So with the 11” Pro (£769 base) vs iPad Air (£579), what does an extra £190 get you.
-Slightly larger screen
-Face ID
-Quad Speakers (not Dual)
-120Hz Promotion Display
-Double the storage
-Better cameras
-Better microphones
-Thinner device
-Brighter screen
-LiDAR
-Probably similar chip performance A14/A12Z (the A12Z will likely be better for multi-tasking)
Anyone who has the 11” Pro right now, just think you have enjoyed that device for however long you have had it already, and everything is better about it over the new air except that the air will perform a bit better at doing single tasks, but your pro will perform a lot better at multitasking.
IMO, the extra £190 currently for the PRO vs the AIR is still worth it, and a refurb 2018 pro will bring you even better value over the current AIR...
PLUS, let’s be honest here, not many people who purchase the AIR at £579 are going to splash out over half of that on the magic keyboard and get the full experience of their iPad.
Correct. Thanks.
Can we confirm the pros are thinner?
I got the impression by visual only on the event.
The new Air does looks thicker.
Pro is indeed slightly thinnerCan we confirm the pros are thinner?
I got the impression by visual only on the event.
The new Air does looks thicker.
Pro is indeed slightly thinner
View attachment 953765
I am pi**ed off! Apple just introduced Apple Air that is more powerful than my iPad Pro 2020. Really cannot understand this. They should include Bionic A14 is iPad Pro. What are your thoughts?
Multi-core makes a big difference in all sorts of things including just surfing. The single-core-is-all-that-is-important thing hasn't been true for a very, very long time now.Single core is pretty much all that matters on an iPad. What apps or use cases actually take advantage of multiple cores? Does anyone have a list or examples of usage models where it would matter that much? Maybe recording audio tracks or editing images... and what else?
Single core is pretty much all that matters on an iPad. What apps or use cases actually take advantage of multiple cores? Does anyone have a list or examples of usage models where it would matter that much? Maybe recording audio tracks or editing images... and what else?
Multi-core makes a big difference in all sorts of things including just surfing. The single-core-is-all-that-is-important thing hasn't been true for a very, very long time now.
Yeah that‘s one I’d expect to benefit.Video editing on LumaFusion?
Indeed. Plus video. Plus background tabs/apps are separate processes too.maybe it uses parallel threads to gather resources (images, links, etc) when a page initially loads
It's definitely what people will notice the most, being the biggest CPU factor in general system fluidity. The A14 will have other benefits from upgraded components like the ISP and neural network too. With chips already being overkill for iPad OS I don't know how much of a practical difference it will make though, OTOH the higher TDP of the A12Z will help a lot with sustained performance for heavier workloads, alongside the extra cores.Single core is pretty much all that matters on an iPad. What apps or use cases actually take advantage of multiple cores? Does anyone have a list or examples of usage models where it would matter that much? Maybe recording audio tracks or editing images... and what else?
Multi-core makes a difference up to a point. It's not like the A14 is a single-core chip. At 6 (2+4) vs 8 (4+4) cores, I expect we're entering diminishing returns territory.Multi-core makes a big difference in all sorts of things including just surfing. The single-core-is-all-that-is-important thing hasn't been true for a very, very long time now.
OTOH, 5nm might help with that, too.OTOH the higher TDP of the A12Z will help a lot with sustained performance for heavier workloads, alongside the extra cores.
The various iPhones and iPads have different sized updates. My A10X iPad Pro actually took longer than my wife's A10 iPad. I note that the update on the iPad Pro was much larger.I know it's apples to oranges but... to make a point...
I started iOS update on my iPhone 11 Pro Max before I started the update on my iPad Pro 11 (2018). My iPad Pro 11 finished the update WAY before my iPhone did. ... Way... way before - and they both downloaded the update at the same time.
The iPhones and iPads have differently sized updates.
Yup, I think TSMC claimed a 30% reduction in power draw for 5nm over 7nm. I'm looking forward to some more in depth analysis, and particularly to see what [insane performance/watt] the Mac chips bring to the tableOTOH, 5nm might help with that, too.
1100 vs 1600 ~= 45% increaseI'm very glad that they made the air as powerful as they could make it, but I feel the frustration of iPad 2020 owners
The a14 has a single core speed of around 1600 versus about 1100 for the pros. That will definitely be noticeable in certain scenarios. Multicore is about 600 points faster for the pros however.
So would it be reasonable to assume that for most operations, the A14 CPU gets the win?1100 vs 1600 ~= 45% increase
4600 vs 4000 ~= 13% decrease
Honestly, I doubt most people will notice a 10-15% difference. A14 likely uses less power, too, while delivering similar or better performance (not counting the GPU at least).
Probably yes if you can actually notice the difference.So would it be reasonable to assume that for most operations, the A14 CPU gets the win?
The crazy part about this whole thing is that the A14 could have been a lot more powerful if Apple wanted. They used a significant portion of the die realestate for a 2x faster neural engine. Not sure IOS even uses that chip very much other than for photo/video editing software? Not sure really where they will go with this.
The 5nm process is a huge deal it seams.