The company(s) that Apple was getting the leather from to make the products, I am sure they aren't going to close down. They will sell it to other companies and / or find other uses for it..
Nomad (the end..........)I've been using Apple Leather cases for my last two iPhones (7 plus and 11 pro), and I've been very happy with those, so when I ordered the 15 pro I naturally ordered the leather case "replacement", ie. the FineWoven case.
If it's as bad as the first impressions indicate I'm probably in the marked for another case pretty soon...
Anyone knows of any good Apple-like leather cases?![]()
I don't know...Nomad (the end..........)
Ok, well I consider that a good thing anyway. It makes beef cheaper for people to buy and eat. It’s different to, say, mink furs where the mink isn’t really used for anything else but fur.Some cows are produced solely for their leather. Also, the major part of leather being produced is used to subsidize meat production.
How can you believe something like this with how long they refused to put usb-c in their devices and forced people to buy bricks because they don't come in the fancy over constructed box that people usually toss. This is strictly about money but since marketing can't say that they use buzz words to make the consumer feel like they are doing something good while paying the same price for an inferior product.Another way to frame this is that missteps like this can and do happen when a company is sincerely committed to its environmental targets
Except in this case it’s pretty clear someone was intentionally scratching it with their finger.
The Verge’s review of this case is the top story on their website right now. But it’s got almost 300 comments so I guess mission accomplished for Nilay Patel. Anything to get traffic.
You're saying that like the cows would be killed only to be made into phone cases lol
How can you believe something like this with how long they refused to put usb-c in their devices and forced people to buy bricks because they don't come in the fancy over constructed box that people usually toss. This is strictly about money but since marketing can't say that they use buzz words to make the consumer feel like they are doing something good while paying the same price for an inferior product.
Nothing wrong with leather since it's durable and biodegradable. And at least until a few years back there was a glut of skins from beef production. That said, from an environmental standpoint it's not as simple as leather being a byproduct. Tanning alone can produce a greater amount of greenhouse gases than recycled synthetic materials and the process also results in large amounts of wastewater polluted by chemicals that affect water supplies and agriculture. Of course, if the replacement material is subpar in durability compared to leather it's going to have the opposite effect since that would create more waste in the long run.What’s wrong with leather anyway?! It’s a byproduct of the tonnes of beef we all eat. I’d rather leather continue to be made than it go to waste… we’re still eating beef and the cattle are dying in any case. Bring back leather!
You make good points, but every year apple delayed was another year thousands of (now pointless) lightning cables sold. A quick google search tells me apples makes 5 billion a year on lightning cables and mfi certificates.USB-C is terrible example.
The EU mandate on USB-C cables has nothing to do with the environment.
People already have BILLIONS of functioning lightning cables and accessories in use, so forcing them to change this isn't an environmental deed, but rather quite the opposite.
The fact Apple delayed this transition for so long gave consumers time to adjust their purchasing decisions to reflect to coming reality.
That's certainly how it has played in our household - we've only bought new lightning cables where we absolutely need to, but with USB-C cables you can buy a 2 or 3 pack because you know you'll need them in the future.
And criminals never ever ever use AirTags.I do not have a car, but if I had one, I would try to get rid of the logo. At least if it is one of those cars that other need for bragging.
I do not know what a GAP is, but if I buy sportswear, I try to get rid of the logos. Sadly Nike made their shows in a way that they might fall apart, if you just cut the logos off. So your best option is to go for shoes where the logo at least has the same colour as the shoes. I like my Nike shoes, but I do not want to be associated with that brand, as it is often worn by criminals.
You mean plasticStill don’t know why they didn’t use vegan leather rather than this crap
It seems more of a waste to not utilize murdered animals to their fullest. Isn’t fine woven just more plastic?
i completely debadged my car and the non removable stuff was blacked out .. if you get close enough you “might” be able to see the H logo but you definitely won’t know what model of H it is.What case do you have on your Car covering the logo?
It seems more of a waste to not utilize murdered animals to their fullest. Isn’t fine woven just more plastic?