Cleverest thing Phone manufacturers have done is to convince people that glass and stainless steel are premium materials
Interesting. Maybe that is the reason but when I got the Aluminium AW 3, I thought it looked a bit classier than the stainless steel Samsung Gear S3 FrontierI have always preferred the mat finish of aluminum to the shiny look of stainless steel.
I agree. I just got my first apple watch Nike edition which only comes in aluminum And depending on what band i use, it can look sporty or classy. Plus it’s lighter than the stainless steel....um...and less expensive! ??Interesting. Maybe that is the reason but when I got the Aluminium AW 3, I thought it looked a bit classier than the stainless steel Samsung Gear S3 Frontier
You compare the price of aluminum to the price of steel. Then state the fact that the sides are made of stainless steel. Stainless steel is more expensive than steel. However, I agree that the polished stainless steel isn't practical. It looks nice, only if you don't touch it. And, it doesn't provide a nice grip.Firstly, aluminium is actually three times more expensive than steel, so it's ironic stainless steel is reserved for the premium models. Aluminium is also lighter, which as iPhones grow bigger and thicker would keep the weight down.
Perhaps Apple feel the shiny stainless steel looks more premium, but I've always been more impressed with the anodized aluminium sides on iPhones. The stainless steel wasn't too bad on the rounded corners on the X/XS/11 Pro but on the new flat edges it turns into a disaster within seconds of handling your phone. It completely subverts the premium image that Apple is aiming for.
I've seen a lot consumers wishing for matte sides on the Pro & Pro Max models. Even matte steel would be better but I'd still take aluminium out of the two.
Is there any chance that Apple will use aluminium sides on the iPhone 13 Pro & Pro Max models or we stuck with steel?
I'm so surprised folks have voted this way.
The coating on the stainless steel makes the phone durable too. You can scratch the anodized aluminum much easier than that PVC coating.
The stainless steel phones feel of super quality to me. The aluminum, cheaper. I don't have anything against the aluminum phones, I just find the stainless steel with PVC is the much more premium combination.
I think it shows that not everybody’s perception of aluminium is ‘cheap’. I certainly don’t hold my iPhone 12 and think it feels cheap that’s for sure.
I also wonder how many that voted have held both. I have a 12 mini and a 12 Pro Max so I can go back and forth and feel the difference.
It probably costs more to cut the steel, polish it to pretty flawless mirror finish, and the surface treat the metal for color and scratch resistance, than to cut and anodize the aluminum. The stainless is pretty nicely finished.Based on what?
Stainless Steel is stronger, less corrosive, less malleable, and while cost by weight aluminum is more expensive, cost by volume (the number that matters), steel is much more expensive.
not to mention part of something being premium is what society and culture dictate as premium, and the general consensus of society is that stainless steel is a more premium material than aluminum.
The iPhone 5c took a lot of grief here. But that was one solid phone, and looked new until I shattered the screen.I would much prefer aluminum over steel. Heck, I would prefer plastic over steel.
So do scratchesNo, I don't use cases actually. I hate the extra bulk they add and they make the phone look tacky.
I think the issue with the Stainless steel frame on the 12 Pro models, is more the look and appearance of the polished finish, which some people think looks a bit like shiny plastic, and by extension cheap looking. There is no question that Stainless Steel is a premium metal, very hard and durable, but Apple should have kept it Brushed / Matte like the Iphone 4 frame.I'm so surprised folks have voted this way.
The coating on the stainless steel makes the phone durable too. You can scratch the anodized aluminum much easier than that PVC coating.
The stainless steel phones feel of super quality to me. The aluminum, cheaper. I don't have anything against the aluminum phones, I just find the stainless steel with PVC is the much more premium combination.
The iPhone 5c took a lot of grief here. But that was one solid phone, and looked new until I shattered the screen.
Also, it was grippy. No case needed. But the stainless 12 pro is slippery like wet soap bars. Cant even put it in pockets without a case, as they slide out.
The weight isn’t a major issue for me, the lens choice/systems are. If the regular 6.1” had the same lenses I would have a lot more trouble choosing as screen size is also important to me and so much is wasted on Face ID phones. That said, the pro max is noticeably heavier in my pocket than the 6s+.Is it too heavy for you? The weight doesn’t really matter to me. It’s not like it’s a 10 lb phone. Just get the aluminum one