Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

mbell1975

macrumors 6502a
Mar 17, 2012
737
0
http://www.phonearena.com/news/Goog...evices-by-Google-services-activations_id25221



Turns out a great metric to pull that data is from the Google Play market Or at that time the Android Market place. The Kindle Fire never had access to it so it was never counted by Google.

Sorry I was on my tablet at the time so posting a link was rather difficult. But it does go to show you that there are facts to back it up.

Wrong yet again. Read my last post with proof from analysts Google includes both the Fire and the Nook in "Android" tablet sales Also, Amazon USED to block access to the market but began allowing access to the market back in Dec.
 

ChazUK

macrumors 603
Feb 3, 2008
5,393
25
Essex (UK)
Wrong yet again. Read my last post with proof from analysts Google includes both the Fire and the Nook in "Android" tablet sales Also, Amazon USED to block access to the market but began allowing access to the market back in Dec.

Amazon used to convert Android Market links into Kindle Appstore links from the browser but no longer do so after criticism.

Because the Android Market is not installed on the Fire, all that opens now is the web based Android Market from which you can't download anything because the Fire lacks the necessary Google applications to utilise Android Market so no, Amazon haven't began allowing access to Android Market.

You seem to know little of how closed the Kindle Fire is.

BTW, Strategy Analytics numbers are NOT from Google. SA are an independent Analytics company.

http://www.strategyanalytics.com/
 

Rodimus Prime

macrumors G4
Oct 9, 2006
10,136
4
Wrong yet again. Read my last post with proof from analysts Google includes both the Fire and the Nook in "Android" tablet sales Also, Amazon USED to block access to the market but began allowing access to the market back in Dec.


Minus the fact that you failed to read. I said Google which proves your first thing wrong saying Google counts them. Your links do nothing to address that.

You mbell have been moving the goal post and have been mostly spreading FUD and being caught at it.
 

mbell1975

macrumors 6502a
Mar 17, 2012
737
0
Amazon used to convert Android Market links into Kindle Appstore links from the browser but no longer do so after criticism.

Because the Android Market is not installed on the Fire, all that opens now is the web based Android Market from which you can't download anything because the Fire lacks the necessary Google applications to utilise Android Market so no, Amazon haven't began allowing access to Android Market.

You seem to know little of how closed the Kindle Fire is.

BTW, Strategy Analytics numbers are NOT from Google. SA are an independent Analytics company.

http://www.strategyanalytics.com/


So why do analysts and writers everywhere include kindle fire and nook sales with Android tablets? They are all wrong and a few guys on this forum are right? :rolleyes:
 

matttye

macrumors 601
Mar 25, 2009
4,957
32
Lincoln, England
Everyone should know by now what iOS is all about. So buying a product and then complaining about your perceived limitations of that device is silly. Thats like me buying an HDTV and then pissing and moaning in every forum thread that it doesn't do 3D. Why would you own a product you didn't like? Sell it. Crying about it in here isn't going to make Apple start adapting to what you want.

Not everybody visits tech sites and reads up on various devices before making a purchase.

I bought the original iPhone because of its' brilliant marketing campaign and the fact that I'd never seen anything like it before. Did I expect it not to be able to send a text message to multiple people or forward a text message? No. Some things can only be learned by the experience of actually using a device. You can't research every feature otherwise you'd never buy anything!
 

ChazUK

macrumors 603
Feb 3, 2008
5,393
25
Essex (UK)
So why do analysts and writers everywhere include kindle fire and nook sales with Android tablets? They are all wrong and a few guys on this forum are right? :rolleyes:

Lets follow the flow of conversation shall we?


Clearly you do not understand Android. Android is open source. Google can not stop companies from using Android. What Google can is not give the devices its apps which are licensed. For example the kindle fire runs on Android but Google does not count them for android activation.

In this post Rodimus is directly referencing Google's activation numbers. You followed with:


Sure as hell they do. Why do you think Android has cut into the iPads huge marketshare lead? Its certainly not from Tab and Xoom sales LMAO
By this context, the "they" you are referencing is Google.

Rodimus responds:
See that is where you just are making stuff up.

Google has stated that when they release those figures and count they only count ones that active to Google services threw Google Apps. Guess what since the Kindle does not use those it does not get count. End of story. But you can keep living in your fantasy world of lies and myths.

You fired back with:


Again, you are incorrect. Look up just about ANY article that talks about this subject and you will see that the Kindle Fire's sales are most definitely included in Android tablet sales.

<snip>

Strategy Analytics......
Referencing an independent companies analytics on the tablet market who's numbers are not affiliated with Google.

I'm not sure how good your English is or if you have any difficulties following a conversation so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt but Rodimus was always referencing Google's activation figures, not those of independent analytics companies.

The moment Google starts blowing their own trumpet over Kindle Fire market penetration I'd be beside you in crying "BS" but as it stands Google have only ever included devices that meet Google's compatibility requirements for Market access.
 

BiggAW

macrumors 68030
Jun 19, 2010
2,563
176
Connecticut
Because the Android Market is not installed on the Fire, all that opens now is the web based Android Market from which you can't download anything because the Fire lacks the necessary Google applications to utilise Android Market so no, Amazon haven't began allowing access to Android Market.

You seem to know little of how closed the Kindle Fire is.

You just need to learn how to root thing thing. Market works fine on mine, just some apps won't load because of no camera/GPS/cell.
 

mbell1975

macrumors 6502a
Mar 17, 2012
737
0
mabell, what were your biggest adjustments going from android to iphone?

Having owned all 3 iPads, I knew what to expect with iOS so it wasn't a big change really. To be honest, I wish the screen were a bit bigger, adding a custom ringtone was easier and I could swap in a new keyboard and dialer but I can live with it. I will gladly exchange these things for an OS that is far more stable, apps that actually work right, an OS I don't have to baby and make sure I close out of an app that will drain my battery, a phone that doesn't force close and crash and a phone where I know I will get the new OS update the very day its released. I won't have to sit around for 6 months wondering if my phone will ever get it or if I have to buy a new phone at retail price just to get the new OS. Done with that BS and loving the iPhone :)
 

ChazUK

macrumors 603
Feb 3, 2008
5,393
25
Essex (UK)
You just need to learn how to root thing thing. Market works fine on mine, just some apps won't load because of no camera/GPS/cell.

It's great that these devices can be modified to install Android Market on non-complaint hardware (I did exactly that on my old Archos 5 Internet Tablet when I had it - man I love to tinker with things! :)) but I doubt the ability to do so would have significant impact on Google's android activation figures.

If every Kindle fire was sold with Market access from the start, things may be different but as Amazon seem to be having vastly more success with app sales compared to the Play Market, I doubt that it is a huge thing for every Fire owner out there.
 

BiggAW

macrumors 68030
Jun 19, 2010
2,563
176
Connecticut
It's great that these devices can be modified to install Android Market on non-complaint hardware (I did exactly that on my old Archos 5 Internet Tablet when I had it - man I love to tinker with things! :)) but I doubt the ability to do so would have significant impact on Google's android activation figures.

If every Kindle fire was sold with Market access from the start, things may be different but as Amazon seem to be having vastly more success with app sales compared to the Play Market, I doubt that it is a huge thing for every Fire owner out there.

Somehow, the Amazon market sells more than the Google Market. Probably partly due to the Kindle Fire. Yes, it's fracturing the market to the extreme, but at the same time, that's the flexibility allowed by Android. That device might not exist at that price point if it weren't for Android allowing manufacturers to do whatever they want with it.
 

batting1000

macrumors 604
Sep 4, 2011
7,464
1,874
Florida
That's the problem. They both slow things down. And sometimes, refuse to update at all. AT&T and Samsuck won't update the SGS to ICS because "it doesn't have enough memory". Yeah, when they add all the bloat. They are pretty much lying, as XDA has several ICS ROMs running on that phone. And that gets me to another problem. In order to have a decent ROM, you have to figure out how to install a 3rd party one from XDA, wipe the device, and then re-install all your software every time a new ROM comes out. ARGH. And they all customize slightly differently.

Yes, the GE devices are immune from that problem, but very few have them. Verizon is even hanging up the updates on the CDMA Gnexs.

Well the Galaxy S 1 is getting a "value pack update, at least. Most XDA devs take stuff out of the ROMs to make it run better and faster so in a sense, Samsung may be telling the truth. The only reason, in my eyes, that you'd want to root is to run a newer OS version before it comes out or if you want system level tweaks. Otherwise, all the customization you need is available without root. When you root, you should realize that you'll have to set everything up again, etc. Most people root because A) they don't know how or what it is or B) because the OS they have already runs fine for what they need and they have no need to root.
 

Vegastouch

macrumors 603
Jul 12, 2008
6,185
992
Las Vegas, NV
Well the Galaxy S 1 is getting a "value pack update, at least. Most XDA devs take stuff out of the ROMs to make it run better and faster so in a sense, Samsung may be telling the truth. The only reason, in my eyes, that you'd want to root is to run a newer OS version before it comes out or if you want system level tweaks. Otherwise, all the customization you need is available without root. When you root, you should realize that you'll have to set everything up again, etc. Most people root because A) they don't know how or what it is or B) because the OS they have already runs fine for what they need and they have no need to root.

Um, no...you dont need to set up anything when you root. Not sure what you even mean there. You can root your phone and it doesnt change anything. It just gives the user permission to access their own files. It is just like SSH on the iPhone only you dont need to log in on your PC to do it.

There are many reasons to root. One being you can delete all the bloatware the carrier puts on it. There are some apps that require root ...like Adfree that takes off all the ads on Apps that run them ...like free Apps have some ads.
Yes you can run different ROM's but you can also install different modems that work better in your area to make your battery better. If you root your phone and just put on some Apps that require root and dont change the OS...the if you unroot, there is nothing to set up again.
 

batting1000

macrumors 604
Sep 4, 2011
7,464
1,874
Florida
Um, no...you dont need to set up anything when you root. Not sure what you even mean there. You can root your phone and it doesnt change anything. It just gives the user permission to access their own files. It is just like SSH on the iPhone only you dont need to log in on your PC to do it.

There are many reasons to root. One being you can delete all the bloatware the carrier puts on it. There are some apps that require root ...like Adfree that takes off all the ads on Apps that run them ...like free Apps have some ads.
Yes you can run different ROM's but you can also install different modems that work better in your area to make your battery better. If you root your phone and just put on some Apps that require root and dont change the OS...the if you unroot, there is nothing to set up again.

I know that, I meant when you gotta set up ROMs when you download them and wipe data and all that stuff.
 

Invincibilizer

macrumors 6502a
Aug 18, 2011
769
2
Having owned all 3 iPads, I knew what to expect with iOS so it wasn't a big change really. To be honest, I wish the screen were a bit bigger, adding a custom ringtone was easier and I could swap in a new keyboard and dialer but I can live with it. I will gladly exchange these things for an OS that is far more stable, apps that actually work right, an OS I don't have to baby and make sure I close out of an app that will drain my battery, a phone that doesn't force close and crash and a phone where I know I will get the new OS update the very day its released. I won't have to sit around for 6 months wondering if my phone will ever get it or if I have to buy a new phone at retail price just to get the new OS. Done with that BS and loving the iPhone :)

Updates are too overrated. The new functions are so small and exclusive , it won't even affect you most of the time.

I used to be on 4.3.5 upgraded to 5.0 for tethered jailbreak, no reason to have a tethered jailbreak on iOS 4.

I would be on 5.0 right now but an untethered jailbreak came out for 5.0.1 so i upgraded to that just to jailbreak.

5.1 adds japanese, doesn't affect me, still on 5.0.1 because added functions are pointless and I'm preserving jailbreak.

If I had no interest in jailbreaking, I would still be on 4.3.5..and I know many people who are on 4.2.1 or 4.3.3. Incremental updates by Apple barely affect anyone, People upgrade for the heck of it. Sometimes its even bad, 5.0.1 claimed to fix battery issue in 5.0, it didn't. 5.1 claimed to fix battery issue on 5.0.1, no thanks I'm not going to risk my jailbreak for a possible battery fix.
Plus if iOS6 remains the same, I would most likely stay at 5.0.1 for who knows how long.....
 

mbell1975

macrumors 6502a
Mar 17, 2012
737
0
Updates are too overrated. The new functions are so small and exclusive , it won't even affect you most of the time.

I used to be on 4.3.5 upgraded to 5.0 for tethered jailbreak, no reason to have a tethered jailbreak on iOS 4.

I would be on 5.0 right now but an untethered jailbreak came out for 5.0.1 so i upgraded to that just to jailbreak.

5.1 adds japanese, doesn't affect me, still on 5.0.1 because added functions are pointless and I'm preserving jailbreak.

If I had no interest in jailbreaking, I would still be on 4.3.5..and I know many people who are on 4.2.1 or 4.3.3. Incremental updates by Apple barely affect anyone, People upgrade for the heck of it. Sometimes its even bad, 5.0.1 claimed to fix battery issue in 5.0, it didn't. 5.1 claimed to fix battery issue on 5.0.1, no thanks I'm not going to risk my jailbreak for a possible battery fix.
Plus if iOS6 remains the same, I would most likely stay at 5.0.1 for who knows how long.....

The point is, you CAN update to the newest OS from day one, anytime you want without a jailbreak. You dint get that choice with Android. Unless you have a GSM Nexus phone, you are waiting 6 months and hoping your phone is even on the update list. It's a joke.
 

BiggAW

macrumors 68030
Jun 19, 2010
2,563
176
Connecticut
Well the Galaxy S 1 is getting a "value pack update, at least. Most XDA devs take stuff out of the ROMs to make it run better and faster so in a sense, Samsung may be telling the truth. The only reason, in my eyes, that you'd want to root is to run a newer OS version before it comes out or if you want system level tweaks. Otherwise, all the customization you need is available without root. When you root, you should realize that you'll have to set everything up again, etc. Most people root because A) they don't know how or what it is or B) because the OS they have already runs fine for what they need and they have no need to root.

They are lying. AOSP ICS runs fine on the Nexus S, which is a Galaxy S1 device. The reason it won't run on the Captivate is because TW is so bloated, it bloats it past the limit. AOSP ICS runs fine, there are at least two ROMs out there that prove it. Of course, the argument is that the Captivate is a phone for hackers, so it doesn't matter anyways.

Rooting gets you a lot of access. Not only can you do a third-party ROM that works so much better, but you can use features like mobile hotspot, which is normally locked out by the carrier.
 

0m3ga

macrumors 6502
Mar 1, 2012
491
0
The point is, you CAN update to the newest OS from day one, anytime you want without a jailbreak. You dint get that choice with Android. Unless you have a GSM Nexus phone, you are waiting 6 months and hoping your phone is even on the update list. It's a joke.

True, but millions of people that jailbreak can't update on day one without loosing their jb. They are in the same shoes of many Android users. Waiting months before they can upgrade. Hell, some people are still on 4.3+ because they don't want to risk losing what they have.

However, here is a more valid point. I can do nearly everything on my stock Android phone that takes a jailbreak to do on my iphone4. The stock Android OS gives me what Apple's stock OS can't. Doesn't matter if I can get an update or several updates from Apple. It is still lacking. I'm not hating here, I still love the OS and Apple and still have all my Apple products. I just like to use every OS out there and can compare and contrast with a level head.
 

BiggAW

macrumors 68030
Jun 19, 2010
2,563
176
Connecticut
True, but millions of people that jailbreak can't update on day one without loosing their jb. They are in the same shoes of many Android users. Waiting months before they can upgrade. Hell, some people are still on 4.3+ because they don't want to risk losing what they have.

However, here is a more valid point. I can do nearly everything on my stock Android phone that takes a jailbreak to do on my iphone4. The stock Android OS gives me what Apple's stock OS can't. Doesn't matter if I can get an update or several updates from Apple. It is still lacking. I'm not hating here, I still love the OS and Apple and still have all my Apple products. I just like to use every OS out there and can compare and contrast with a level head.

Ok, you wait a month or two, not 6.
 

JMG

macrumors 6502a
May 4, 2006
554
2
Had 2 androids. Started out liking them, went back to iphone each time. Jailbreak or not, the experience is better on the iphone. The primary word I would use to describe both my android experiences were "inconsistent".
 
Last edited:

batting1000

macrumors 604
Sep 4, 2011
7,464
1,874
Florida
Have you been paying attention to how long jailbreaks have taken to launch recently? :confused:

This ^^

----------

They are lying. AOSP ICS runs fine on the Nexus S, which is a Galaxy S1 device. The reason it won't run on the Captivate is because TW is so bloated, it bloats it past the limit. AOSP ICS runs fine, there are at least two ROMs out there that prove it. Of course, the argument is that the Captivate is a phone for hackers, so it doesn't matter anyways.

Rooting gets you a lot of access. Not only can you do a third-party ROM that works so much better, but you can use features like mobile hotspot, which is normally locked out by the carrier.

Never said the Nexus S couldn't run ICS...it is running it right now, actually.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.