I wish employers in this situation would not sugar coat things and tell it as is really is 'Daniel, your performances have been crap, we do not see things improving so are letting you go'.
For months you lot have been saying Daniel's performances have been crap/rubbish (use your own words) and that he needs to go. You've been short, sharp and direct to the point. Why can't the employer do that. Why must employers always have to protect the person they are firing? If they are rubbish, tell them they are rubbish. Don't go and give them a glowing PR statement when the reason they are leaving is because they are rubbish
For months you lot have been saying Daniel's performances have been crap/rubbish (use your own words) and that he needs to go. You've been short, sharp and direct to the point. Why can't the employer do that. Why must employers always have to protect the person they are firing? If they are rubbish, tell them they are rubbish. Don't go and give them a glowing PR statement when the reason they are leaving is because they are rubbish