Yet a single breach puts you not only to be newsworthy, but could allow others to legally seize your data without your permission or authorization: especially without a warrant. A subpoena would be all that is needed. But that is the price you pay for giving up the security of your data for the convenience of Software as a Service.
Yet you forget that the rest of us have also supported their hard work by paying for the license to use their software. But yeah, we're the ones that are delusional.
BL.
what happened in that breach, did people passwords go out? why people still subscribe to them
An average user risks far more by storing data manually than with a specialised cloud service. You don’t read it in the news when another commoner loses or leaks their locally stored keychain.
This is true, but when 1 loses his data its just 1 and its his fault. When a corporate loses data, its millions of people, and its the corporate fault that you willingly paid for....a subscription
That's an issue, say tomorrow the developer falls ill, hits the lottery, decides to go into the woods to live as a hermit. You just lost your development "team" Being open source someone else could pick up the mantle, but I think we've seen our share of abandoned projects and being open source doesn't gaurentee that keepass will survive, while the source code is available to others, doesn't mean someone or some team will decide to further the work.
I applaud the developer for providing such a great product and his dedication over the years, but I also need to find a product that doesn't introduce more risks.
You are missing the point, the point was 1 guy was doing password manager for 18 years for free. Somehow Agilebits with a team of developers and millions of user base is not enough funded to keep the app working so much so they have to force a subscription. It doesn't add up.
What adds up is that selling licenses is not as lucrative as subscription, so they are forcing subscription.
Note I am not against Agilebits selling $3/m subscription or $100 licenses.
I am not against Agilebits selling $100 license for local vaults, and $3/m cloud storage as a service.
I am against forcing only subscription and only in the cloud.
I wish people would stop using the word “forever” as it is unrealistic. Operating systems change, software gets updated, things break and get left behind, and then users move on to new hardware and new operating systems that don’t support those old apps. That is the nature of software. It’s an evolving moving organic kind of thing. Not a one and done kind of thing.
Instead the description should be “long term”. Let's say someone is 20 years old now and lives to be 100. They aren't going to be using the same iPhone and operating system they have today, 80 years from now. Or the same Macbook. It’s just not going to happen.
Actually Apps do continue to work. Some people do have old machines with older OS installed and run older software. The author of game of thrones (story of fire and ice) said he still does his writing on WordStar 4.0 . I run software thats out of date.
You don't get the new features, but the features you paid for still work which is fair. Want the new features, pay again or pay for an upgrade. Although its not paid, I am still on Mojave. I skipped Big Sur and Catalina. Mojave still works and solid for me.
So, although realistically you won't use it forever but if you meet the requirements the answer is yes it will continue to work forever unlike subscription that will freeze once the payment does not get through