iMac no longer makes sense any more with Apple silicon. Mac mini is a lot more powerful than before, getting a Mac mini with a display is a better choice. Or get the Mac Studio if you need more power.
At least you can reuse your display when you upgrade your computer…
zones?For Pete's sake, Apple, release a new version of the 32" XDR display with more zones and cheaper pricing!
At 32 inches, a larger iMac would offer the same dimensions as the 6K Pro Display XDR, which Apple sells for $5,000.
Apple's afraid people would end up buying a $2,000-$2,500 32" iMac instead of a $5,000 Pro Display XDR and $999 Pro Stand.If Apple wasnt a scumbag company they'd do the right thing and at least let users have the option of using the computer as a display only.
Too much to ask for, Apparently.
I loved my 27" iMac from 2010. Can't they bring that back with a M3 pro chip? I mean really.
I don't know about "scumbag company". I think they do a lot right on many fronts.If Apple wasnt a scumbag company they'd do the right thing and at least let users have the option of using the computer as a display only.
Too much to ask for, Apparently.
Since when did the Pro Display XDR use mini-LED?
THIS! My 2017 iMac was legacy-ied, so I struggled in vain to make it work as a display with a new Mac mini. Wonderful 27" 5K monitor, perfect condition. Ended up going with a Mac mini and Studio Display. Now I can just switch out the mini when I need to upgrade. I doubt the current iMac sales make it a priority for Apple to update, but my experience to upgrade is another reason my Apple love continues to erode.I have been a long time fan of the iMac, and still own a G3, G4, and many Intel iMacs, but I will most likely not be purchasing another one.
Apple should bring back Target Display Mode for the iMacs, so once the performance no longer meets the needs of the user, the display can still be used for another Mac.
I wonder how many iMacs with perfectly working, beautiful displays are thrown away or recycled because the user needs something faster?
Doubt the 'affordable' part of it though, at least short term. Seen in a longer perspective, for sure.Meh! I don't care about any iMac, give us an affordable 32 Apple monitor!
A mini-LED display has Full Array Local Dimming (FALD) for the backlight—little squares of backlight lit by the mini-LEDs. The squares are larger than pixels, typically they are several pixels square. I'm calling the number of these independently-addressable mini-LEDs "zones". You see it in the specs for FALD monitors.zones?
The technology just isn’t there yet.2025? What is taking so long for a larger iMac?
That's been a long time. I mean, we had a 55-60" tv in like 1995.It's huge! 32 inches was a proper TV size not too long ago.
The Pro Display XDR always had mini-LED. It has 384 FALD zones, if I recall correctly.
I have seen the light.My usual take: don’t buy a very good display that is forever stuck with a good but non-upgradable and non-repairable computer. Get a Mac mini or studio and a good monitor.
Or get an iMac if your company is paying for it and its future replacement.
Dell now sells a 6K 32" monitor for $2,600. After Apple releases a new 8K 34" ProDisplay for $4,999 plus stand/mount, they could easily sell a 6K 32" monitor for $3,300 and find plenty of buyers willing to pay the Apple premium.Doubt the 'affordable' part of it though, at least short term. Seen in a longer perspective, for sure.