That's all true, but a 16 core 3.2 (with 4.4 turbo) is a pretty decent upgrade from the 8 core, especially if using software that can do something useful with more than one core. That's a $3200 jump where I live, but give it a few years and it won't be so bad.
Just because the AMD chips are fast doesn't make the new Mac Pro slow: and as far as I've seen it's pretty fast, silent and doesn't ever run into thermal issues. Same goes for the PCIe standard, it's hardly holding it back. I'm sure there will be an update in a few years that has a newer PCIe standard — it's hardly going to make todays machines defunct though.
"It won't be."
And "2009 - 2017 didn't see a lot of progress in computing technology"
Hmm, I just looked up the specs on the 2009 model Mac pro. Topped out at 8 core 2.93GHZ (2 x 4), 8MB cache per processor, max (at launch) 32GB 1066 MHz DDR3 ram (which would have been very expensive. It came standard with 6GB), ATI Radeon HD 4870 with 512 MB of GDDR5 (4 x if you wanted: no PCIe slots left after that I would think). All mechanical spinner drives, Firewire 800, USB 2, SATA II. SSDs were just emerging as an option and that was only on SATA: you could spend a fortune and get a Mac RAID card and set up a RAID that wouldn't even get SATA SSD speeds. By comparison to todays model it all looks pretty pathetic but with upgrades over the years these machines are still rocking and definitely have proved to be 10 year machines. I'd still be using one if the logic board hadn't died, and if I had the time I could have easily replaced the logic board.
I don't think your logic that there wasn't much progress holds up: maybe in raw processor speed or nm, but everything else changed a lot. As more and more developers optimise their apps for multi core and GPU it only gets better for us. While we are waiting around for PCIe 5.0 to supercede our new computers why not just hold out for 6.0