I complained about the battery as well, but things like the Quest have similar batter life.2 hours of battery life with a battery pack. Only Apple can get away with this in 2023.
![]()
No it is not lol. If this was discriminatory pricing then people with Lactose intolerance would not be paying more at coffee shops for dairy alternatives.Bold move from Apple if that’s the case. That could quite easily be considered discriminatory pricing.
This is a developer tech demo. Obviously in the future the battery will be inside the device. If you are going to buy this one day one, you will be developing for this or have a lot of money to spend on tech betas.
Make no mistake this is the future of personal computing. In 10 years nobody will own an iPhone or a Mac with a screen.
Its not a 4k display.. its a display that feels like a 4k display. We do not know the exact resolution at this moment.Anyone else find it ironic that they advertise an iPad health feature which measures the device-to-eye distance, yet their groundbreaking new product has 4K displays an inch away from your eyeballs?![]()
Not very good if you want to use this thing on a flight, or want to walk around your house for a full work day as they showcased in the presentation. but I'm sure Apple will sell you additional batteries for $500 each probably lol.2 hours of battery life with a battery pack. Only Apple can get away with this in 2023.
![]()
Porn will be amazing on this thing!!!
It’s not slim at all IMO:I think this has amazing potential. Looking at the actual headset minus the fabric parts is pretty slim for a gen 1. Now without that fabric and even smaller lenses, you basically have glasses. I’ll bet we’re not too far from that and I think this will help us as consumers and Apple get there.
I love it but it's too expensive! Outrageous. $3,500 without tax is alot of money.
yeah right, they know thats what advances technology and creates clear winners... blu ray vs HD DVD etc... whoever porn selects to be it's host becomes the winner hahaWhat happens if Apple doesn't allow that? Finds a way to block it.
$3499 gets you the 720p version with mono sound and no batteries or power cord. If you want the 4K spacial audio model with batteries and power cable then pricing starts at $8999."The Vision Pro is priced starting at $3,499."
"Given the high price point, there appears to be a single model..."
Apple never uses "starting at" if there is no upgrade option unless, in this case, they are referring to the optical inserts for eyeglass-wearers (which are a separate purchase).
This also means that non-eyeglass wearers interested in saving up for this device may wish to increase their carrot intake immediately. Because if you buy these and then you find out later you need glasses, those Zeiss lenses will cost you even more.
Or stick to contact lenses or lasik."The Vision Pro is priced starting at $3,499."
"Given the high price point, there appears to be a single model..."
Apple never uses "starting at" if there is no upgrade option unless, in this case, they are referring to the optical inserts for eyeglass-wearers (which are a separate purchase).
This also means that non-eyeglass wearers interested in saving up for this device may wish to increase their carrot intake immediately. Because if you buy these and then you find out later you need glasses, those Zeiss lenses will cost you even more.
Said that to a friend as soon as that iDevice "eye distance" thing was announcedAnyone else find it ironic that they advertise an iPad health feature which measures the device-to-eye distance, yet their groundbreaking new product has 4K displays an inch away from your eyeballs?![]()
You'd be surprised how many people out there have a ton of disposable income to spend... and how many people are fools that will just swipe a credit card without thinking lol... This thing will sell really well regardless.. I am sure Apple didn't just throw a dart at a wall and pick a price... A lot of research and thought went in to this pricing.. This is probably their biggest product since the iphone, they are not going to risk it flopping.It's 2023, we're on the brink of a recession and Apple seems to think this is the right time to release a VR headset for $3.5k + TAX. Cook is smoking something...