Did you read Apple's last quarter results? Desktops sales have fallen off a cliff.
My point is that Steve made that prediction in 2007. Apple has since put more effort into flogging notebooks cos that's where their market is. It's been a self-fulfilling prophesy.
Your first statement says that you don't really need a new computer, but your second statement says you do.
If you actually "urgently need" to replace your desktop, then you would do it. Professionals typically don't worry about what's coming - they buy a Mac Pro (or PowerMac), use it until it's not useful any more, and then buy a new one. Why? Because time is money, and buying what's available now will pay for itself, far better than playing the waiting game.
It's about time for a 40" screen. This 30" screen is just too small.
Yes, I'm the only person who wants a headless mac (under $2500) or a blu-ray drive.
--t
This scares me, because it comes with no warning. I want to get two of the current 30's to replace my two 23" ACDs I have now, and I want to do it before they possibly move the whole line to the glossy 24" style.
Did you read Apple's last quarter results? Desktop sales have fallen off a cliff.
My point is that Steve made that prediction in 2007. Apple has since put more effort into flogging notebooks cos that's where their market is. It's been a self-fulfilling prophesy.
![]()
I think I'll wait for the new Apple 6 foot wide iDesk to come out. I hear it's ultra thin and made Green by using recycled newspaper and will be aggressively priced and retail for just $5,000!![]()
Reading the article again, it seems the one analyst who apparently believes this was being paraphrased instead of quoted, so in reality it's difficult to know if that's precisely what he meant. The only thing I can say for certain is that he believes this isn't a good time for Apple to be making a major commitment to new products, not that he necessarily thinks they won't do it anyway.
Uh..you can buy a single processor Mac Pro for $2299 retail. I think that's under $2500, isn't it? Student price is $2,149.
So you agree with the analyst that Apple will wait until 2010 to update the Mac mini?
arn
I'll make that... eerrrhhmmm.... marketing crap.
Unless Apple stop making iMacs... and Mac Pro's. With just the Mac mini as a desktop Mac, then.. yeah.... then notebooks will be 80-90% of what they sell. Less units overall, of course...![]()
Yes, I did.
My point is that Apple's notebook line-up is more attractive than the desktop line-up, and that will certainly result in falling desktop sales compared to notebook sales, or (looked at positively) rising comparatively notebook sales.
Indeed, that's your self-fulfilling prophesy.
But, I am sure that notebooks will not be the real desktop replacement, at least not for most. I sure hope Steve doesn't believe too much in his own "prophecy".)
Holy crap. I never saw that line from Dell (need to go there more often). I think I am in love
It's about time for a 40" screen. This 30" screen is just too small.
So you agree with the analyst that Apple will wait until 2010 to update the Mac mini?
arn
Did you read Apple's last quarter results? Desktop sales have fallen off a cliff.
My point is that Steve made that prediction in 2007. Apple has since put more effort into flogging notebooks cos that's where their market is. It's been a self-fulfilling prophesy.
![]()
I smell an iMacMiniPro with built in LED screen.
Something first posted here by some newbie.
Something first posted here by some newbie.
Apple is becoming increasingly erratic in launch schedules, so anythings possible
When two of your desktops are laptops crammed into small spaces with one being close to two years out of date and never having a real solid update cycle sense its release and the third is a $2300. People aren't going to buy ultra-expensive or non-competitive products. If you're going to get mobile performance might as well buy the mobile version.
I thought it'd been shown that the latest iMacs are not using notebook parts. Mac mini, yes, absolutely.