Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It’s not an optical zoom, it’s just a feature that allows you to take pictures of things that are far away so that they appear closer. You know, like an optical zoom lens does.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Digitalweddings
Agreed. I used it back on the 21 ultra and even then it was stable. The Samsung watches can also measure blood pressure and the Apple watch can't seem to do that. Waited all these years for better zoom on the iphone and still not close to Samsung.

The gains in zoom by Apple have been pitiful. We had 2 x on the iphone 7 in 2016. Then had to wait until another 4 years to get to 2.5 x zoom. Then the following year got a measly 3x when Samsung already had 10X by that point. Now 5 X two years later.
Ugh.

When it comes to camera focal lengths, bigger number ≠ better. Bigger number = different. There are trade-offs. My phone has a “5x” lens. For photos of people, I think I’d be better off with a lens in the 2x to 3x range. For wildlife, sure, a longer zoom may be better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4odomi
Lots of camera enthusiasts have abandoned their dedicated cameras over the last several years because smartphone cameras provide good enough results for the most common use cases, along with incredible portability and ease of use. Not to mention the fact that the phone is always with you, including times and places where you wouldn’t dream of lugging big and heavy photo gear.
Very few actual photography "enthusiasts" have abandoned a dedicated camera for a smart phone. Point and shoot users are not enthusiasts.

Go to any dedicated photography forum, either online or in real life, and make that suggestion and be laughed out of the room. I realize we are on an Apple forum here so there is bias in pretending cellphones replace a dedicated full frame or crop frame camera, but you're way off base. Dedicated camera sales are growing, not shrinking. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1172711/forecast-of-digital-camera-sales-volume/
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4odomi
Yes, I agree — this year's model is a big disappointment(imho). Especially if you don't want the Max model. I've never been happier skipping a model than this year.
Not if you come from an iPhone SE 1st gen, it isn't!
Points of view, my friend, points of view.
 
Doubtful — it seems like they really dropped the ball with this year's model, so much that couldn't add the 5x zoom to the Pro model... I, personally, don't care as I moved up to the Pro Max model, but it's just an ****** thing to do imho — the Pro Max is bigger than some people want to hold/carry.
The manufacturer of the lens is struggling to provide the volume, I read somewhere
 
I think they have dropped the ball on it, if Samsung can put a 10x into their phone I’m sure Apple can. Google will be holding an event on the 4th October, I’m guessing they will even beat Apple to it. It’s like Apple don’t see competition, only themselves. This is coming from an Apple fan, I just think Apple need to do more.
Google has a LOT of flexibility with which parts they use. In total, they’ve sold around 30 million Pixel phones since their introduction. So, in any given year, they only have to have suppliers deliver 4-5 million parts for them to build their phones. Apple will ship 30 million iPhone 15’s before the new year. That drastically limits the technology that can possibly be in an iPhone.
 
I do not have shaky hands, and the S23 Ultra 10x Zoom works great. With that said, Samsung is getting rid of 10x too, so that sucks.
I don't know why they can't stick to their own ideas. Samsung do this all the time. Have a good idea and then dumb it down to follow Apple. They will end up bringing it back at some point. This has been happening for years. They had a 12 inch tablet back in 2014. Scrapped it then saw Apple doing the larger pros and brought it back. There are so many examples. I would even argue that the S view cases were a spiritual pre-cursor to the dynamic island.
 
Do you find it so surprising? Technology evolves, stuff gets cheaper, supply improves. So maybe something is not worth it this year, but it is the next one.
Nope, my post was one of sarcasm and mockery of the futile nature of engineers trying to rationalize the manifesto of technologies progress.
 
From a practicality standpoint I’d rather have fixed 5x than fixed 10x. If I were a betting man, I’d put money them switching to a 48mp sensor and keeping the existing tetraprism, which would give the option to go up from 5 to 10x without sacrificing too much on image quality.
I would rather have 3x and 10x ....
 
According to Tony Northrup the full-frame equivalent is about f/21. Who would buy a 120mm lens at f/21?
This is a photo taken by a dedicated camera with a crop factor of 5.58. This means that the equivalent aperture is approximately f44. And is taken with a much smaller sensor than the one on the iPhone. So big aperture doesn’t mean uninteresting images. It is just limited the zoom range on the iPhone. But the existing telephoto lens of 5X is bright enough.
DSCN2597.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: Poppleropples


In an interview with Numerama's Nicolas Lellouche, Apple's VP of camera software engineering Jon McCormack explained why the iPhone 15 Pro Max's tetraprism lens system is limited to 5x optical zoom, instead of 10x like on Samsung's Galaxy S23 Ultra. The interview is in French, so quotes below are computer translated.

iPhone-15-Pro-Max-5x-Optical-Zoom-Limit-Feature-1.jpg

Apple says the Telephoto lens on the iPhone 15 Pro Max features the company's most advanced camera stabilization system yet, with a combination of optical image stabilization and an autofocus 3D sensor-shift module. McCormack said the iPhone's 5x zoom lens can be stabilized "incredibly well" compared to a 10x lens.

"The 5x zoom is something that we can stabilize incredibly well," McCormack said in the interview. "If you look at the 10x zoom, unless you have the steadiest hands in the world or a tripod, it's really difficult to use."

Apple's senior director of iPhone product marketing Maxime Veron, who was also interviewed, added that the iPhone 15 Pro Max's 5x lens opens at ƒ/2.8, allowing for "excellent light management." By comparison, the Galaxy S23 Ultra's 10x lens has a ƒ/4.9 aperture. A lower aperture allows for more light to be captured by the camera's sensor, which can be especially beneficial for Night mode photos.

5x optical zoom is exclusive to the iPhone 15 Pro Max, with the iPhone 15 Pro remaining limited to 3x optical zoom. It has been rumored that Apple plans to expand the tetraprism lens system to both iPhone 16 Pro models next year.

McCormack and Veron discuss the latest camera innovations on all iPhone 15 models in more detail in the Numerama interview. The devices launch Friday.

Article Link: Apple Explains Why iPhone 15 Pro Max is Limited to 5x Optical Zoom
Much a do about nothing, it has it's pros & cons, most users use it once or twice a year and that includes myself.
I had almost convinced myself to upgrade, but early reviews show photos in various scenarios can be a hit or miss and the flares in low light are still very present, what's even more concerning, battery life seems to be worse than on 14 Pro's.
I'm holding off until we get some proper reviews
 
Ugh.

When it comes to camera focal lengths, bigger number ≠ better. Bigger number = different. There are trade-offs. My phone has a “5x” lens. For photos of people, I think I’d be better off with a lens in the 2x to 3x range. For wildlife, sure, a longer zoom may be better.
Samsung actually offer 3x and 10x so you can use it in different scenarios.
 
Very few actual photography "enthusiasts" have abandoned a dedicated camera for a smart phone. Point and shoot users are not enthusiasts.

Go to any dedicated photography forum, either online or in real life, and make that suggestion and be laughed out of the room. I realize we are on an Apple forum here so there is bias in pretending cellphones replace a dedicated full frame or crop frame camera, but you're way off base. Dedicated camera sales are growing, not shrinking. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1172711/forecast-of-digital-camera-sales-volume/
As an 'enthusiast' photographer and I absolutely use my phone more and more. My dslr and mirrorless are better in some situations, but I'm routinely surprised how great of pictures I can get from my iPhone. I'm worried about taking great pictures regardless of the equipment I have with me at the time.

BTW, the statistics linked show some interesting things. One, there are almost as many iPhones sold in 2 quarters than there are stand alone cameras all year. Second, the average price of < $200 and the largest brand as 'other' tells me the volume is not from what people would consider pro-cameras.
 
I watched some of that video. It was weird how he showed a clip from a previous video showing him praising the Samsung for how much better its telephoto images are than the iPhone 14 Pro, only to then complain about the lens configuration on the 15 Pro, which is a closer match to the Samsung.

He has some good points about how misleading Apple is when marketing their camera capabilities, but he’s being sensationalist.
I don't think he's being sensationalist. He points out that in the marketing Apple described the focal length in full frame equivalents but didn't described the aperture in full frame equivalents. That is misleading. Clever, but misleading.

There's just three lenses on the 15 Pro max (you can see them), and the gap between 24mm and 120mm is where many people would want to shoot, but anything shot in that big gap (of nearly 100mm of focal length), like for instance shooting around 80-100mm, is a digital crop and underperforming. The 15 Pro is better in that regard because it's a narrower distance between 24mm and 77mm.

Basically it's best to stick to the actual focal length of any of the three lenses and ignore anything in between. And my guess is that most people shoot at around 77mm and not around 120mm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4odomi
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.