Yes! The basic form and function has stayed the same for many years.
Usability is not poor, it is pure. It's an old-school photographic tool with high craftsmanship and beautiful design. I have many more "capable" cameras, and I reach for this one the majority of the time. To each their own.
This is the traditional bias on that one: it cost a lot so I love it. The shutter button is in the most horrible place and it's not designed around human hands at all but rather where the guts will fit without making the engineers think too hard. The output is indistinguishable from something 100x cheaper. I've had more and less capable cameras and an M6 (inherited) and quite frankly the economy models of the Eastern side of the originating country were preferable. Give me a crap Praktica MTL and a decent M42 lens, even if it's covered in fungus over that any day. Your twisted hands will forgive you for owning the Leica eventually. If you're going to spend today, there are better options from Japan.
It's the ponzi investment scam scheme of design: it's good because someone else said it is.
Edit: also no one will try and steal the Praktica off you in some former Soviet backwater (my favourite holiday destination) while you're snapping photos of Marx and Lenin because they will go "oh it's a Praktica - they are poor and stupid"
Above design submitted for approval in the thread. If someone does want to steal it, you can repurpose it as a melee weapon fairly quickly as it's like carrying a brick in a sock around.
The M6 I sold went for so much I went on holiday with the money and got to take photos of interesting things rather than eat noodles at home and take photos of the wall.
Last edited: