huh? Microsoft did this kind of thing for at least at decade before anyone did anything about it.
This is a very different situation, there was a point in the 1990s when it was literally almost impossible to buy a PC that wasn't running windows. Microsoft almost had a total monopoly over OEMs.
Apple doesn't hold a total monoply in anything.
The situation with Microsoft, was that. if an OEM decided they would offer more than just Windows as a preloaded OS, Microsoft would threaten to pull that OEM's windows license. And at that point in time, No windows on your machines = out of business. So they quite literally had control over the OEMS and hardware makers. It was pretty crazy ( I was a bit young at the time, but know plenty of people in the industry who remember that ) from what I've heard. Its why Microsoft got in trouble with the DOJ, they pretty much had a total monopoly, and as far as Desktop/Laptops OS's go, they still kinda do.
To also put it into perspective how huge Microsoft was back then, adjusted for inflation in todays dollars, I think they were worth over 800 billion dollars. Yeah. Big. Up until somewhat recently, almost any company that got into a tango with Microsoft on a competitive or legal front got anally pwnd.
Apple it a different Situation, they don't have a monopoly in any market. Not even close. If Apple goes to Best buy or Frys, or Wal Mart or whatever big boy retailer and says " you can only sell iPads and iPhones and no other phones or tablets " the retailers will walk away and not care.
Same thing with carriers, If Apple goes to verzion, or Sprint, or whoever and says " You can now only sell iPhones, or we won't sell anymore iphones to you " The carrier will walk away, because they'll be fine without the iPhone.
Very different .