denmark
These are little crapplets that could just as easily have been offered in an app store. I'm a dual windows/mac user, as I'm sure many of you are, and I'm just not impressed with what passes for hype-worthy release on this side of the fence.

Dont get me wrong, I love the OS, but not unworthy fanfare. Windows enables little bits and compatibility fixes for newer tech in the service packs.

And voice dictation standard? Welcome to Windows Vista.

Airplay mirroring? Fancy wrapping on a decade-old function of most any computer.

New messaging client? Wow, couldnt have downloaded that 10 meg app if I had the urge. (sarcasm)

A new OS release with fanfare should have a new filesystem. Or perhaps different multithreading code. Or noticeable UI makeover. Or smaller running ram footprint and resource handling.

It's classic Apple marketing to include ANY change as a new "feature" just to drive up # of new features on the sales poster. Call if whatever you want, but enough of the foaming at the mouth for ML. Yeesh.
I love crying fanboys. Because you list a things *you* expect in an update, doesn't mean that everybody else does.
 

thomaskc

macrumors 6502
Aug 19, 2010
347
0
Well this thread just turned into a **** fight.. Can we just close it? Nothing productive is posted anymore anyway. ( including this post )
 

Davvido

macrumors regular
May 22, 2010
125
0
Poland
Yes, when you boot from the pendrive, start up disk utility and format your hard drive and then select the install OSX option. This will perform a clean install.

But how can I "burn" OSX to pendrive if there's no SharedSupport in the DMG?
 

rorschach

macrumors 68020
Jul 27, 2003
2,299
1,977
These are little crapplets that could just as easily have been offered in an app store. I'm a dual windows/mac user, as I'm sure many of you are, and I'm just not impressed with what passes for hype-worthy release on this side of the fence.

Dont get me wrong, I love the OS, but not unworthy fanfare. Windows enables little bits and compatibility fixes for newer tech in the service packs.

And voice dictation standard? Welcome to Windows Vista.

Airplay mirroring? Fancy wrapping on a decade-old function of most any computer.

New messaging client? Wow, couldnt have downloaded that 10 meg app if I had the urge. (sarcasm)

A new OS release with fanfare should have a new filesystem. Or perhaps different multithreading code. Or noticeable UI makeover. Or smaller running ram footprint and resource handling.

It's classic Apple marketing to include ANY change as a new "feature" just to drive up # of new features on the sales poster. Call if whatever you want, but enough of the foaming at the mouth for ML. Yeesh.

In case you somehow haven't gotten it by now, Apple is moving to smaller, incremental updates released every year or so rather than massive updates every 3+ years.

If Apple was charging $129 for it like they did before Snow Leopard, I'd see your point. But they're not. They're charging 20 bucks. I see many single-purpose apps that cost that much or more. Just looking at the App Store front page, "Comic Life" costs $30. :rolleyes:

Sorry, but I can't share your outrage given the pittance they are charging.
 

CmdrLaForge

macrumors 601
Feb 26, 2003
4,645
3,144
around the world
iWork will get updated the day Mountain Lion officially launches to support Documents in the Cloud

How you know? Just a guess?

----------

My source is common sense. The present iWork apps don't support documents in the cloud. Mountain Lion brought/activated support for document syncing to the OS. There's no point apple releasing the updated apps until mountain lion's release, because the GM is only for devs to use for testing their apps against, so there's no point issuing the update to iWork yet. Just like last year, when iWork was updated for full screen mode etc on Lion's release, it will be updated again the day Mountain Lion is released.

I see. Lets keep our fingers crossed.
 

screensaver400

macrumors 6502a
Jan 28, 2005
859
48
ML really does feel like a minor update to me... Just small enhancements here and there. Well worth $20, though.

I am having a few issues with the GM. Sometimes, when waking from sleep, my 2009 13" MBP won't connect to wi-fi immediately. If I try and click the menu bar icon, I get spinning beachball that kills the whole menubar (it's still visible, but the clock stops moving and clicks don't affect anything). I can't reboot... The only fix I've found is to do a hard, hold-down-the-power-button shutdown.

Safari seems sort of crashy too.
 

blow45

macrumors 68000
Jan 18, 2011
1,576
0
In case you somehow haven't gotten it by now, Apple is moving to smaller, incremental updates released every year or so rather than massive updates every 3+ years.

If Apple was charging $129 for it like they did before Snow Leopard, I'd see your point. But they're not. They're charging 20 bucks. I see many single-purpose apps that cost that much or more. Just looking at the App Store front page, "Comic Life" costs $30. :rolleyes:

Sorry, but I can't share your outrage given the pittance they are charging.
If just half of they are user base upgrades they will be making 1/2*50,000,000*$20

That's 500 million. For tweaking a few ui ****, staying a kernel behind ios, and coming up with a notes and reminders apps, and twitter.

No one in his right mind think they deserve even 1/5 of this money.

Oh, and another thing....Ios updates (you know that other os, the one they are actually putting some work in) are free.

and btw, your arguments about the cost of apps is simply ridiculous. These prices reflect the actual no. of people that are going to be purchasing the app which is infinitisemaly smaller than the market that's going to buy os x. All the more so since most people want to get rid of the fiasco that was lion from their system.
 

SlCKB0Y

macrumors 68040
Feb 25, 2012
3,431
557
Sydney, Australia
It's pathetic how Chrome has 4 different release channels and still takes so long to patch up problems. It's also pathetic how they roll out known bugs from channel to channel.

Do you - understand - what the role of the OS is in this? This is almost certainly an kernel/driver bug which is just being highlighted by an issue with Chrome/Flash.

Regardless of what the issue is with a browser, the kernel should not be letting itself get taken down by a wayward app.
 

satchow

macrumors 6502
Jul 11, 2011
467
186
Do you - understand - what the role of the OS is in this? This is almost certainly an kernel/driver bug which is just being highlighted by an issue with Chrome/Flash.

Regardless of what the issue is with a browser, the kernel should not be letting itself get taken down by a wayward app.

Yes I - understand - the role of the OS. Even if there is a underlying problem with OSX itself, the issue won't surface if there wasn't also an issue with Chrome causing it to begin with. The heart of the issue is still a problem with Chrome, whether that problem causes a crash of the program or a kernal panic.

This is still besides my point. They know about bugs in the Canary channel, yet they still push out the bugs to the Beta/Dev/Stable channels in subsequent updates. It's moronic.
 

cgk.emu

macrumors 6502
May 16, 2012
449
1
lol a service pack?

so you essentially thing a .x update should add things like voice dictation, social media integration(twitter/facebook), notification centre, airplay mirroring, new messages client etc.


you might not like any of the new features but those kind of additions are not found in service packs or .x updates

I can see his point, though. Just because a company says it is a .x release, doesn't make it up to the "standards" or benchmark of radically new features of previous releases. I suppose maybe that's it for the folks who are saying it is a service pack, yeah? It just doesn't live up to what they personally have come to expect. I on the other hand, well, I have my opinion but it doesn't really matter. I wish that people here would stop bashing one another over things that come down to opinion.
 

Crazy Badger

macrumors 65816
Apr 1, 2008
1,298
698
Scotland
Yup. Assuming all goes smoothly, the lights are green :)

Side note, glad they "fixed" Exposé by allowing ungrouping windows by application. With "TotalSpaces" bringing 10.5/6 "Spaces" to 10.7/8, this should be a solid update. Memory management is much improved.

I'm so happy I dipped into this thread and have just discovered TotalSpaces. Didn't realise how much I'd missed this and how much it's impacted my productivity. It's fantastic to have it back :D:D:D

And whilst I was looking also came across TotalFinder which is another great piece of software!

Thanks bedifferent and thanks BinaryAge! These should both be standard functionality in ML.

GM version seems pretty stable on my 2011 iMac and haven't had any compatibility issues other than LittleSnitch which now works after update. Not brave enough to update the MBA yet as that's where all the real work gets done...
 

rorschach

macrumors 68020
Jul 27, 2003
2,299
1,977
If just half of they are user base upgrades they will be making 1/2*50,000,000*$20

That's 500 million. For tweaking a few ui ****, staying a kernel behind ios, and coming up with a notes and reminders apps, and twitter.

No one in his right mind think they deserve even 1/5 of this money.

Oh, and another thing....Ios updates (you know that other os, the one they are actually putting some work in) are free.

and btw, your arguments about the cost of apps is simply ridiculous. These prices reflect the actual no. of people that are going to be purchasing the app which is infinitisemaly smaller than the market that's going to buy os x. All the more so since most people want to get rid of the fiasco that was lion from their system.

Nonsense. Absolute nonsense.

The cost is $20. If people look at the features and decide it is worth the price (as I absolutely do), then Apple deserves all the money they get.

No one in their right mind could think otherwise, because no one is forced to buy it. That means every penny Apple gets is from people who chose, freely and voluntarily, to pay.

Also, you are utterly clueless about how business works if you think the $20 is pure profit. No, Apple will not be pocketing $500 million in profit if half the user base upgrades.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.