Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
10 years ago there is no way I would have worn a watch, so I at least know people could change their perspective. I still don't want to carry around a giant slab in my pocket, I'd sacrifice wearing glasses for that. Especially if the glasses didn't need a case and closed very small. Hell, maybe they could even fit inside the phone back cover...and charge up like Airpods.

But it isn’t going to happen. The best you can get in glasses is going to be more like the Ray-Ban Meta than the Vision.
 
I wouldn't necessarily say I'm leaning into Vision Pro and VisionOS's interactive abilities when I say glasses. I'm simply talking about a display to replace a smartphone for now. So, Vision Pro to replace a laptop, Vision Glasses to replace a smartphone, I guess.

As my eyes get worse with age, no handheld display is enough, not even an iPad. I'm sure we'll have a solution to that problem in the next decade or so, though.

That’s more possible and probably what Apple should have done.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlyMackle
It'd be quite a story if a MACBook didn't run macOS.
to be fair, there’s nothing in the original rumor about what OS it will be running, and it's unlikely even Apple knows exactly how they're going to market this thing.
Personally, just going off of the Vision Pro, I fully expect this 20 inch folding screen with touch to run iPadOS and be marketed as an iPad.
that's probably something that won't be known until very close to the Announcement though.
2026 is still three macOS and iPadOS versions away.
 
to be fair, there’s nothing in the original rumor about what OS it will be running, and it's unlikely even Apple knows exactly how they're going to market this thing.
Personally, just going off of the Vision Pro, I fully expect this 20 inch folding screen with touch to run iPadOS and be marketed as an iPad.
that's probably something that won't be known until very close to the Announcement though.
2026 is still three macOS and iPadOS versions away.

Seems to me that Apple would love to dump MacOS in as many scenarios as possible. A laptop that runs iOS? The prospect probably makes Tim Cook drool.
 
to be fair, there’s nothing in the original rumor about what OS it will be running, and it's unlikely even Apple knows exactly how they're going to market this thing.
Personally, just going off of the Vision Pro, I fully expect this 20 inch folding screen with touch to run iPadOS and be marketed as an iPad.
that's probably something that won't be known until very close to the Announcement though.
2026 is still three macOS and iPadOS versions away.
I mean we can be pedantic I guess and point to that if we want.

But common sense tells us if this product is indeed called a MacBook, it'll run macOS or whatever macOS is called at the time.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NetMage
That’s more possible and probably what Apple should have done.
It's literally what Apple is doing. Vision Pro is a developer device for an OS intended for more than just that one device. There's a reason there is no "virtual reality" mode in a Vision Pro. It's augmented reality or a simple blackout setting with a background.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FriendlyMackle
I mean we can be pedantic I guess and point to that if we want.

But common sense tells us if this product is indeed called a MacBook, it'll run macOS or whatever macOS is called at the time.
Except we don’t know that it will be called a MacBook.
all reports about this product so far have come from the supply chain, who knows nothing at this point about marketing names.
And it’s unlikely the software being designed for a 2026 product is anywhere close to being final, wouldn’t be surprised if, assuming this product is real, and actually is going to be released, they are still having internal debates right now on How it should be marketed in which operating system it should run.
The report is just calling it a folding MacBook because that’s simply the easiest way to describe it. They could just as easily say a folding iPad.
 
It'd be quite a story if a MACBook didn't run macOS.
There was a rumor weeks ago that Apple was working on a foldable 20.3" iPad. This rumor is 20.2" MacBook.

Both sound incredible especially if the size can fold to be small or large functional footprint, meaning you want just half of the screen with keyboard while say on a flight and the whole screen when at a desk.

Hopefully the ecosystem is incorporated into the Vision Pro, MacBook's keyboard connects to Vision Pro.
 
So, that would require the OS to be a touch OS, so either iPadOS or make macOS “touchy”.
In either case, who would want this? Sure I can see a niche market, but very niche…

I think a foldable iPhone would end up with much higher market share than this one would ever get
 
  • Like
Reactions: Surf Monkey
Pretty sure that I am the target market segment here 😂

IMG_5759.jpeg

IMG_5761.jpeg
 
It's literally what Apple is doing. Vision Pro is a developer device for an OS intended for more than just that one device. There's a reason there is no "virtual reality" mode in a Vision Pro. It's augmented reality or a simple blackout setting with a background.

No it isn’t. It’s a consumer device. A consumer VR device. It doesn’t do actual AR.
 
Can someone explain what a MacBook with a foldable screen even means? Where is the keyboard located? Sounds more like a tablet than a laptop to me.
Think of a Galaxy Z Fold in clamshell mode. For reference, this is a 7.6" display.
IMG_6252.jpeg
 
No it isn’t. It’s a consumer device. A consumer VR device. It doesn’t do actual AR.
Here we go again... "Spatial" in their term for spatial computing refers to the space around you, not the space inside the device. Because it's AR. Why do you think it has LIDAR? What purpose does that have for anything but AR?
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Surf Monkey
Here we go again... "Spatial" in their term for spatial computing refers to the space around you, not the space inside the device. Because it's AR. Why do you think it has LIDAR? What purpose does that have for anything but AR?

The front is opaque. It isn’t AR. It’s VR with a video feed as a background.
 
I could also imagine a screen folded outwards by default, protected by a stylish magic-keyboard-screen-protector at all times, and whenever the keyboard is detached from the screen, this last will be already lit, and keyboard ready to be used.
Because honestly, I don't see a mac without a physical keyboard. Unless they start using those sci-fi kinda patents that let you "feel" the limits of the virtual keyboards via a micro electrical impulse ore some stuff like that.
So, it's gonna be THAT cool, or a physical keyboard.
People have been trying to get rid of the QWERTY keyboard for decades now. I remember trying the one handed Frogpad.

Would be neat if they put magnets on the back of a MacBook's display that you could then attach a 11/13" iPad Pro to the screen using a similar magnet design as the Magic keyboard. An attached sidecar like this but with one charger.

 
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
  • Like
Reactions: Surf Monkey
The front is opaque. It isn’t AR. It’s VR with a video feed as a background.
AR does not mean you have to be able to see through. It means that what you're seeing has to be the actual world around you. VR is strictly NOT the world around you. Meta/Occulus call it AR as well...guess everyone's wrong but you. Thankfully, it doesn't matter, because the same computations are required whether it's a lens or a screen.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Surf Monkey
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.