Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Just upgraded mine to 16 gigs of ram and a 660 ti. (I left the regular card in so I can see boot screen too) and mines been running great! It has so much potential for such an old computer and it would be sad to see it finally being put down. However it'll probably support Windows for a long long time, so that's a plus.

I hadn't thought of that, thanks for the idea. I just picked up a MP 1,1 a month ago as well for a cheap, already upgraded the to 32G, updated to 2,1, getting ready to upgrade the graphics card and the Processors.
 
image_zpsadkhzrzf.jpeg
Just spamming up the board to reiterate how much I love this damn computer.
 
Internet, office suite, games, homework, etc. (we are a family of 5...)
Two of these Macs were recovered from my job, and the three others are cheap second hands.
 
I have this idea, call it stupid as I don't have any clue if it is possible at all, but what if it is possible to combine the 1,1 and 2,1 firmware with the 3,1 firmware so the motherboard of the 1,1 and 2,1 are capable or running same CPU's as the 3,1 as far as I know they both use LGA771 CPU's. And with a CPU upgrade to the X5460.

This would mean that the SSE 4.1 CPU requirement would be no problem. Right?
 
I have this idea, call it stupid as I don't have any clue if it is possible at all, but what if it is possible to combine the 1,1 and 2,1 firmware with the 3,1 firmware so the motherboard of the 1,1 and 2,1 are capable or running same CPU's as the 3,1 as far as I know they both use LGA771 CPU's. And with a CPU upgrade to the X5460.

This would mean that the SSE 4.1 CPU requirement would be no problem. Right?
It'd be a cross talk problem probably. 2 different chip sets between the two and even though the boards look pretty similar, they're quite different. Combining the two probably would result in a bricked board. Also I don't think it'd be possible to even inject the microcode into an EFI flash... But Who knows. They've been wanting 64bit efi for years for our Pros, that never happened (and if it did, it still probably wouldn't allow us to install newer OSes with out hacking). I'm not saying it's impossible but we need someone that can crack the code to do it.
 
It'd be a cross talk problem probably. 2 different chip sets between the two and even though the boards look pretty similar, they're quite different. Combining the two probably would result in a bricked board. Also I don't think it'd be possible to even inject the microcode into an EFI flash... But Who knows. They've been wanting 64bit efi for years for our Pros, that never happened (and if it did, it still probably wouldn't allow us to install newer OSes with out hacking). I'm not saying it's impossible but we need someone that can crack the code to do it.
A while ago in this thread I think I linked to some mod that adds sse 4.1 support to bios based motherboards by adding microcode for lga 775. It would need to be ported to work with uefi though.
 
A while ago in this thread I think I linked to some mod that adds sse 4.1 support to bios based motherboards by adding microcode for lga 775. It would need to be ported to work with uefi though.
I just downloaded the EFI updater from Apple, he "EFI" file ends in .FD which looks like it's an Insyde BIOS (Intel BIOS) file. Intel BIOSes have never been cracked to even add microcode so if it is an Intel BIOS we have problems.
 
@hwojtek I think that mikecorp wanted to say that he's running 10.11.3?
MP1,1 came with Tiger preinstalled so he is hardly running Panther on it... Or is he? :)

@mikecorp , Going from 10.11.3 to 10.11.6 will replace your boot.efi files, so you'll have to have either daemon working, or other OS X to replace those files from.
 
thanks guys. yes 10.11.3 will try to update to 10.11.6 tomorrow. (Y) I do have back up just in case.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.