Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
This is wild from the perspective that Apple has invested something like $10-15 billion in R&D on Project Titan or whatever they were calling it, but it sounds like a lot that R&D can at least be redirected to their A.I. initiatives. The automobile business probably would have been an albatross for them.
 
The iPhone of EVs already exists: Tesla, and Tim Cook realized that. Whenever people say they want an EV, they actually mean a Tesla. This is why Ford, GM, Mercedes have all failed miserably in comparison. The only competition is with Chinese EV companies and that's only for their domestic market.
Tesla is the blackberry or Palm Pilot of EV's, not the iPhone. That has yet to appear.

Ford and GM I might give you, if it weren't so early in the game for them. Mercedes? You're out of your mind.
 
Glad to see this. The investment would have been untold billions of dollars for very little return. Not just the R&D but the manufacturing costs, the showrooms, and so on.

Rather see money go whole hog into AI and quantum computing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Morod
The iPhone of EVs already exists: Tesla, and Tim Cook realized that. Whenever people say they want an EV, they actually mean a Tesla. This is why Ford, GM, Mercedes have all failed miserably in comparison. The only competition is with Chinese EV companies and that's only for their domestic market.
None of them have good Apple ecosystem integration. Do you know what that means?

1. There is a market for Apple car
2. Apple could lose in other sectors if no cars integrate with their ecosystem
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
pikachu-shocked-face-stunned.gif
 
They are inefficient and don’t have good ranges before they need time consuming charges. And they aren’t green.
Not the time or place for a debate - but if you are talking about EVs in general - you may be right, but if you talk about Teslas - then you're dead wrong. But that's not an EV vs Gas car debate, it's just bad EVs vs Gas car debate. As a guy with 2 in the garage, driven 30k in road trips from Texas, California, to Tennessee - I would never drive a non-EV ever again.

  1. In the city, I get 300+ miles of range. I charge once a week because I drive 50m a day, and even for days I drive 150-200m in a day for visiting places around Colorado it's been great.
  2. On the highway, I drive for 3-4 hours, stop and get a drink/go to bathroom and I'm ready to go for the next 3-4 hours. I'm not 15 years old and can sit in a car for 8-10 hours without cramping. So this is perfect.
  3. Cold weather - I get heat in seconds compared to having to warm up a gas car for 20-30m and then get some heat. Norway (much colder than most of the US) is primarily Teslas.
  4. No maintenance except for tires and washer fluid. First set of tires was disappointing…replaced at 16k. Second set so far is good at 44k miles.
  5. Lower overall cost. I've said money on insurance, fuel, maintenance…etc. By thousands per car per year.
  6. Not really EVs…but Teslas: Most American made car made. Safest car. Tesla Model Y secures 2024 IIHS TOP SAFETY PICK+ award despite tougher metrics.
  7. I don't really care about the green part, but factually they are greener than ICE cars. Especially if you charge it at home on solar.
These are MY facts I can prove with all data I collect from own personal car for the last 2 years. 30,000 miles in road trips. 20,000 miles in local driving. Two Teslas I own. Both my adult sons got one.
 
Here's something I saw somewhere else and I think it's worth considering: Vision Pro by their own thinking and sales estimates is a niche device and will be for years. With the Car out, what is Apple's next growth driver? AI for iPhones will be a buoy I guess, but the smartphone market has settled into a steady plateau.
 
No one is going to do a true autonomous car that can fully replace human drivers any time soon. It's a fool's errand; there's just too many variables and differing conditions to account for. Even in a small, known environment like SanFran they couldn't get Waymos or robo-taxis to work well. It makes sense that Apple pursued this, and it makes sense they're getting out.
 
I think Apple took a peek over into the abyss that BYD has created, and which Tesla and the US "Big Three" are on the verge of falling into, and very adroitly decided that now was a good time to pivot. While I'm somewhat disappointed as an Apple customer, as an Apple shareholder it is my hope that the hundreds of patents they published with all of the car R&D will pay dividends for the company in the future.
 
I'd say the car is just an accessory to a phone in that regard, not the compute hub that everything revolves around.
Yes, and it’s an accessory almost everyone needs on a daily basis, which could process a lot more data and be more helpful compared to, I would argue an Apple Watch.

Now imagine Apple discontinuing Apple Watch.

I think this rumor, if true, is a MASSIVE strategic failure
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
No, they just need to improve – which they will. It's the pollution-spewing oil-burners that need to die. I love my BMW i4 M50.

Lol, BMW owners are the absolute worst. I’m sorry, I’ve never met a driver of one who isn’t a 9 or 10 on the narcissism scale.
 
  • Like
Reactions: AusMness
Sucks. was looking forward to apple coming into a market where the product is 1-1 with the consumers identity. So we don’t get a world where every car commercial is dedicated to **** talking apple. Imagine how desperate people would be to explain how their car isn’t an Apple car. Do it for the lols Apple, make a car
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Victor Mortimer
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.