Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
It's an interesting debate that will never have a definitive answer. There's no reason why it can't be discussed ad nauseum by people who have opposing views. There is new evidence that supports Apple's interest in selling new phones by slowing down old ones.

And Apple does not optimize for older devices: iPhone 4 with iOS 7. Discuss.
[doublepost=1512967728][/doublepost]
Thank you for your minimal contribution to the conversation :rolleyes:
iOS 7? Is that even worth discussing 4 years out from its release?
 
If the battery is not under their perimeters for replacement even if you pay out of warranty they will not replace it.

Ridiculous.

And it makes this whole thing even worse. Your battery gets worn out, they slow down your phone and then they won't even let you pay to replace the battery? All signs are pointing towards a really shady practice.
 
Some data to make the thread rolling: my iPhone 6 has way over 1000 cycles and battery at around 90% of its original capacity. I tested it yesterday and the clock speed is 1127 MHz. According to Geekbench the A8 in iPhone 6 should be at 1400 MHz.

So I did a Geekbench test. The result is awful - multi-core score is 2281. In March this year it was 2501. It’s almost 10% drop. My phone now has the same result as iPod Touch which is clocked at 1,1 GHz.

In conclusion- there is something about that. I’m not judging if Apple did that on purpose. But I’d like some explanation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Applejuiced
Both my old iPhone 6 and my iPhone 6S have also been slowed down.

I remember having issues with them shutting down around 30% sometimes.

My 6S still had warranty when the IOS update to fix the problem was released but I did not take it to the Genius Bar because the problem was supposedly fixed.

Now I find out this problem was only covered up by reducing my iPhones speed? I specifically bought the 6S for the faster processor.

Edit:
Only my 6S is affected, the 6 is reporting normal speeds. My mistake.
 
Last edited:
Some data to make the thread rolling: my iPhone 6 has way over 1000 cycles and battery at around 90% of its original capacity. I tested it yesterday and the clock speed is 1127 MHz. According to Geekbench the A8 in iPhone 6 should be at 1400 MHz.

So I did a Geekbench test. The result is awful - multi-core score is 2281. In March this year it was 2501. It’s almost 10% drop. My phone now has the same result as iPod Touch which is clocked at 1,1 GHz.

In conclusion- there is something about that. I’m not judging if Apple did that on purpose. But I’d like some explanation.

Keep the receipts coming! I wonder how long it will take for Apple to respond to this.
 
I just read that even iPhones 7s are affected.

I just bought an iPhone X, how long before this also becomes slowed down?

My confidence in these phones is shattered.
 
I just read that even iPhones 7s are affected.

I just bought an iPhone X, how long before this also becomes slowed down?

My confidence in these phones is shattered.

Likely in about a year or two, depending on your battery usage. Hopefully by then, Apple will make it a thing you can toggle off in the iPhone settings.
 
Apparently it's been a "feature" since 10.2.1

There are hundreds of users reporting underclocked processors on their iPhone based on high batter wear level.

While Apple might say they've done this to prolong battery life, it's questionable at best. One could say it's a sneaky way to slow down older devices every 2 years in order to push people into upgrading their iPhones.
[doublepost=1512928173][/doublepost]

It's kind of real.

Considering Apple doesn't notify their users that their iPhones have been significantly slowed down due to batter wear level, most people just assume their phones are too old for the new iOS and go for an upgrade.

If Apple was transparent about this feature, I'm sure more people would replace their batteries and continue using their old device at full speed (which they had when they bought the phone).

Ha ha ha.... hilarious!!!! Can you show me hard facts? Even the article is wishy-washy.
 
Ha ha ha.... hilarious!!!! Can you show me hard facts? Even the article is wishy-washy.

What do you mean? Just try using Geekbenach on an older device and you can see it is much slower.
I tried Geekbenach on my iPhone 6S and its score is much lower than it should be. It was also effected with the 30% shutdown bug before the iOS 10.2.1 update.
 
For those using CPU DasherX. I would open and close the app a few times to check your cpu speed. It reports the speed at the time not the max speed. Either that or my iPhone X is wonky as when i last looked it was showing it as 2064mhz and i'm not in LPM.

c5fefd03b2476ff93b2dad7ae3344ff6.jpg


After closing and opening the app again

3b63b909871b224ea7f64a4f81871fdc.jpg


With LPM

3ab0daae05b32b809cf95e4183560572.jpg
 
Here is my Geekbench at 100%(bottom) and 43% top. iPhone 7. This is proof that Apple limits cpu based on battery level.
[doublepost=1512991555][/doublepost]This is not only battery wear level but also when battery % drops below a certain level!
[doublepost=1512991890][/doublepost]I also believe I discovered this last week but didn’t realise it was related to battery.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/11-2-throttling-cpu.2092487/
 

Attachments

  • 47CD47C8-EEF1-4E7E-9A3D-DB114E1EF745.png
    47CD47C8-EEF1-4E7E-9A3D-DB114E1EF745.png
    225 KB · Views: 170
  • B16E8380-8A61-46FA-BC37-A0ECCAFB1515.jpeg
    B16E8380-8A61-46FA-BC37-A0ECCAFB1515.jpeg
    107.6 KB · Views: 183
  • Like
Reactions: Applejuiced
Here is my Geekbench at 100%(bottom) and 43% top. iPhone 7. This is proof that Apple limits cpu based on battery level.
[doublepost=1512991555][/doublepost]This is not only battery wear level but also when battery % drops below a certain level!
[doublepost=1512991890][/doublepost]I also believe I discovered this last week but didn’t realise it was related to battery.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/11-2-throttling-cpu.2092487/

Would be interesting to see if this only happens on older iPhone 7s with a worn battery or also on brand new models.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BigMcGuire
It happens, there is the proof above. I think when battery drops below 50% then the cpu is throttled. It shouldn’t do this and Apple needs to sort it! Sneaky sods!
[doublepost=1512993139][/doublepost]Would be good if other people could post Geekbench scores at different battery levels.
 
More reports:

Hello everyone! I just read a post from u/TeckFire and the experience he had with his iPhone 6S after replacing the battery.

I currently have an iPhone 6 Plus and I was having major battery and performance issues that made it unusable (it was shutting off when the battery charge reached 40-30%) and the battery had aproximately 1034 cycles before it was replaced (according to CoconutBattery).

After a friend suggested that he noticed an important performance improvement when he replaced the battery, I decided to try it as well. I took my iPhone 6 Plus to a third party repair shop and took screenshots before & after the battery was replaced: Imgur screenshots.

As you can see in the screenshots, the CPU frequency before the battery was replaced was 836 Mhz and then 1400 Mhz after the replacement.

According to the Geekbench scores, the results show that my single-core performance increased from 1350 to 1579, and the multi-core performance from 2253 to 2678. In both tests I didn't have any other apps running.

I currently have to rely on third party shops to get some Apple devices repaired as we don't have warranty coverage or support here in Costa Rica, but if you live in a place where Apple is officially available, I'd suggest you to take it there as they provide better warranty and support.

source: https://www.reddit.com/r/iphone/comments/7iz2sg/iphone_6_plus_perfomance_improvement_after/
 
Here is my Geekbench at 100%(bottom) and 43% top. iPhone 7. This is proof that Apple limits cpu based on battery level.
[doublepost=1512991555][/doublepost]This is not only battery wear level but also when battery % drops below a certain level!
[doublepost=1512991890][/doublepost]I also believe I discovered this last week but didn’t realise it was related to battery.
https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/11-2-throttling-cpu.2092487/

By "battery level," do you mean charge level, or the battery's actual capacity (i.e., wear)?
[doublepost=1512994481][/doublepost]
Tried below 30%?

I just asked Chillip whether he's referring to charge state or charge capacity. I need to reread this thread, but I thought we were talking about battery capacity rather than battery charge state (level).
 
Battery charge state for me as in battery percentage. Wear level may also have an effect.
 
Wow, you're joking right?
It's not about battery life. Did you even read any of the thread?
So you would enjoy for Apple to slow down your iPhones processor performance by more than 50%?
Some can't face reality past their undivided love and support for a company that wouldn't think twice about lying and covering up their wrongdoings in order to rip you off and not lose any money in replacing defective batteries.

I'm not joking and like most people, battery life between charges is critical. It would be nice if Apple were a bit more transparent about what they are doing. But most batteries don't reduce effectiveness to the point where Apple may reduce processor speed before 3 or so years.

A laptop I have for work is on its 2nd battery and needs a third. I'm barely able to get an hour and a half to two hours out of it. The battery indicator is faulty in that it says I'll have more time available then the system just craps out. Real bad for a meeting. I'd rather HP reduce the processor speeds and do other things to help get more time out of the battery. Instead, I manually reduce brightness to the lowest setting where I can still see what I'm typing.

Apple is doing the right thing. Any other manufacturer would just let the battery fail early and leave you hanging.
[doublepost=1512995980][/doublepost]
They Put out newer iOS updates and slow down the processor performance to a crawl to force customers to upgrade their phones more often.
Hope some investigation comes out cause they been doing it for years and not only on the iPhone 6 and 6S.

FALSE. They have NOT been slowing down older phones with updated iOS installs. It has been proven time and again. Here's a link to an article with data behind the numbers:

http://appleinsider.com/articles/17...lder-iphones-down-on-purpose-with-ios-updates
 
  • Like
Reactions: vddobrev
I'm not joking and like most people, battery life between charges is critical. It would be nice if Apple were a bit more transparent about what they are doing. But most batteries don't reduce effectiveness to the point where Apple may reduce processor speed before 3 or so years.

A laptop I have for work is on its 2nd battery and needs a third. I'm barely able to get an hour and a half to two hours out of it. The battery indicator is faulty in that it says I'll have more time available then the system just craps out. Real bad for a meeting. I'd rather HP reduce the processor speeds and do other things to help get more time out of the battery. Instead, I manually reduce brightness to the lowest setting where I can still see what I'm typing.

Apple is doing the right thing. Any other manufacturer would just let the battery fail early and leave you hanging.

You can’t be for real.

If they slow down the processor, they should let us know it’s time for a new battery.
My iPhone 6S has been slow for some time and according to Geekbench, it now has about the same performance as my iPhone 6. I bought the 6S for its faster processor.


Also, where did you get the 3 years figure. There are people on here with a 6month old iPhone 7 reporting big this problem.
The 6S is about 2 years on the market and the majority of people complaining own a 6S.

What are you even talking about???
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.