Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I was thinking... what about Wine? Of course it's been 64-bits for quite a while, but will it be able to run 32-bit windows apps? I'm pretty sure it will, but I'd be great if someone could test it out. I have *loads* of windows games running off Wine.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BarbaricCo
Similar question - I have only a handful of 32-bit apps, and I plan on upgrading to Catalina. Should I delete these apps beforehand, or will Catalina just 'wipe them out' and I'll have the associated SSD space recovered, automatically?

The only 32-bit app that I'll need to find a workaround for is the Logitech Harmony set-up app. Bewildering that they haven't updated this, considering it still is the required tool to set up their current remotes.
Your incompatible apps will remain as-is afaik. Catalina won’t let them run, but it won’t delete them automatically either.
[doublepost=1560306004][/doublepost]
I was thinking... what about Wine? Of course it's been 64-bits for quite a while, but will it be able to run 32-bit windows apps? I'm pretty sure it will, but I'd be great if someone could test it out. I have *loads* of windows games running off Wine.
Last time I test Catalina, wine staging is disabled. I have never figured out a way to use command line version of Wine.
 
I was thinking... what about Wine? Of course it's been 64-bits for quite a while, but will it be able to run 32-bit windows apps? I'm pretty sure it will, but I'd be great if someone could test it out. I have *loads* of windows games running off Wine.

According to the Wine FAQ, the 64 bit version of WINE has problems with macOS:

OSX has a ABI incompatibility with Win64 - OSX overwrites a CPU register that Win64 applications expect to remain untouched. Apple can’t change the ABI because there are already 64 bit OSX apps that expect things to work that way. A potential workaround may be to run Wine inside a CPU emulator like qemu, but that is anything but easy.​

Source: https://www.winehq.org/wwn/364#Wine64 on Mac OS X
 
  • Like
Reactions: VMukhtarov
Good to know!

I'm still hoping someone will come up with a "Rosetta" like solution for 32-bit apps in the future, though.
 
Rosetta solution won’t happen didn’t for IOS
We should boycott big companies like Epson that won’t update apps for a couple of year old devices. Some little developers may not have ability but the big guys no excuse
 
  • Like
Reactions: crjackson2134
According to the Wine FAQ, the 64 bit version of WINE has problems with macOS:
There is a workaround for the segment register issue, but it may still fail, but extremely rare according to the developers.
 
There must be something wrong with your Steam auto-update mechanism. The Steam client has been 64bit for almost a year now:
https://www.reddit.com/r/apple/comments/927845/steam_is_now_finally_64bit/
I have successfully been able to install it on a clean install of the first Catalina beta and it works just fine.
Update Steam manually.

There was a problem with the auto updating system. I made sure I had the 64-bit version when it became available. The auto update system has at some point pulled in something that is 32-bit, although once launched it was the 64-bit part.

Steam was disabled after first installing Catalina for me, simple solution was to redownload the client from the website.
 
I've been having all kind of issues with the Steam client, I'll definitely try removing it completely from my Mac and downloading it anew.
 
I've been having all kind of issues with the Steam client, I'll definitely try removing it completely from my Mac and downloading it anew.

After I did that I'm no longer getting the warning about Steam being a 32 bit application.
 
  • Like
Reactions: donluca
The Logitech keyboard probably won't work because it's wireless and requires a piece of software called Logitech Control Center to connect.

However, both Logitech and Epson have supported their software respectably heretofore, so I expect them to update their drivers -- even though their email tech support guys don't seem to have a clue. If they haven't done that before 10.15 is released, I'll delay the upgrade on the supposition that they'll have new 64-bit drivers soon.
But, just in case, I have a query pending at Vuescan about 64-bit addressing in their program.
Thanks for the tips.

I have a similar keyboard and never installed the software


It will work as a regular keyboard but some of the special keys might not do anything
 
Last edited:
wine 64bit for Mac has been available for years. I guess they found a way to workaround that issue.

CodeWeavers (CrossOver developer) is currently working on a wrapper that will allow 32 bit Windows programs to run under their 64 bit version of WINE from Catalina. Right now Mojave issues a warning even when using the 64 bit version of CrossOver to run a Windows 32 bit app.
 
I doubt Crossover will be able to provide the support for 32 either. The change over is going to be software and hardware level. They can tinker with API's to the end of the road. But SIP will not be persistent in the Gold release and it won't matter because exec32 will be disabled in EFI at that time. The processor will not be accepting those calls anyway from the dev notes - it will be calling a disconnected number. It's a good thing. It was time to make this happen and kick the 16/32 legacies to the curb, both windows and macOS have been in this weird limbo state for almost 15 years trying to keep backwards compatibility for zero payoff and handicapping forward progression. I really dig that the nextstep attitude has returned to Apple. They did push the envelope at one time and that's what made people want to use a Mac, it's time they really got back to the Mac and this looks more like that than any keynote or ad campaign.
 
As I look through my list of 32 bit apps a couple are actually Apple apps. Some like Quick Time 7 has been replaced by Apple but 7 still exists. Would be nice if Apple got rid of these old versions when they installed new ones. Or get rid when they can't run anymore with the next update.
 
I have found that quite a large number of 64 bit apps contain bits and pieces of 32 bit code in such things as update checkers or parts of installers and things like that. I wonder how Catalina will handle these things. Will the entire app not run, or will the update checker (in that case as an example) fail to run? I predict a lot of stuff won't be fully compatible for a long time after release unless it is a high volume current product.
 
What I don't understand is these devs lagging so far behind. They have seen 64 bit coming for a very long time!
 
It was time to make this happen and kick the 16/32 legacies to the curb,
Sad. I still have a handful of awesome games that will be 32bit forever. At least Microsoft Windows will support 32bit longer than macOS for sure.
 
Sad. I still have a handful of awesome games that will be 32bit forever. At least Microsoft Windows will support 32bit longer than macOS for sure.

Completely agree. This decision was all about Apple and the cost structure of support, and not at all about their customers. There is zero benefit to the end users, whether they use 32 bit apps or not. Only the end user is allowed to define what apps are fun and/or useful.
 
I’m surprised that companies like Epson don’t update their software. It isn’t the hardest thing to do. I know they want you to buy new but I trust companies that update more. This requirement isn’t a surprise

In 5 years I’ve had five print driver and scanner updates from Epson.
 
As I look through my list of 32 bit apps a couple are actually Apple apps. Some like Quick Time 7 has been replaced by Apple but 7 still exists. Would be nice if Apple got rid of these old versions when they installed new ones. Or get rid when they can't run anymore with the next update.
The only reason I’ll be staying with Mojave (my Mac has still 5-6 years of life left) is Quick Time 7. The new QT is awful compared to 7.
 
The only reason I’ll be staying with Mojave (my Mac has still 5-6 years of life left) is Quick Time 7. The new QT is awful compared to 7.

i've always depended on QT7, but... what's missing for you? you can edit, record, loop... think i'll survive without it (either way, QT7 alone is not enough to have kept me from moving to 10.15).
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.