Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Status
The first post of this thread is a WikiPost and can be edited by anyone with the appropiate permissions. Your edits will be public.
The most SSD´s have no Problems.

There is a problem related to APFS formatted NVME Samsung with the Phison Controller and Trim.
This results in long Boot Times after some Time.
Bash:
log show --predicate "processID == 0" | grep spaceman
If you use HFS this Problem is not present.

This is true for Mac Hardware and Hackintosh.

In addition many NVME Drives do not work with Apple´s implementation of the Drive´s Power States.
This leads to Heat and High Battery Drain.

The Crucial P5 which runs on Hackintosh has drained constant 9W even in an external Case.
For older Hardware the Crucial P2 was a good Choice and i have upgraded multiple 2014 MacMini or MBP with it.

As of Today i would try to use a WD SN570 because of the Lanes and PCIe Version it makes mostly no sense to use a WD 850 or x or even a WD SN 770 and for older Hardware i would try to find a Crucial P2 or sometimes if possible just use an SSD as the Crucial MX500 which is a Mac Darling and works forever.

The Crucial P3 has proven to be a bad choice for both Hackintosh and Mac.

There are several NVME running "somehow" in older Mac when formatted before but also most are not able to realise Firmware Updates so better do this before upgrading and save the Original.

First success does not implicate work on the long run.

I do not have old Hardware anymore but use WD SN 570 / 770 / 850 in an Hackintosh and 2 WD SN 770 in external enclosures @ my MBA M2.

I have upgradet many Mac´s with NVME and they are mostly running till Today.
Fair comment genexx, but do bear in mind that depending upon whether economy of cost or faster performance take priority, choosing PCIe 4.0 is a good decision for future upgrade flexibility and is not necessarily much more expensive than a PCIe 3.0 NVMe.

Further, with the new USB 4.0 Zike drive 7666, desktop PC and iMac can benefit from a fast EXTERNAL boot drive running over 3000MB/s and offers up to 16TB capacity. All dependent upon your model and which capacity NVMe you purchase.


Mcfix may be interested to see the WD Black sn850x performance in a Zike drive with the Asmedia ASM2464PDX chip will possibly exceed PCIe 3.0 NVMe performance in an iMac motherboard.

As time passes, chip design for external drives will presumably, only get faster.

Cheers.

Screenshot 2024-10-15 at 8.59.27 pm.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The most SSD´s have no Problems.

As of Today i would try to use a WD SN570 because of the Lanes and PCIe Version it makes mostly no sense to use a WD 850 or x or even a WD SN 770 and for older Hardware i would try to find a Crucial P2 or sometimes if possible just use an SSD as the Crucial MX500 which is a Mac Darling and works forever.

That's exactly the route I've taken after learning about the successful shared experiences in this thread; proven hw that have worked ; thank again to all the contributors.

I can say that one year later after the upgrade done, the iMac is still working perfectly;
You could read about my experience a few pages earlier in this thread.

Of course, you may be tempted to try a newer model / manufacturer and/or with better performances on the paper;
But today's global race for profitability with planned obsolescence means that newer products could actually be more beta versions that the end user will finish making reliable.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: genexx
Fair comment genexx, but do bear in mind that depending upon whether economy of cost or faster performance take priority, choosing PCIe 4.0 is a good decision for future upgrade flexibility and is not necessarily much more expensive than a PCIe 3.0 NVMe.

Further, with the new USB 4.0 Zike drive 7666, desktop PC and iMac can benefit from a fast EXTERNAL boot drive running over 3000MB/s and offers up to 16TB capacity. All dependent upon your model and which capacity NVMe you purchase.


Mcfix may be interested to see the WD Black sn850x performance in a Zike drive with the Asmedia ASM2464PDX chip will possibly exceed performance in a PCIe 3.0 on the iMac motherboard.

As time passes, chip design for external drives will presumably, only get faster.

Cheers.

View attachment 2437586
Intel or
I had a look into the ASMEDIA Enclosures as well and they are indeed running best with the WD SN 850 and x, but for internal use in Mac Hardware, where possible, there is a Max PCIe v3 if not v2 and less lanes.

For external i use the 2 2TB WD SN770´s only as Backup in 10Gbit enclosures because i have enough internal Space and the USB-C Hub cheap makes 10Gbit and at the second USB-C TB3 there is the Monitor connected.

For me it was cheaper and much better anyway to buy 1TB internal as to add TB3 Hub and Enclosure TB3 or USB 4 in the mid 2022 when i bought my MBA M2 16GB/1TB/10C BTO 65W.

Even in the Hacky there is PCIe 4 internal since the Upgrade to 11th Gen CPU but the WD SN 850 serves as Windows Boot because the Gaming takes Place on it sometimes when my Daughters want to hang arround in my Office.

I do not need this Performance.
 
I had a look into the ASMEDIA Enclosures as well and they are indeed running best with the WD SN 850 and x, but for internal use in Mac Hardware, where possible, there is a Max PCIe v3 if not v2 and less lanes.

For external i use the 2 2TB WD SN770´s only as Backup in 10Gbit enclosures because i have enough internal Space and the USB-C Hub cheap makes 10Gbit and at the second USB-C TB3 there is the Monitor connected.

For me it was cheaper and much better anyway to buy 1TB internal as to add TB3 Hub and Enclosure TB3 or USB 4 in the mid 2022 when i bought my MBA M2 16GB/1TB/10C BTO 65W.

Even in the Hacky there is PCIe 4 internal since the Upgrade to 11th Gen CPU but the WD SN 850 serves as Windows Boot because the Gaming takes Place on it sometimes when my Daughters want to hang arround in my Office.

I do not need this Performance.
Hi Genexx,
We each plan according to our needs.

I mentioned the Zike drive as it offers the ability to run an external boot drive on Intel or ARM Macs. So although my iMac cannot use all PCIe 4.0 sn770 speed, if in future I buy an ARM Mac I can now reuse the sn770 in a USB4 Zike drive and get higher speed when connected to the M? Mac . It is a good future proofing option.

Also; Intel upgraders now have a very fast, true USB4/PCIe4.0 external boot option to upgrade without opening the iMac.


I was not expecting you to race out and buy one.
Cheers.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As of Today i would try to use a WD SN570 because of the Lanes and PCIe Version it makes mostly no sense to use a WD 850 or x or even a WD SN 770 and for older Hardware
The SN850 made sense to me, even though it's a PCIe 4.0 SSD, and my 2019 i9 iMac is PCIe 3.0, for two reasons:

1) Even a PCIe 4.0 SSD is, for most operations (esp. random reads and writes), not going to reach the max bandwidth afforded by PCIe 3.0. Thus you should get more performance by using a faster PCIe 4.0 SSD even in a PCIe 3.0 machine.

2) The cost difference between the SN850 and a top-quality PCIe 3.0 SSD was small, particularly for the size I used (2 TB).
 
Thanks for your reply. Do both the 970 evo and 970 evo Plus models work well on the iMac 2019? Are there any performance differences between them on the device, and which one is more recommended?

I did some more research and found on Reddit that some users have reported issues with the 970 EVO (or Evo Plus) trimming with iMac 2019, and that it can sometimes take up to 5 minutes to boot up!!
I'm even more confused now. I'm probably going to have to go with the WD , but I've also heard of panic boot issues with some of their models, like the sn770!! What about the sn750 or sn550? Are there any issues with those?
Hi Mohammed,
This response may be too late, but I can confirm you will be safe with the SN770. I have a 2019 Intel iMac 3.7Ghz i5 which I upgraded last August 2023 and it has run smoothly with the DW sn770 and a SATA Samsung 970 Evo installed. Reports blaming the sn770 for kernal panics deserve comment.

I had several kernal panics and sought help. trs96, a moderator from tonymacosx86 pointed out the Sintech blade was possibly the source of the problem as Sintech advertise an incompatibility with the WD sn770. The Sintech blade has previously been a favourite recommendation on Macrumors. (Before the sn770 existed).

This is what it says on Amazon about the Sintech NGFF adapter:

• Support Intel NVMe SSD : 600p, 660p, 760p,Toshiba XG3-XG4-XG5-XG5p-XG6 line,Samsung: 960 Evo, 960 Pro, 970 Evo, 970 Pro,WD:v1, v2 and v3,MyDigital: SBX - BPX
  • NOT Support: PM981,950 Pro,WD Blue NVMe SN570 /SN770
I purchased both a long No-Name adapter and a short NFHK from Ali Express. Given the tight fit of these adapters, I found the short adapter/NVMe interface rigid. This would leave the sn770 exposed to maximum air circulation and cooling. I do have a Heatsink on the NVMe even though it runs cool (30C - 40C), for general usage; (non Gaming or small volumes of data transfer).

Since using the cheap adapter I have had no kernal panic problems whatsoever and flawless performance with speeds of 2900-3100 read/write.

In my experience your safest choice is WD sn770. It is a fast, cost effective WD NVMe. The sn850 and sn850x designed for Gamers, also work in iMac according to Macrumors members who have posted on this blog.

Note the need for Kapton tape if connection pins are visible between NVMe and socket canopy as insurance against shorting. See Page 1 comment by Dobrink in Macrumors.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I expressed myself badly, I wanted to know if even after some time there are no problems with the boot times.
I am booting from an original Apple 120GO NVMe SSD and am experiencing a long time ~90 seconds until the white Apple on black background appears, someone knows why?
After that it boots normally.
 
I am booting from an original Apple 120GO NVMe SSD and am experiencing a long time ~90 seconds until the white Apple on black background appears, someone knows why?
After that it boots normally.

How long is a piece of string?
What tests have you initiated and which logs considered? Is this a Fusion drive? Which computer model and operating system?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi Rin,
I checked your earlier post:

I have got an iMac 2015 27" Retina with a defective FD blade.
I replaced that blade with a 210GB NVME SSD that I got left from an upgrade of a Macbook 2015.
They are both identical.
Once repaired, i did not recreate a fusion drive.
Instead I installed macOS on the NVME 120GB drive and formatted the 3TB HDD as HFS+.
Finally I moved my home directory to the HDD.
That alternative setup works very well. The system boots in a breeze and the user data on the HDD are fast enough.
Everything is very snappy.
And MUCH safer than the unreliable FD.

That is a very slow boot time in my experience.
Given you have replaced the NVMe blade earlier this year and you stated ‘everything was snappy’, what are the circumstances which have changed to create 90 sec startup?

Is your 210GB ssd formatted APFS? If not, that may account for slow boot time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hi Rin,
I checked your earlier post:

I have got an iMac 2015 27" Retina with a defective FD blade.
I replaced that blade with a 210GB NVME SSD that I got left from an upgrade of a Macbook 2015.
They are both identical.
Once repaired, i did not recreate a fusion drive.
Instead I installed macOS on the NVME 120GB drive and formatted the 3TB HDD as HFS+.
Finally I moved my home directory to the HDD.
That alternative setup works very well. The system boots in a breeze and the user data on the HDD are fast enough.
Everything is very snappy.
And MUCH safer than the unreliable FD.

That is a very slow boot time in my experience.
Given you have replaced the NVMe blade earlier this year and you stated ‘everything was snappy’, what are the circumstances which have changed to create 90 sec startup?

Is your 210GB ssd formatted APFS? If not, that may account for slow boot time.
Yes it is formatted APFS, but until the Apple comes (too slowly) only the FAT-formatted EFI might be used, if ever.
Once booting from the NVMe, everything is normally snappy.
The 90 sec until the Apple comes were always there, I did just not mention.
 
1. Do as @mbosse, above suggests. If NVME SMART report is good, I would do the following:

2. Trash everything, reopen the iMac and withdraw then refit the NVMe. Often blades are not fully or correctly fitted as many in this Blog have found including myself. The symptoms of error vary from the obvious to the obscure. No-one likes repeating previous work but it is the only way to confirm the NVMe has been fitted properly.
While the NVMe is out, clean Mac with vacuum nozzle held over the PCIe cowel, and clean blade pins with isopropyl alcohol. Do not underestimate the importance of a clean, tight fit. You are dealing with very sensitive equipment. Wear surgical gloves so you do not inadvertently transfer static while working. Using bare fingers runs unnecessary risk.

3. If the 90 secs problem remains:
Try free software Ulbow from https://eclecticlight.co/consolation-t2m2-and-log-utilities/ scroll down to Ulbow.
This makes logs more accessible and makes reading a bit more understandable to lay people such as myself.
Directions are provided.
Then you can post the logs to get assistance here at Macrumors, or elsewhere such as Apple forum or tonymacosx86.

4. Live with it:
If you do not want to refit NVMe now, live with it. Should system slow further or other glitches occur over time
- go to 2.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I decided to practice on my dying 2013 before upgrading my new to me 2017. It was an interesting operation, but not too difficult with a guide and the experience of repairing close to a hundred PC laptops.

And even if i really admired the engineering and how well made the iMac was on the inside i cannot help to hate whoever decided to place the SSD beneath everything or the guy who decided to glue the screen instead of using magnets.

When i had disassembled everything i decided to see if i could reassemble it again. First i had to try to get the lower part of the screen aligned correctly three times because the glue stuck immediately and it was a few millimeters off. The third time the screen got a little crack. When everything was connected the Mac refused to boot.

Oh well, it was kinda expected. At the moment the motherboard, sorry, logic board decorates my office wall as a reminder of the machine which gave me ten and a half year of service.

The idea of using a USB-C SSD as a boot drive is quite appealing at the moment.
 
I decided to practice on my dying 2013 before upgrading my new to me 2017. It was an interesting operation, but not too difficult with a guide and the experience of repairing close to a hundred PC laptops.

And even if i really admired the engineering and how well made the iMac was on the inside i cannot help to hate whoever decided to place the SSD beneath everything or the guy who decided to glue the screen instead of using magnets.

When i had disassembled everything i decided to see if i could reassemble it again. First i had to try to get the lower part of the screen aligned correctly three times because the glue stuck immediately and it was a few millimeters off. The third time the screen got a little crack. When everything was connected the Mac refused to boot.

Oh well, it was kinda expected. At the moment the motherboard, sorry, logic board decorates my office wall as a reminder of the machine which gave me ten and a half year of service.

The idea of using a USB-C SSD as a boot drive is quite appealing at the moment.
I didn't even bother trying to do it myself. I just brougt the iMac and new SSD to my local campus bookstore, which is an authorized Apple service center, and they installed it for $100.
 
2017 27" imac 1TB Fusion drive, 3.4GHz quad i5, 24GB DDR4, Radon Pro 570 4GB

upgrade
WD_BLACK SN770 2TB
OLVINS M.2 NVME SSD Convert Adapter Card Upgrade for MacBook Air (2013-2017)

This upgrade is not for the faint hearted! prior to the upgrade I put the SN770 2TB into a
Thunderbolt 3 ORICO Technologies Co.,Ltd. SCM2T3-G40 and loaded Ventura on to it; boot took about 30 seconds and Black Magic test returned:

Now this is not bad so if thats good enough for you I would advise you to stop there and just boot to the external
drive; if you are not happy with this performance then read on

Orico.jpg




I upgraded the 32 GB SSD Blade to WD_BLACK SN770 2TBand the adapter, as I said not for the faint hearted, I left the 1TB sata drive in erased it and just use it as a storage for files i don't need quickly.

Booted up into Ventura and boot was about 25 seconds Black Magic disk test was

NVME internal.jpg


so internal blade is about 20% faster on writes and 25% faster on reads com[ared to thunderbolt port.

I used a combination the following instructions

problems:-
I would take the psu and logic board out together as its very hard to release the locking tab on the DC Power Cable and I ended up breaking the locking tab pin but the cable is is such a tight fit going back that the locking tab is not needed.

Testing before removing the tape from the new seals I made the mistake of putting the display closed up thinking it would not seal however there was some of the orignal tackyness after clearing off the old seals and this stuck on the seals so when I came to open it to remove the tape it was stuck shut and I had to be carefull getting it apart so use a small wedge to keep it from sealing whilst you do a check that all is working.

Don't for get to test camera and microphone as well as the sd card slot before you seal up

Because of the problems with the seals I got the alignment .5mm slightly out with the case on one side but its hardly noticible unless you are looking for it and I decided to quit while I was still ahead also I did not have a spare seals to do it again so you might want to order two sets of seals if you are a perfectionist they don't cost a lot.

Advice:-
look very carefully at the cable connectors as some have locking levers, don't just yank them out

Take your time doing this and do it with good lighting as there is a very small cable coming up from the bottom of the frame where the Apple Logo is which is mentioned in the video but not in the ifixit instructions (That I could find) this has an even smaller locking lever so be carefull; this may not be a problem for young eyes and nimble fingers but as I am 72 and have poor eyesight with the start of cataracts then it took me ages to plug the cable back in hence take your time.

Wrote this up as I spent days investigationg what would work and what doesn't.

Hope it helps
 
Hi all! First post so please go easy one me!
So I have a Late 2014 iMac 27" and I love it, so I want to keep it running.. as does everyone here I'm sure.

I've recently used Opencore Legacy patcher, and that's allowed me to run the latest version of Sequoia, 15.1.1 and it works flawlessly. Took me a couple of tries to get my head around the boot patching, etc, but it's fine now and works really well with no issues.

I want to update it's internals though, as I currently have a fusion drive consisting of 256gb SSD and 3tb Hard drive.
I've purchased (but it's not arrived yet) a 4tb Fanxiang S770 7400mb 4TB drive, and the Intel i7 4790k CPU to replace my current one 3.5 i5. I already have 32gb of Ram, so that's not an issue.
I've also got the nvme adapter, new screen tape (as a kit with the cutter) and thermal paste for the CPU.

My main job is in IT so I'm happy enough with physically doing this upgrade, just wondering if there are any gotchas in my 'plan' anyone can think of?

I'm planning on using an external caddy for the new SSD to format it with AFPS and then install Big Sur to it by booting to a USB stick with the BigSur installer on it, so I have a clean install of Big Sur. Then I'll run open core legacy patcher to bring it up to Sequoia, with the root patching.
Once I'm happy I can boot and run the mac from the new SSD connected externally with Sequoia installed, I'll then open the mac up to do the upgrade.
The upgrade will be to remove the existing Hard disk (and it's SSD cable) as it's old, I don't need to space, and I don't want it sat in there getting hot, and spinning (or giving the click of death in the future).
I'll also pull the main board (watched loads of videos on this) and replace the in built SSD with the new one I have, using the adapter.
Lastly, I'll swap the CPU for the i7 4790k.
Assuming that goes well, I'll then put it back together loosely taping the screen until I'm sure it's working. I'll then use Migration assistant to restore all my files and apps from the latest time machine backup I will have taken beforehand.

Does this plan sound ok, and will the SSD I've bought be ok? I could always send it back if it's not going to be compatible, but I've read that the Fanxiang SSD's are really good for the price.

Cheers.
 
Hi Turboman 1971,
I think you should have posted prior to committing to your purchases to get wider comment.

Given you plan to put your 4TB SSD in a caddy, and maximise the 4TB SSD speed may I suggest you look at the external Zike Drive as it seems like the only drive with a chip capable to offer PCI 4.0 speeds in an external container. Plenty of reviews have confirmed it is faster and cheaper than any other external at time of writing. https://ziketech.com/products/zikedrive-usb4-40gbps-nvme-m-2-ssd-enclosure-z666

Read all the user feedback. It probably will not include your Fanxiang so contact Zike and get their tech support to confirm compatibility.
Regarding price of Zike drive, I find the company very flexible. I placed the drive in the trolley and left it there without paying. A few days later an email arrived offering me a 20 percent discount. I ignored it. a few days passed by and another email arrived offering a 30 percent discount. I accepted and paid $135 for a drive advertised at $189 at the time. Current price is advertised at $169. I reckon with patience you will get that price reduced.

You say you also intend to replace the internal Nvme ssd. What is the replacement you propose? I can say that it probably needs to be a WD Black for trouble free performance. The best value for money is the PCIe 4.0 WD Black 770, particularly as you have plenty of ram to support the Host Memory Buffer. I installed a 2TB SN770 a year ago in a 2019 iMac with PCIe 3.0. AJA gives me write 2921Mb/ps and read 3079Mb/ps. and the computer runs flawlessly. Should you need in future to transfer the 770 NVMe to an external you will benefit from increased PCIe 4.0 speed depending on the choice of caddy.

Otherwise your plan seems sound with one small detail. I took advice and used a strip of Kapton tape over the exposed contact pins of the NVMe in the PCIe slot as there have been cases of shorting between contacts and metal shield. It may not be necessary but it seems sensible to me to prevent a possible problem. Be sure to firmly insert NVMe SSD in the PCIE slot as failure to do so is a recurring theme in these posts.

Read page one of this blog to see which NVMe SSD options are proved to be compatible with your 2014 iMac. before installing your SSD. Which Brand and model do you have?

Cheers,
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Turboman1971
Hi all! First post so please go easy one me!
So I have a Late 2014 iMac 27" and I love it, so I want to keep it running.. as does everyone here I'm sure.

I've recently used Opencore Legacy patcher, and that's allowed me to run the latest version of Sequoia, 15.1.1 and it works flawlessly. Took me a couple of tries to get my head around the boot patching, etc, but it's fine now and works really well with no issues.

I want to update it's internals though, as I currently have a fusion drive consisting of 256gb SSD and 3tb Hard drive.
I've purchased (but it's not arrived yet) a 4tb Fanxiang S770 7400mb 4TB drive, and the Intel i7 4790k CPU to replace my current one 3.5 i5. I already have 32gb of Ram, so that's not an issue.
I've also got the nvme adapter, new screen tape (as a kit with the cutter) and thermal paste for the CPU.

My main job is in IT so I'm happy enough with physically doing this upgrade, just wondering if there are any gotchas in my 'plan' anyone can think of?

I'm planning on using an external caddy for the new SSD to format it with AFPS and then install Big Sur to it by booting to a USB stick with the BigSur installer on it, so I have a clean install of Big Sur. Then I'll run open core legacy patcher to bring it up to Sequoia, with the root patching.
Once I'm happy I can boot and run the mac from the new SSD connected externally with Sequoia installed, I'll then open the mac up to do the upgrade.
The upgrade will be to remove the existing Hard disk (and it's SSD cable) as it's old, I don't need to space, and I don't want it sat in there getting hot, and spinning (or giving the click of death in the future).
I'll also pull the main board (watched loads of videos on this) and replace the in built SSD with the new one I have, using the adapter.
Lastly, I'll swap the CPU for the i7 4790k.
Assuming that goes well, I'll then put it back together loosely taping the screen until I'm sure it's working. I'll then use Migration assistant to restore all my files and apps from the latest time machine backup I will have taken beforehand.

Does this plan sound ok, and will the SSD I've bought be ok? I could always send it back if it's not going to be compatible, but I've read that the Fanxiang SSD's are really good for the price.

Cheers.
Have a read of this

and

It helped me in making my decision

Good luck :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Turboman1971
"I'll also pull the main board (watched loads of videos on this) and replace the in built SSD with the new one I have, using the adapter."

Hi Progers885,
The often recommended ST-NGFF2013 adapter is good but NOT suitable for WD Black SN770, it induces kernal panic. A cheap Ali Express suits WD Black sn770 in my experience.

Also check your model for sleep/wake issues on Page one of this blog.

Cheers.
 
Last edited:
As an Amazon Associate, MacRumors earns a commission from qualifying purchases made through links in this post.
Thanks everyone.
The ssd I’m going to try is only going to be external in a usb caddy while I’m installing the OS and putting the open core patcher on to allow Sequoia to be installed. It means I’m not taking my mac apart until I know the hard drive is good and the OS install has worked ok. I’ll then move it from the caddy into the inside of the Mac, replacing the inbuilt ssd and hard drive while doing so.
The ssd I’ve ordered is already on its way, but it has a 3 month ‘return it if you don’t want it’ guarantee, so if it’s not compatible I’ll just send it back and get a western digital one.
I checked the hibernation bug issue and it looks like I should avoid it, but I have. Spotted the terminal commands to resolve it if it happens.
Watch this space! I’ll report back as I’m going along. 😊
Good call on the kapton tape. I’ve got a load of that already for my 3d printer.
 
Hi all. So, further development. Doesn't look like the Nvme hard drive is going to work.
I'm tempted to therefore just leave the inbuilt nvme and change the main hard disc to an SSD. What's a 4tb SSD that will work please?
Cheers.
 
Well, I have already told you the best internal Nvme SSD value for money is the WD Black sn770 if you are prepared to spend the money available in 1TB or 2TB. There is a 4TB WD Black 850x which is fine internally but price wise a bad choice as the 4TB will runs at PCIe 3.0 speeds of +/- 3000 MBps. Despite being a capable of PCIE 4.0 speeds of 6000MB/ps.

If you want speed and capacity, the Zike caddy with a 4TB Lexar nm790 is a good option which one user testimonial gave PCIE 4.0 speeds around 6000 MB/ps! (Zike site claims a more conservative 3900MBps) for a budget. (Approx AUD $150-00 for the caddy and AUD$350-00for the NVMe).

If you are happy with Sata speeds of 450/500 MB/ps, reasonably wide range of Sata SSD will work in your computer if you check out the experience of others on Page 1,2,and 3 etc of this blog.
I happen to have a 2TB Samsung 870 Evo in my iMac. There are cheaper options.

If capacity is more important than speed Use the 256 SSD for the O/S and put the rest of your files on the Sata ssd.

Cheers
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Turboman1971
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.