My argument must have a grain of truth to it, rather than the logical fallacy you concluded with. Apple didn't get to $1T by being the best of worst. They are selling product and services.
If you believe Apple is polarizing and making annoying decisions, you are entitled to your opinion.
I respond with Apple is making more correct decisions than incorrect decisions because it is doing well.
At any case, Apple for the longest time has only included the bare necessities in the box. Would I like to have more than less, sure. But they are not the only ones doing it. As I mentioned, Samsung is doing that with their TVs also, irrespective of where you believe the price on the food chain is. I can't defend what apple is doing any more than Samsung, but I'm not losing any sleep over it.
This entire notion about who is being pissed off is a red-herring. There is no way of knowing what the 70 million customers that bought iphones, macs, airpods, homepods, apple tvs etc are thinking. You only know about the small microcosm posted on the internet claiming they are pissed. After that you are only guessing, which goes back to how apple is doing. If you want to think of it that apple is pissing off less than they are pleasing, it's the same as apple is doing more right than wrong.
Any which way, the saying holds: that you can fool some of the people some of the time, but you can't fool all of the people all of the time. Maybe apple isn't fooling anybody and that's why people are buying their products and they ended up at $1T.