Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
I’m curious about the back door request itself… back door to exactly what? If Apple itself cannot see the content, don’t have the keys, basically it’s useless outside of the user’s physical device; what’s dangerous about it?

Sure, the UK would get their hands on a bunch of obfuscated encrypted bits… but then, does it mean that they can actually crack it now if they want it so badly?
They want Apple to build a key that will allow them to see the data.
 
I agree with your examples in one-to-one communication (even on forums where there's hardly any authority or individual power). What I meant, and what I consider dangerous, is the way leaders of countries can spread misleading and false hate and poison by words. Ultimate consequences are often reason for war.
This is very true, but again I feel it’s impossible to somehow regulate or make laws against. Well, it’s impossible to make laws against that aren’t biased because a human has to interpret what is considered hateful. Depending on who that human is is going to be determine the outcome. People sometimes feel words or beliefs they disagree with are hateful but ones they agree with are perfectly fine. It’s all about perspective. I can’t use real world examples obviously but for instance, I feel a lot of criticism of Macs is hateful. It’s just people that don’t like or are jealous of Apple products. Someone that prefers a different brand might think that’s just my opinion of those computers. Obviously, I’m really stretching here because yeah, this is what I have to work with but you get the point. Just because someone thinks speech is bad doesn’t make it bad and just because someone thinks speech is perfectly fine, doesn’t make it perfectly fine.

As to world leaders, it’s usually not them that are spreading the poison but Talking Heads that you are staring at for hours a day on a glass screen telling you what’s going on.
 
This is very true, but again I feel it’s impossible to somehow regulate or make laws against. Well, it’s impossible to make laws against that aren’t biased because a human has to interpret what is considered hateful. Depending on who that human is is going to be determine the outcome. People sometimes feel words or beliefs they disagree with are hateful but ones they agree with are perfectly fine. It’s all about perspective. I can’t use real world examples obviously but for instance, I feel a lot of criticism of Macs is hateful. It’s just people that don’t like or are jealous of Apple products. Someone that prefers a different brand might think that’s just my opinion of those computers. Obviously, I’m really stretching here because yeah, this is what I have to work with but you get the point. Just because someone thinks speech is bad doesn’t make it bad and just because someone thinks speech is perfectly fine, doesn’t make it perfectly fine.

As to world leaders, it’s usually not them that are spreading the poison but Talking Heads that you are staring at for hours a day on a glass screen telling you what’s going on.
That’s especially true when a world leader has these Talking Heads in his pocket or when such a leader is a Talking Head himself….no interpretation needed.
Talking Heads often get poisonous and wrong information from exactly that government. Again, not necessarily interpretation.
Leaders know very well how important media are. Sometimes too easy to be abused. It’s happening in more and more places. Indeed…sometimes you just don’t know and cannot know. Growing angry sentiments, easy/simple solutions to complicated problems, less outspoken dwindling opposition, firm and simple presentation of problems and especially solutions, fear, etc.all are signs of things going bad. And that’s exactly what can be seen more and more.
Have a good day.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: russell_314
That’s especially true when a world leader has these Talking Heads in his pocket or when such a leader is a Talking Head himself….no interpretation needed.
Talking Heads often get poisonous and wrong information from exactly that government. Again, not necessarily interpretation.
Leaders know very well how important media are. Sometimes too easy to be abused. It’s happening in more and more places. Indeed…sometimes you just don’t know and cannot know. Growing angry sentiments, easy/simple solutions to complicated problems, less outspoken dwindling opposition, firm and simple presentation of problems and especially solutions, fear, etc.all are signs of things going bad. And that’s exactly what can be seen more and more.
Have a good day.

Hey, keep us out of this nonsense...

1740381310122.png
 
I suspect we've not heard the last of this. So far, it's been on a slowish burn - sort of under the radar. The BBC is making it headline news and rightly so. A lot of people will be pi**ed off about this and it will come back to bite the government come voting time. And remember, the IPA law doesn't just affect Apple. This needs to be answered by Google and others too. When I say a lot of people, I mean everyone who has a smart-phone and who values their data security and privacy.

Actually it’s already disappeared as it’s been pushed off the headlines, unsurprisingly considering current times by other stories.

Also on my iPhone I have no warning to disable it just that it cannot be offered to new users.
 
IME: People on the right tend to be far more civil towards their political and social opponents than those from the left. It is those from the left that are more inclined to be venomously nasty.
I agree. The reason is that socialism is a cult, at least it behaves like a cult. Many of my friends are on the left and when I see their posts online I have to look at their name to see who has posted because they all say exactly the same things, and in exactly the same way and are convinced what they say is absolutely right and everyone else is absolutely wrong. I think those of us on the right have the ability to see shades of grey rather than the binary vision those on the left have.
 
I agree. The reason is that socialism is a cult, at least it behaves like a cult. Many of my friends are on the left and when I see their posts online I have to look at their name to see who has posted because they all say exactly the same things, and in exactly the same way and are convinced what they say is absolutely right and everyone else is absolutely wrong. I think those of us on the right have the ability to see shades of grey rather than the binary vision those on the left have.
Remarkable that I find it the other way around. Especially in recent years and months and noticeable now that right seems to have moved to extreme right.
 
  • Like
Reactions: mjcharlton71
American politics is so different than what we see in Europe. There really is no mainstream left in the US. I can really only speak from a UK perspective and I see the left as being very intolerant of anyone who doesn't share its views. I don't see that from the right. The left has socialism, the right has no similar cult, if I can call it that.
 
American politics is so different than what we see in Europe. There really is no mainstream left in the US. I can really only speak from a UK perspective and I see the left as being very intolerant of anyone who doesn't share its views. I don't see that from the right. The left has socialism, the right has no similar cult, if I can call it that.
Well in Europe I see Wilders, Weidel, Orban, Meloni, Marine Le Penn, Farage, etc. And they all agree and they don’t look very tolerant to anyone who doesn’t share their views.
Maybe an extreme right wing cult. Maybe call it fascism.
 
Well in Europe I see Wilders, Weidel, Orban, Meloni, Marine Le Penn, Farage, etc. And they all agree and they don’t look very tolerant to anyone who doesn’t share their views.
Maybe an extreme right wing cult. Maybe call it fascism.
Farage will always debate, the left simply de-platforms and tries to re-write history. The term 'far-right' has been coined by the media which has its own agenda. I have started calling those on the left the 'far-left'. I am actually a liberal and prepared to defend liberal values. Clearly you are far-left so I will say no more.
 
  • Like
Reactions: steve333
Farage will always debate, the left simply de-platforms and tries to re-write history. The term 'far-right' has been coined by the media which has its own agenda. I have started calling those on the left the 'far-left'. I am actually a liberal and prepared to defend liberal values. Clearly you are far-left so I will say no more.
That’s exactly what I mean…judging me as “clearly far-left” is the way the extreme right cult likes to discuss and scapegoating is their tried and tested recipe. Same with stating that media has its own agenda. Term 'far right' has been coined by media? What about the term 'far-left'? Do you also mean media like X, Truth Social, etc.?
Liberal values? You mean the values of the persons I mentioned in my earlier post? Not a strange question, as you don’t mention these in this post.

Indeed, saying no more is probably the best you can think of.
Wishing you a very good day.
 
Last edited:
I live in a liberal democracy where people are free to be who they are, where I am free to be openly gay and where students in school have more freedoms and rights than they have ever had. Then I see an alien culture which is unhappy with things as they are and tries to de-liberalise our society. I have seen this first hand in schools where LGBT support has been stopped or diluted because of pressure from parents who are part of this culture. Please don't assume those of us who are opposed to fundamentalist religions eroding our hard-won freedoms are somehow knuckle-heads. Liberal democracies are hard-won and need to be defended robustly. The vast majority of the world is not comprised of liberal democracies.
When populations move around, sometimes this causes changes in government. It’s important for people to be able to discuss these things openly without fear of their government imprisoning them. Unfortunately, some governments feel that any opposition should be crushed violently and while that is one way it’s not the best way if you’re living in a free country.

I feel like this whole topic has gone a little bit off of the original one where governments want the ability to monitor what you’re doing with the iCloud encryption but it’s all because of that. Government’s fear that if they can’t see what you’re doing then you might be doing something they don’t like.
 
I think we should move away from left/right discussions, and Farage, Yaxley-Lennon etc. This article is about the UK government demanding a backdoor in Apple's E2EE service. Let's talk about that.
Agree, but in these times those things interconnect pretty fast.
 
Actually it’s already disappeared as it’s been pushed off the headlines, unsurprisingly considering current times by other stories.

Also on my iPhone I have no warning to disable it just that it cannot be offered to new users.
Me too. I suspect we just wait for the follow up email or notice from Apple telling those of us who still have it enabled what to do next.
 
You might want to check exceptions and limitations to free speech from a legal perspective in the US. While you have the first amendment, there are exceptions to it that you should be aware of which were set by later legal cases. I would go research it carefully. It is actually on par with restrictions in the UK should you end up in court.

Worth noting as well that it depends of course on the quality of your legal defence. And even if you win, you might be bankrupt afterwards.
Well of course there are exceptions. Threats and libel typically get cited as the biggest ones. But there is no other country with true free speech as we know it here. That is to say we're the only country to have it enshrined at every level of government the way we do, which is why we developed such a reverence for that particular right.
 
You might want to check exceptions and limitations to free speech from a legal perspective in the US. ... It is actually on par with restrictions in the UK should you end up in court.
That's not even close to accurate.

E.g.: In the US truth is an absolute defense against accusations of defamation. Not so in the UK.

In the US you can be as racist, abusive, offensive, etc. as you wish to be, as long as you're not crossing any of the lines I noted in this post. Not so in the UK.

In the US you can call out public officials without fear of government persecution. Not so in the UK.

So, yeah: We do have limits on free speech, but they are limits I think just about anybody would find fair and reasonable.

Not so much in the UK.

Oh yeah: And our government hasn't told Apple they expect to be able to spy on its customers, world-wide, at will ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: clayj and steve333
That's not even close to accurate.

E.g.: In the US truth is an absolute defense against accusations of defamation. Not so in the UK.

In the US you can be as racist, abusive, offensive, etc. as you wish to be, as long as you're not crossing any of the lines I noted in this post. Not so in the UK.

In the US you can call out public officials without fear of government persecution. Not so in the UK.

So, yeah: We do have limits on free speech, but they are limits I think just about anybody would find fair and reasonable.

Not so much in the UK.

Oh yeah: And our government hasn't told Apple they expect to be able to spy on its customers, world-wide, at will ;)

Couple of corrections for you.

1. The limitations are approximately the same if you do some research. We just don’t have a constitution to define the default situation on which the limitations are built on. We do have a functional mostly apolitical legal system though unlike your good selves.

And let’s not forget the first amendment violation when they kick out AP because they said something hurty.

2. Check out the CLOUD Act (Trump signed in 2018) if you think you’re in a better state than us with RIPA.

As for calling out public officials in the US you might want to look at a reputable news source in the last few days and reevaluate that. Hint: private security is not a legal instrument but is used like one.

There isn’t a functioning government in the US at the moment to protect your speech.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.