Possibly, but I still think Apple's solution for the 27" iMac is "you can buy Mac Mini + Studio Display if you were a low end buyer, or Mac Studio + Studio Display if you were a high end buyer".
Me too...
...though I also think there will eventually be a resurrected iMac "bigger" branded PRO and priced 2X-3X higher than the traditional iMac 27"... more like the former iMac 27" PRO.
My best guess at why iMac 27" was discontinued is Apples expanding margin could not be realized on an entire Mac in a single package with a 5K 27" screen for "starting at..." $2K anymore. That margin problem- if the actual cause- can be fixed by waiting a while- relaunching one branded PRO, priced as PRO so that the full margin Apple desires can be realized by each sale.
Myself: after well over a decade of LOVING iMac "bigger" computers, I embraced separates with Mac Studio but
NOT an Apple-branded monitor (could not bring myself to pay the old whole iMac 27" price for the iMac 27" monitor alone). Instead, I went 5K2K ultra-wide and could never go back to 16:10 even if a new iMac "bigger" rolled out for "starting at... $999."
iMac is a great (relative) value on the way IN but a disaster at the end... when any one part and/or just software declared "vintage" makes the whole thing a "throw baby out with the bathwater" proposition. No more for me. But there seems to be enough interested that Apple should probably make them one and sell it to them. Will they pay 2X-3X the "starting at..." price? TBD. I do suspect a LOT of the longing for that resurrection is tied to the relative "bargain"
PRICE vs. the actual form factor itself. But we'll see... or we won't.