It's definitely nice of them.Shifting the burden to the consumer from the environment is what Apple did.
Any additional purchases that people would make to get a power adapter they need or headphones they need would certainly be extra profit that wouldn't have been there before (on top of the additional savings that would come from not including and packaging those accessories).The alleged extra profit is coming from where?
I just can’t believe the complaining about it. You’re buying a 20k-50k car. If you have tires laying around, cool. If not, buy some.I just can’t believe the complaining about it. You’re buying a 500-1000 phone. If you have a charger, cool. If not, buy one.
Yeah this is why they're so full of it. Every phone I've sold, the charger goes with it.That assumes I'm keeping the charger from iPhone 11. Many people who hand down the device or sell it, the adapter is part of the transfer.
I've never bought an aftermarket charger. My Apple chargers and cables would outlive the devices they came with. Eventually when it was time to sell my old iPhones I would sell them with the charger.So people really used those included chargers? I may have used those standard bricks once or twice in a cycle of ownership. Pre-COVID, I traveled so much for work that I needed multi-port, multi-type bricks. Then I bought a wireless charger just for travel. I have 4 bricks now plus a couple of USB-C wall outlets as well.
I guess if you hand down devices regularly, maybe, but this isn’t a point to be upset over for me.
There is a certain logic that seems to make sense. For some consumers, there is no impact and these consumers will use their available chargers and cables, and a win for the environment. For other consumers they might have to purchase a charging brick and/or headset. At least this is discretionary.It's definitely nice of them.
I do not believe there is "extra profit" as in keeping the price the same, the margins on the iphone hardware went down and is being offset by the lack of charger and headsets. It also isn't guaranteed Apple will reap any benefit in extra purchases related just to this, as there is a healthy secondary market for MFI accessories.Any additional purchases that people would make to get a power adapter they need or headphones they need would certainly be extra profit that wouldn't have been there before (on top of the additional savings that would come from not including and packaging those accessories).
So, Apple gets to decide on something that let's them essentially double dip on benefits while consumers just get the negative impact. Nothing wrong with a company making money, but let's not be naive about it being some magnanimous thing or something other than a purely beneficial decision for them with the burden being shifted on the consumer.
If you are buying a 20k-50k car, it is probably new and has some tires from the factory.You’re buying a 20k-50k car. If you have tires laying around, cool. If not, buy some.
Yes. You missed the point.If you are buying a 20k-50k car, it is probably new and has some tires from the factory.
I just can’t believe the complaining about it. You’re buying a 20k-50k car. If you have tires laying around, cool. If not, buy some.
the point was clear, but the analogy was poor.Yes. You missed the point.
The consumers do (while the company benefits from it all on top of it)?We have to offset the environmental costs the chargers and earbuds make because now we’re mining material to make magnets.
Why can't consumers talk about something that affects them where they get less than before? Should consumers be happy about that? Seems like a rather strange position to take.This is childish. You can go back and forth with analogies all day. I can’t believe my car doesn’t come with a gas station!
Be a grown up and just deal with the problem. Many people have an adapter. Many people don’t. The latter group should buy one if they need one, not hyperventilate.
Read countless posts on here and Reddit from people defending Apple's potential move of not including the power adapter with the 2020 iPhones because they had plenty of them lying around at home already. And yet not a word from anyone now that we know the new iPhones will ship with a USB-C Lightning cable that is incompatible with all previously included iPhone power adapters (except iPhone 11 Pro and Max).
Seems like it works if it makes the point.the point was clear, but the analogy was poor.
Probably this. I think Apple shouldve just done it but this way it buys some transition time for people and for the tech to mature.Personally I can’t see iPhones ever going to USB C. Port-less will come next, hence MagSafe.
I should’ve said the attempted point was clear.Seems like it works if it makes the point.
Why can't consumers talk about something that affects them where they get less than before? Should consumers be happy about that? Seems like a rather strange position to take.
That would be subjective and something that can also be discussed.Oh people can talk about anything, but not everything that’s said is good.
How is the new phone usb-c. Doesn’t it have the same lightning port as previous phones. It’s the cable that has one end usb-c to plug into a usb-c ported power adapter. All my two dozen power adapters that have usb connectors work fine with new phone As the cable ends that plug into phone are lightning. Except for the several real old cables that have the original huge connector.I agree that it would’ve been nice for them to include the USB-C brick for a couple generations. I’ve got a million old USB bricks. I don’t need any more of those. But this is the very first device I’ve owned that’s been USB-C. It isn’t ubiquitous quite yet.
So the problem isn’t the lack of power brick, but rather apple included a cable.....should have left that out as well.Not quite given that what was said earlier didn't mention anything about consumers losing out in the process.
Which isn't consistent with a brand new and different cable now being included that doesn't work with those power adapters that everyone supposedly has.
That would have at least followed the actual presented logic, but wouldn't have addressed the part of it being worse for the consumer.So the problem isn’t the lack of power brick, but rather apple included a cable.....should have left that out as well.
Next year when they remove the lightning port.They should have included the Magsafe. That is what we should be talking about!