New here, huh?If Apple had only included a 5w usb c power adapter there wouldn’t have been any complaints.
There'd just be different complaints.
Edit - whoops, I see @edhchoe beat me to it.
New here, huh?If Apple had only included a 5w usb c power adapter there wouldn’t have been any complaints.
1. Buyers of used iPhones expect me include everything that was in the original iPhone 11 box.
2. The existing cable belongs with the iPhone 11.
Once again, your solution seems to rely on shortchanging buyers of pre-owned iPhones.
Of course I can buy a new charger. That's the whole point. I need to buy a new charger. The charger was included in previous iPhone boxes.
No, the power adapter and lightning cable belongs to you right up until the point when you give it away.Not if I sell or give my iPhone 11 to a family member. The charger belongs to the iPhone 11.
1. Why is the buyer more important than yourself? Are you saying you can't sell an iPhone without a charger, a Lightning cable and EarPods in the US? No-one will buy it?
2. That is something you have decided for you. Do you only have one USB-A or USB-C charger and only one Lightning cable? I have one USB-A charger (came with an iPad) and one USB-A to Lightning cable which charges two iPads and one iPhone. Which means I have two iPad chargers and one iPhone charger I don't use. You don't have any USB-A charger you can reuse or you can share with another device? Now, maybe you are one of the unlocking ones only having one charger and one lightning cable, yes, then you must buy a charger.
But think about next year. In 2021 you don't have to buy a new charger since you can reuse the charger you bought this year. And when you sell the iPhone 12, the buyer will not expect it to come with a charger since it never did. And every year going forward you can continue to use your charger with a continuing stream of new devices, whether they be iPhones or other devices.
You solution boils down to: spend money to buy some that should come with the device in the first place.
No, the power adapter and lightning cable belongs to you right up until the point when you give it away.
Point being you have a charging solution in your hands - and it is your choice whether you force yourself to buy a new charging solution or tell the recipient of the iphone11 that they need to go buy a charging solution.
Your solution results in a lower selling price for my iPhone 11. Or course I can keep the adapter. Or buy a new one. Both "solutions" cost money.
Apple passed down a problem and some of you guys are eating it with a grin.
This is not about the cost of a $20 adapter. It's about greed. If it's so cheap, then why doesn't Apple include it? Or at least include a voucher? If I have an existing power adapter, why should I subsidize Apple from my existing collection of adapters?
There are a few threads in iPhone Accessories forum.
What brick do you have?
This is the crux of many people's differing views.
What should-be vs what-is.
Other than because that's how it's been or because some people might have to buy something, I'm not seeing any explanation of why it should be.
Lots of stuff requiring charging up - and some rather expensive stuff at that - doesn't come with a power adapter.
Why should a phone be one way or the other in today's world where USBA & Lightning are nearly ubiquitous, and USBC is increasingly commonplace?
It's a done deal. Now other vendors will likely follow suit and the world will adjust and everyone will start to ratchet down the entitlement.Your solution results in a lower selling price for my iPhone 11. Or course I can keep the adapter. Or buy a new one. Both "solutions" cost money.
Apple passed down a problem and some of you guys are eating it with a grin.
This is not about the cost of a $20 adapter. It's about greed. If it's so cheap, then why doesn't Apple include it? Or at least include a voucher? If I have an existing power adapter, why should I subsidize Apple from my existing collection of adapters?
I'm still on the fence about it. Part of me is upset with the type of cable Apple gave us. LTNG to USB-C is fine, but it's the cheaper one that will fray in a few months to a year.
Another part of me IS in the category that has a drawer full of adaptors from the iPod Classic all the way up to the last few iPhones we own (x3). Because of distance learning, we have about 3 more from the iPads our kids use.
Lastly, I have a bunch of USB-C adaptors and cables from Apple and IKEA and a wireless charger or four from IKEA.
I know some are mad, but I do still agree with Apple's choice. Just wish it was the braided version, or if the phone was $80-100 cheaper since the cable, adaptor, and headphones normally cost about that much.
This is the crux of many people's differing views.
What should-be vs what-is.
Other than because that's how it's been or because some people might have to buy something, I'm not seeing any explanation of why it should be.
Lots of stuff requiring charging up - and some rather expensive stuff at that - doesn't come with a power adapter.
Why should a phone be one way or the other in today's world where USBA & Lightning are nearly ubiquitous, and USBC is increasingly commonplace?
Not new here. The complaints would have been only 5w, which has been common on previous generations. I normally use my 18w charger, or my 7.5w Samsung wireless charging stand (for overnight)
We’ve already done the car analogy - it fails because virtually nobody has spare wheels and tires of the correct size, and they’re exceptionally expensive.An iPhone cannot be used without a charger. So it is a mandatory item, not a nice to have. An iPhone sold without a charger is not a complete product.
It is like selling a car without tyres, because your old car has tyres that you can use.
All electric devices that I own, come with a charger.
Exactly. Your existing Lighting cable and USBA brick will work just fine on an iphone12. Same for everyone else except those folks who literally possess just one single Lightning cable and power adapter and feel they must include them when selling on eBay or whatnot...They know their vast majority of iPhone users still have older iPhone with usb-a to lightning brick chargers
Noooo ...... that never happens here in the forums!Honestly, I think there's be people complaining regardless of which path Apple were to take...
No, there is a limit to what each device will accept. On top of that each power adapter has a particular set of voltage and amperage outputs, not all of which work with every device. It’s all in the fine print and adds even more complexity regarding which power adapter to get for what device. Welcome to the world of multiple standards in electronic devices. ENJOY!!!I don't need any more chargers thank you.
I have way too many: 29W Apple Macbook Retina, 61W Apple Macbook Pro, 81W Apple Macbook Pro, 100W Apple Macbook Pro 16".
Will the 100W charge 5 times faster than the 20 W ?![]()
Well because you are helping increase my Apple stock price, if you buy more stuff from Apple, that’s why. Thank youYour solution results in a lower selling price for my iPhone 11. Or course I can keep the adapter. Or buy a new one. Both "solutions" cost money.
Apple passed down a problem and some of you guys are eating it with a grin.
This is not about the cost of a $20 adapter. It's about greed. If it's so cheap, then why doesn't Apple include it? Or at least include a voucher? If I have an existing power adapter, why should I subsidize Apple from my existing collection of adapters?
Exactly. Your existing Lighting cable and USBA brick will work just fine on an iphone12. Same for everyone else except those folks who literally possess just one single Lightning cable and power adapter and feel they must include them when selling on eBay or whatnot...
I’ve not quite figured out the true point of MagSafe yet, but I‘be been using Qi changing for years - and the 12 will work with those pads just fine too.
To connect to your MacBook Pro? Existing USB-C adapter?Why include the cable at all with this logic?
We’ve already done the car analogy - it fails because virtually nobody has spare wheels and tires of the correct size, and they’re exceptionally expensive.
Contrast to an iphone12. Charges from anyone’s existing Lightning cables and power adapters. Charges from anyone’s existing Qi pads. Even my four year old pickup came with a Qi pad in it. Cars are coming with USBC ports now and have come with USBA for years.
Yet even with all that, there will be the random person who absolutely has no existing charging capability - and the solution is right down the street at your nearest store - and costs little. Or go on eBay or to OWC and buy OEM for low prices
I find it had to believe you truly own no electric devices that didn’t come with a power adapter. Tons of stuff comes without since USBA is so ubiquitous. Each year even more will come that way. GoPros, Garmin watches, Apple Watches, Bluetooth headphones including expensive ones (Aftershokz Aeropex).
Better buckle up, this is likely the start of a trend.
I am happy for you that you will like to enjoy weak old chargers instead of the latest Apple chargers. But new flagship phones have different ”wheel sizes“ as they can support more wattages.
The iPhone 11 Pro Max charger for example is much more powerful than the charger of older iPhones.
Old Lightning cables will also charge the new phones just fine, so perhaps it's just not a big deal to a lot of people.Read countless posts on here and Reddit from people defending Apple's potential move of not including the power adapter with the 2020 iPhones because they had plenty of them lying around at home already. And yet not a word from anyone now that we know the new iPhones will ship with a USB-C Lightning cable that is incompatible with all previously included iPhone power adapters (except iPhone 11 Pro and Max).
An iPhone cannot be used without a charger. So it is a mandatory item, not a nice to have. An iPhone sold without a charger is not a complete product.
It is like selling a car without tyres, because your old car has tyres that you can use.
All electric devices that I own, come with a charger.