Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.
Why OLED? The burn-in issue still exists especially if you use a monitor quite a lot and highest brightness. Even OLED based reference monitors are extremely rare and have limited uses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TVreporter
If I have to wait until 2027 to get a decent Apple external display I’m gonna lose my mind. Also, really? We’re talking about 2027 rumors now?
Seriously. The snails pace of product refreshes other than iPhone and iPad is agonizing at times. It ends up causing people to buy a 2 year old product or wait another year for a new product, affecting the perceived value. Apple doesn’t seem to care for that anyway, everything is at a premium no matter what.

Obviously I’m part of the problem because I am still eager to buy 😂. It just makes the decision so much more difficult when I don’t know when to expect a refresh of a monitor, desktop, laptop, etc. I ended up buying a cheap Dell while waiting for the M2 Air and when those dropped I was underwhelmed so continued to wait.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TVreporter
At this stage Apple just give me a 75 inch one of these with Apple TV built in and i will be happy.
 
Switched from a setup with three screens which already was quite high-end (LG Ultrafine 5k together with 2 x LG Ultrafine 4K) to a 42" LG C2 TV running at 4k 120Hz and I couldn't be happier even though it's not "retina" any more and there are inconveniences like some tinkering with DP adapters and the need to use a TV remote.

The image quality is just so incredibly great and having a single large surface in front of me that finally deserves to be called "Desktop" is just so amazing.

Cost me about 1000€, so chances I'll break the bank to get the Apple one are quite low, but I'll be happy to get HDMI 2.1 support next time I upgrade my MacBook.
 
Last edited:
It's not for consumer use, it's for "NORMAL consumer use." They can define Normal any way they want.

Actually no, they cannot since trying to stretch the definition too much would easily turn into deception, which tends to be an illegal business practice in most reasonable jurisdictions. Not to mention the damage to the confidence in the brand if too many reasonable coverage requests are denied.

It does make sense to set some reasonable limitations though: some example they specify as not covered for "abnormal" use is e.g. if the TV is set in a place with excessive temperature or humidity like in a sauna... I'd argue that if that's the case it's perfectly reasonable to deny warranty coverage.
 
OLED displays are great but prone to burn-in, which is especially an issue when used with desktop interfaces which tend to display static elements for extended time.

Hopefully Apple will have the issue sorted out, but it's a concern.

That's likely WHY Apple has been a slow adopter of OLED ... they are working on solving these kinds of issues before mass adoption.

But whatever happened to MicroLED? I thought it was superior to everything else? I firmly believed that Apple was aiming to bypass OLED in favour of MicroLED.
 
But whatever happened to MicroLED? I thought it was superior to everything else? I firmly believed that Apple was aiming to bypass OLED in favour of MicroLED.

There are some commercial products being announced, e.g. the ASUS ProArt Cinema PQ07 (135", 4K). Of course it's a very niche product.

I guess manufacturing is not there yet to produce MicroLED displays in more common consumer display sizes and high pixel densities at scale and it will likely require a few years for that to happen. Until then, MiniLED will be the to-go technology in usage scenarios where OLED is not well suited.
 
I'll be back when Apple releases 27" MicroLED Display with ProMotion, 700 nits standard brightness, and 2000 nits peak brightness :cool: in 2033
 
2027 makes this one of the biggest who cares speculative posts in a while. It's like being interested in Max coming out in 2029. It's not even worth the brain space much less these keystrokes, sorry about that.
 
That's likely WHY Apple has been a slow adopter of OLED ... they are working on solving these kinds of issues before mass adoption.

But whatever happened to MicroLED? I thought it was superior to everything else? I firmly believed that Apple was aiming to bypass OLED in favour of MicroLED.


We believe they have moved onto nano-led.
 
I must admit I'm concerned about OLED on my Mac where the screen is left on for 7-8 hours a day while working.

It's acceptable on my iPhone and Watch because I just don't interact with them that much or leave them idle on a static screen. That's not the case with my computers.

I recently purchased an OLED desktop monitor last year and after a full day of work, it brought up a warning dialogue box that it needed to perform some kind of pixel refreshing to maintain the display and stop burn-in. (Asus PG42UQ).

I don't expect Apple to bring up such dialogues, but I do expect the computer to dim when it thinks you're not looking at the screen anymore like with the iPhone and for me I don't think that's acceptable.

I would much prefer they continue with MiniLED-based FALD backlighting since there's no risk of burn-in. They just need to increase the zone count vastly from the current 2,500 zones with 10,000 LED's to maybe 10,000 zones with 40,000 LED's.

There are at least two OLED ( or OLED category ) technology that will hugely improve or even Eliminate this problem. ELQD or OLED NanoRod. Both *will* not be be fully mass market ready in 2027. But the usual Apple moves would be to switch to OLED for a few years before moving to these technology.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.