It’s not an optical zoom, it’s just a feature that allows you to take pictures of things that are far away so that they appear closer. You know, like an optical zoom lens does.
Ugh.Agreed. I used it back on the 21 ultra and even then it was stable. The Samsung watches can also measure blood pressure and the Apple watch can't seem to do that. Waited all these years for better zoom on the iphone and still not close to Samsung.
The gains in zoom by Apple have been pitiful. We had 2 x on the iphone 7 in 2016. Then had to wait until another 4 years to get to 2.5 x zoom. Then the following year got a measly 3x when Samsung already had 10X by that point. Now 5 X two years later.
Thanks, enlightening to say the least.I'd say that's because you get more if you pay more.![]()
I think the galaxy is using a 10 megapixel sensor, so you may be rightThough optically different in terms of depth of field, with those specs and features it is likely the 5x zoomed in 2x in post will look superior to the 10x from the galaxy.
Very few actual photography "enthusiasts" have abandoned a dedicated camera for a smart phone. Point and shoot users are not enthusiasts.Lots of camera enthusiasts have abandoned their dedicated cameras over the last several years because smartphone cameras provide good enough results for the most common use cases, along with incredible portability and ease of use. Not to mention the fact that the phone is always with you, including times and places where you wouldn’t dream of lugging big and heavy photo gear.
Not if you come from an iPhone SE 1st gen, it isn't!Yes, I agree — this year's model is a big disappointment(imho). Especially if you don't want the Max model. I've never been happier skipping a model than this year.
Yeah, I'm well aware of the photographers triangle.Using a faster shutter speed requires a wider aperture, higher ISO, or more light. Apple is already pushing the technological and physical boundaries on all of the above.
Isn't it?Thanks, enlightening to say the least.
Didn't I add imho in there? Clearly a point of view.Not if you come from an iPhone SE 1st gen, it isn't!
Points of view, my friend, points of view.
No, not at all. But I'm sure your facial expression matches your avatar right now, as does mine.Isn't it?![]()
The manufacturer of the lens is struggling to provide the volume, I read somewhereDoubtful — it seems like they really dropped the ball with this year's model, so much that couldn't add the 5x zoom to the Pro model... I, personally, don't care as I moved up to the Pro Max model, but it's just an ****** thing to do imho — the Pro Max is bigger than some people want to hold/carry.
Google has a LOT of flexibility with which parts they use. In total, they’ve sold around 30 million Pixel phones since their introduction. So, in any given year, they only have to have suppliers deliver 4-5 million parts for them to build their phones. Apple will ship 30 million iPhone 15’s before the new year. That drastically limits the technology that can possibly be in an iPhone.I think they have dropped the ball on it, if Samsung can put a 10x into their phone I’m sure Apple can. Google will be holding an event on the 4th October, I’m guessing they will even beat Apple to it. It’s like Apple don’t see competition, only themselves. This is coming from an Apple fan, I just think Apple need to do more.
I don't know why they can't stick to their own ideas. Samsung do this all the time. Have a good idea and then dumb it down to follow Apple. They will end up bringing it back at some point. This has been happening for years. They had a 12 inch tablet back in 2014. Scrapped it then saw Apple doing the larger pros and brought it back. There are so many examples. I would even argue that the S view cases were a spiritual pre-cursor to the dynamic island.I do not have shaky hands, and the S23 Ultra 10x Zoom works great. With that said, Samsung is getting rid of 10x too, so that sucks.
I'm sure, I don't appreciate dropping a half-assed best iPhone ever.The manufacturer of the lens is struggling to provide the volume, I read somewhere
Or USB-C or the action button.Yeah, just kind Always On Display... Oh wait
Sounds like a use case for the cameras on iPads to me!Also, unless you want to carry a phone the size of a cafeteria tray around
Nope, my post was one of sarcasm and mockery of the futile nature of engineers trying to rationalize the manifesto of technologies progress.Do you find it so surprising? Technology evolves, stuff gets cheaper, supply improves. So maybe something is not worth it this year, but it is the next one.
I would rather have 3x and 10x ....From a practicality standpoint I’d rather have fixed 5x than fixed 10x. If I were a betting man, I’d put money them switching to a 48mp sensor and keeping the existing tetraprism, which would give the option to go up from 5 to 10x without sacrificing too much on image quality.
I can do this with google photos via software.Yes, I know — there are many of these questions. I also wonder if the whole "take any photo as a portrait photo later" really is a hardware limitation.
Did not know this. But that just proves my point...I can do this with google photos via software.
This is a photo taken by a dedicated camera with a crop factor of 5.58. This means that the equivalent aperture is approximately f44. And is taken with a much smaller sensor than the one on the iPhone. So big aperture doesn’t mean uninteresting images. It is just limited the zoom range on the iPhone. But the existing telephoto lens of 5X is bright enough.According to Tony Northrup the full-frame equivalent is about f/21. Who would buy a 120mm lens at f/21?
Much a do about nothing, it has it's pros & cons, most users use it once or twice a year and that includes myself.
In an interview with Numerama's Nicolas Lellouche, Apple's VP of camera software engineering Jon McCormack explained why the iPhone 15 Pro Max's tetraprism lens system is limited to 5x optical zoom, instead of 10x like on Samsung's Galaxy S23 Ultra. The interview is in French, so quotes below are computer translated.
![]()
Apple says the Telephoto lens on the iPhone 15 Pro Max features the company's most advanced camera stabilization system yet, with a combination of optical image stabilization and an autofocus 3D sensor-shift module. McCormack said the iPhone's 5x zoom lens can be stabilized "incredibly well" compared to a 10x lens.
"The 5x zoom is something that we can stabilize incredibly well," McCormack said in the interview. "If you look at the 10x zoom, unless you have the steadiest hands in the world or a tripod, it's really difficult to use."
Apple's senior director of iPhone product marketing Maxime Veron, who was also interviewed, added that the iPhone 15 Pro Max's 5x lens opens at ƒ/2.8, allowing for "excellent light management." By comparison, the Galaxy S23 Ultra's 10x lens has a ƒ/4.9 aperture. A lower aperture allows for more light to be captured by the camera's sensor, which can be especially beneficial for Night mode photos.
5x optical zoom is exclusive to the iPhone 15 Pro Max, with the iPhone 15 Pro remaining limited to 3x optical zoom. It has been rumored that Apple plans to expand the tetraprism lens system to both iPhone 16 Pro models next year.
McCormack and Veron discuss the latest camera innovations on all iPhone 15 models in more detail in the Numerama interview. The devices launch Friday.
Article Link: Apple Explains Why iPhone 15 Pro Max is Limited to 5x Optical Zoom
Samsung actually offer 3x and 10x so you can use it in different scenarios.Ugh.
When it comes to camera focal lengths, bigger number ≠ better. Bigger number = different. There are trade-offs. My phone has a “5x” lens. For photos of people, I think I’d be better off with a lens in the 2x to 3x range. For wildlife, sure, a longer zoom may be better.
As an 'enthusiast' photographer and I absolutely use my phone more and more. My dslr and mirrorless are better in some situations, but I'm routinely surprised how great of pictures I can get from my iPhone. I'm worried about taking great pictures regardless of the equipment I have with me at the time.Very few actual photography "enthusiasts" have abandoned a dedicated camera for a smart phone. Point and shoot users are not enthusiasts.
Go to any dedicated photography forum, either online or in real life, and make that suggestion and be laughed out of the room. I realize we are on an Apple forum here so there is bias in pretending cellphones replace a dedicated full frame or crop frame camera, but you're way off base. Dedicated camera sales are growing, not shrinking. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1172711/forecast-of-digital-camera-sales-volume/
I don't think he's being sensationalist. He points out that in the marketing Apple described the focal length in full frame equivalents but didn't described the aperture in full frame equivalents. That is misleading. Clever, but misleading.I watched some of that video. It was weird how he showed a clip from a previous video showing him praising the Samsung for how much better its telephoto images are than the iPhone 14 Pro, only to then complain about the lens configuration on the 15 Pro, which is a closer match to the Samsung.
He has some good points about how misleading Apple is when marketing their camera capabilities, but he’s being sensationalist.