You have no evidence there is no God.
That's not how it works, you can't prove a negative. Any claims of a god have to be proven, not disproven. There is nothing miserable about wanting evidence.
Last edited by a moderator:
You have no evidence there is no God.
Tim Cook's relationship with God is none of your business. He doesn't owe you a damned explanation.
Based on what I see in Scripture, God puts up with a lot of culturally ingrained behaviors: polygamy being one of them. He has never put up with homosexuality according to the Scriptures. There are many churches who try to do an end run around unchanging doctrines, like the Bible's teachings against homosexuality, fornication, and adultery, by playing the "times have changed" card. They do so at their eternal peril and those they influence to the same error. It is very sad to see so many churches lacking in doctrinal integrity.
Nope. Nope. NOPE. Straight people don't keep their personal lives personal. They hold hands in public. They put pictures of their spouse on their desk at work. They openly use opposite-sex pronouns when recounting their weekend activities around the water cooler at work. The put stick figures of their little hetero families on their minivans. That is called heterosexual privilege, when you can be who you are without fear of negative consequences.
So when all straight people agree to keep their personal lives personal, I, as a gay man, will do the same. But really...this kind of comment is TIRING. The world belongs to everyone. You have to share it with everyone, including gay people. And you don't get to quash or silence topics that make you uncomfortable.
God makes people new each day. I see people's lives transformed by it, mine included, all the time. Whether you wish to see it as me reading a self-help book called the Bible or God actually working some invisible process in me or some peculiar combination of the two is where faith, reason and evidence meet. I am struck, however, how many of our world's problems would vanish if we held to the Scripture's doctrines on human sexuality: one man, one woman, working things out in love, for life.
You have no evidence there is no God.
You can't prove a negative.
Judge not, that ye be not judged.
I believe that quote comes from the bible. Maybe you should try living by it for once. You might call yourself a Christian, but you're certainly not Christlike.
Judge not, that ye be not judged.
I believe that quote comes from the bible. Maybe you should try living by it for once. You might call yourself a Christian, but you're certainly not Christlike.
Hellen Keller saw this coming.
... and she's been dead for 46 years.
but if you follow every rule in the Old Testament, you wouldn't be able to eat at Red Lobster this weekend lest ye face the same result.![]()
Like with most people who spread hatred, including even atheists too at times, my standard response is, "Jesus hung out with the lepers & prostitutes, but he would probably not hang out with you."
Jesus didn't specifically call out homosexuality in his recorded sermons. This is not in dispute. He did, however, uphold the entirety of the Old Testament (that whole, not one stroke shall pass thing ... see below for the qualifier).Everyone always says that Jesus preached against homosexuality, but when pressed, they can never seem to pull out a New Testament quote from the 4 Gospels of Jesus's life.
Why? BECAUSE THERE AREN'T ANY!
Actually, you'll be hard pressed to find any mention of the OT promising eternal damnation (the Saducees didn't believe in an afterlife in fact ... and they were the leading group of Jews at Jesus's day). But Jesus fulfilled the ceremonial side of the law. After his sacrifice, there was nothing else that needed to be done in terms of ceremony. Besides which, the tired jibe of not eating shellfish applied only to Jews.However, there are plenty of mentions of homosexuality in the Old Testament promising death and eternal damnation, but if you follow every rule in the Old Testament, you wouldn't be able to eat at Red Lobster this weekend lest ye face the same result.![]()
I'm inclined to agree that it would be preferable for the CEO of Apple to keep his public persona all about Apple. It's unfortunate that anyone feels it necessary to make a statement about their sexuality. Should not be necessary but there still is a great deal of intolerance. That's too bad.
I hope that now that Cook has made his statement his concentration is on products not social issues.
Steve was a very private person. He has been harshly criticized for that. I think Steve got it all right. Make great products and keep the focus on Apple not any particular individual.
I have not read much of this thread. It is not my intent to step on toes or make waves. I hope everyone with a clock running at Apple keeps their minds on business.
Thanks for reading.
The fact that you know his name and that you expect us to know his name and that you call him by his first name, and that you assign your own beliefs to him shows that "Steve" was not successful when it came to keeping the focus on Apple and not on any particular individual (if indeed that was his aim). Even years after he is gone you hold him up like some deity.Steve was a very private person. He has been harshly criticized for that. I think Steve got it all right. Make great products and keep the focus on Apple not any particular individual.
I'm a convinced atheist