The common thread I've seen in the 9700x and 9600x reviews is that the performance gains are small compared to the cost, and they still lag behind comparable Intel parts in some tests. With that being said, we still haven't seen any 9900/9950/x3D parts (let alone reviews), so I think anyone claiming Zen 5 sucks based off one of two SKUs is disingenuous at best. Part of that difference is due to the Intel parts having more cores (even if half of them are e-cores), so those parts pull ahead in multithreaded tests. But in single core tests the AMD parts tend to pull ahead.
I would still rather roll the dice on a 7000 or 9000 series AMD build over anything from 13th or 14th gen Intel, especially since Intel has apparently known about issues with 13th gen since 2022 and 14th gen since last year and decided to remain silent about it until the issues became publicly known.