Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Too expensive. $2499 was the top end of my budget, though I can scrape more cash together for it if the D300's bench well in games (Some FirePros bench well, others...piss poor). My big question is...wtf are the D300s? I've been researching FirePro GPUs since before the MacPro was announced for work purposes, and I haven't heard anything about the D-Series GPUs.
 
Too expensive. $2499 was the top end of my budget, though I can scrape more cash together for it if the D300's bench well in games (Some FirePros bench well, others...piss poor). My big question is...wtf are the D300s? I've been researching FirePro GPUs since before the MacPro was announced for work purposes, and I haven't heard anything about the D-Series GPUs.

Most likely rebrands of the current line of Fire Pros.

AMD recently renamed the 7970 as the 280X, and they probably did the same with the current FirePros. At best they're a tiny refresh, but we'll find out soon I think.
 
But the $2,999 Mac Pro will hardly be more powerful than a $2,999 iMac.

You think? I don't know about the quad core Xeon against an i7, but whenever the dual gpus are put into play, it should be a lot faster. Well, or so we can guess, since the "D300" isn't a known graphics card.
 
But the $2,999 Mac Pro will hardly be more powerful than a $2,999 iMac.

Not in GB per dollar, but certainly in total (CPU+gpu) Gflops per dollar.


They said 3x4k monitors, but they didn't say how many total monitors at lower resolutions. AMD cards typically support 6 I believe.

It sounded like he said 2 displays on TB plus a third on HDMI. Have to watch it again.

I'm also looking for the standalone version of the production video.
 
You think? I don't know about the quad core Xeon against an i7, but whenever the dual gpus are put into play, it should be a lot faster. Well, or so we can guess, since the "D300" isn't a known graphics card.

The single cpu xeons pretty much don't differ at all from the i7's.
 
What is frustrating though, is this was just another sneak peek without any proper pricing points, pre-orders or even a release date. It could be 31st December when it is launched.

Tot. agree!

More of the same, only this time with a fancy video showing the build process WTF was that all about...who cares and who are they fooling..this to me proves once again that Apple is all about showing off and that its form before function...this should be a pro machine, Pro's don't care about how the computer looks, it should perform...point blank

I can't help but have the feeling they are targeting fan boys, hipsters...etc with this computer....look how cool its build, with robots and all...:rolleyes:

I'm not impressed....innovation my a**
 
I thought it was a decent price compared to a lot of post and comments on the podcasts I listen to guessing the starting point would be around $4,000. So the $3,000 price to me doesn't not seem that high.
 
Not in GB per dollar, but certainly in total (CPU+gpu) Gflops per dollar.




It sounded like he said 2 displays on TB plus a third on HDMI. Have to watch it again.

I'm also looking for the standalone version of the production video.

It is 6 displays.
 
Crappy as you can't even order one it seems until December, so we don't even know what a BTO will cost. So they'll be available in February like the iMacs were.

----------

Funny how Phil had to justify the high pricing...basically he knows its high.
 
It would be nice if they offered a version with one low end GPU for the guys that only run CPU intensive tasks. I wouldn't use the GPUs much at all.
 
I'm buying an iMac. At least I won't have to fork up money for a 2nd monitor, since I have 1 already.

If it had ben $3K for hex-core with 512SSD, I would have bit, but those two upgrades will be another $750 minimum I'm sure. :mad:


EDIT:

ON THE APPLE STORE:

6 core, $3999. OUCH!!
 
Well, shoot.

Quad core for me! :)

On the plus side, shipping will be free. ;)

ScreenShot2013-10-22at22903PM_zps2563db05.png
 
$2,999 for a quad core? This will join the cube in about 18 months.

My entire workflow is built around CPU cores, not GPU cores for rendering.

A 4 core @ $2,999 plus $2500 for adding 3 thunderbolt enclosures & a dock for additional cabling needs vs $5500 for a 16 core Dell that doesn't require a rat's nest of cables and is easily user-upgradeable.

I have looked at moving to dell, but I was hoping I could avoid it. Oh well.

Your kind says the same thing with every Apple product. And you always end up getting one anyway and proclaiming it the best device ever.

What about a new display to go with this?

Yeah was hoping for 4k displays, but still probably a year away from that.
 
$3,999 for the 6-core with only 16GB of ram and the D500s.... and still 256GB SSD! :eek:

The maxed out Mac Pro will cost around $8,000.
 
Very disappointed with pricing and confused over the 12Gb unless it uses 3Gb RAM or doesn't take advantage of all 4 slots. I'd expect the 8 core to be $2999. The graphics people can go on about the GPUs all they like, for audio I just need multiple displays (2+) and lots of CPU power. 2 BTO Mac Minis with 2.6Ghz i7s in a rack mount enclosure using either Logic X or Reaper to share COU power between the systems would still be cheaper and equally (or even MORE) powerful for a lot of people and cost roughly the same if not £100s less.

Well if it can drive 3 4k displays thats 12x 1080p resolution. At minimum I would expect 6 1080 displays with the 6 TB ports.

It can also drive a 4K screen off the HDMI 1.4 port so that accounts for 1 of the displays so Thunderbolt likely has a limitation of only 2 additional 4K displays if you use a 4K with that.
 
Why not just one channel then? No one would notice right?

Can't get 12GB DIMMs ;)

In seriousness, for most usage there is little difference between 2, 3 or 4 channels and even 1 DIMM is barely different for general computing tasks.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.